On 05.04.2012 01:36, Tony wrote:
Hi,
I recently had similar problems and logged a case with TAC. After
discussing/arguing with them for quite some time (2 cases over a period of 4-5
months) they were finally able to reproduce my issue and the net result was:
Filed a bug
: CSCtj63596
the fix
Hi Experts,
Does anyone know if its possible to disable pvst simulation function in
7600 series?
Thanks in advance
TAYFUN SARI
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hello Waris -
Thank you for the insight. I am curious about how much latency there is
when applied as a 10G-only device (e.g. a L3 border device linking a 10G
LAN to a 10G WAN ring, thus all traffic on the same ASIC) vs the normal
intended flow (1G aggregation). I just don't have the time to
Jarrod Raines wrote:
what's the source IP of the device sending the join? maybe an RPF issue?
The address of its LAN interface. Nothing special about it.
--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Colleagues,
I wonder what this may mean:
garage2#verify flash:c1841-advipservicesk9-mz.124-25f.bin
Verifying file integrity of flash:c1841-advipservicesk9-mz.124-25f.bin
Embedded hash not found in file
flash:c1841-advipservicesk9-mz.124-25f.bin.
garage2#
The image is evidently not corrupt
Colleagues,
As soon as I configure IPSec between 2 routers, PXE booting via those
routers no longer works. NIC bootroms obtain an IP address but cannot
fetch the bootfile via TFTP.
A tcpdump on the TFTP server shows a successful TFTP option
negotiation, but when it starts sending big data
I don't know about this specifically, but if it's true I know I had to manually
tune the buffers on some 3560's just to make them bearable. I'm in the process
of migrating away from them onto a 6500 with WS-X6748-GE-TX's instead. For what
it's worth, this was how I tuned the 3560's to
Scenario, Cisco 6921 IP phone connected to Cat4500 with IOS
12.2(54)SG1 Port has CDP, dot1x, QoS trust enabled etc.
When I ping from another subnet I get about 50% packetloss with no
obvious pattern. Phone drops registration to the callmanger, releases
IP and restarts, and cycles through it over
You can't do SVI based EoMPLS with plain'ol LAN cards facing the core. You
need a WAN card, like an ES, SIP, etc.
On 2012-04-05, at 4:06 PM, Chris Lane wrote:
All
I have 2 7600s directly connected ~ interfaces are Layer3 (IP) ospf/bgp
protocols running acroos
Loopbacks configured,
All
I have 2 7600s directly connected ~ interfaces are Layer3 (IP) ospf/bgp
protocols running acroos
Loopbacks configured,
version: s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH7.bin
here is where i am messing up.
i created a vlan x
put my cross connects in here.
but the VC is down..
my ldp
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 04:06:57PM -0400, Chris Lane wrote:
i created a vlan x
put my cross connects in here.
This is not supported by normal LAN hardware. If you want that, you need
to buy ES/ES+ cards.
interface Vlan3000
no ip address
xconnect x.x.x.x 3000 encapsulation mpls
Hey Skeeve,
Re config size, have you thought about using service compress-config?
This might help to reduce the config size by about 25-30%, which may
or may not be enough, or may not be enough for long enough.
Just a quick dir I did before adding command:
Router#dir nvram:
Directory of
Hi,
is anyone using the cbQosClassMapStats table from
CISCO-CLASS-BASED-QOS-MIB to get graphs for QoS service policies?
I have two pairs of 6500-class systems that have almost the exact same
configuration (minor differences in firmware versions and IP addresses).
These pairs are
Sup720-3BXL
Hi Victor,
I think it means exactly what it says it means. There is no embedded hash
included in the image file, so it can't compare it to that. I've seen this
before, but generally in older images I've been using, probably before some
point when Cisco decided to include the hash in the image
I ran into the same thing a few weeks back with the same hardware, same
version, different feature-set - 1841, 12.4(25f), IP Base. I figured it was
corrupt as well. Verified file size, MD5, etc. All checked out except the
embedded hash. Reloaded the box and all is well.
I, too, wonder why
On 2012-04-05 23:27, Brault, Ryan wrote:
I ran into the same thing a few weeks back with the same hardware,
same version, different feature-set - 1841, 12.4(25f), IP Base.
I figured it was corrupt as well. Verified file size, MD5, etc.
All checked out except the embedded hash. Reloaded the
Boot buffersize change size of nvram simulate file, there no nvram all files
stored on flash.
On 06.04.2012, at 0:43, Tom Storey t...@snnap.net wrote:
Hey Skeeve,
Re config size, have you thought about using service compress-config?
This might help to reduce the config size by about
Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su writes:
I feel that the issue may be in IP fragmentation of some sort which the
dumb PXE TCP/IP stack cannot handle, but a google search did not help.
At least neither an Intel NIC, nor a Realtek NIC nor a GPXE emulation
work.
I'm pretty sure you're on the
Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
I feel that the issue may be in IP fragmentation of some sort which the
dumb PXE TCP/IP stack cannot handle, but a google search did not help.
At least neither an Intel NIC, nor a Realtek NIC nor a GPXE emulation
work.
I'm pretty sure you're on the right
--- On Thu, 4/5/12, Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote:
From: Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPSEC + TFTP don't work
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Thursday, April 5, 2012, 7:45 PM
Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
I feel that the issue may be in IP
Randy wrote:
Try setting the MTU on the ethernet on the TFTP server to 1400 or so
rather than 1500. That oughta fix the problem, assuming that the tftp
server software is sanely written. If it were TCP (tftpboot is of
course udp) that would DTRT.
Actually I have tried
21 matches
Mail list logo