Re: [c-nsp] snmp counters wrong for SVI with multicast

2012-04-05 Thread Artyom Viklenko
On 05.04.2012 01:36, Tony wrote: Hi, I recently had similar problems and logged a case with TAC. After discussing/arguing with them for quite some time (2 cases over a period of 4-5 months) they were finally able to reproduce my issue and the net result was: Filed a bug : CSCtj63596 the fix

[c-nsp] Disabling 7600 pvst simulation feature

2012-04-05 Thread Tayfun Sarı
Hi Experts, Does anyone know if its possible to disable pvst simulation function in 7600 series? Thanks in advance TAYFUN SARI ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X architecture

2012-04-05 Thread Jeff Bacon
Hello Waris - Thank you for the insight. I am curious about how much latency there is when applied as a 10G-only device (e.g. a L3 border device linking a 10G LAN to a 10G WAN ring, thus all traffic on the same ASIC) vs the normal intended flow (1G aggregation). I just don't have the time to

Re: [c-nsp] router does not see IGMP joins

2012-04-05 Thread Victor Sudakov
Jarrod Raines wrote: what's the source IP of the device sending the join?  maybe an RPF issue? The address of its LAN interface. Nothing special about it. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru ___ cisco-nsp mailing

[c-nsp] Embedded hash not found

2012-04-05 Thread Victor Sudakov
Colleagues, I wonder what this may mean: garage2#verify flash:c1841-advipservicesk9-mz.124-25f.bin Verifying file integrity of flash:c1841-advipservicesk9-mz.124-25f.bin Embedded hash not found in file flash:c1841-advipservicesk9-mz.124-25f.bin. garage2# The image is evidently not corrupt

[c-nsp] IPSEC + TFTP don't work

2012-04-05 Thread Victor Sudakov
Colleagues, As soon as I configure IPSec between 2 routers, PXE booting via those routers no longer works. NIC bootroms obtain an IP address but cannot fetch the bootfile via TFTP. A tcpdump on the TFTP server shows a successful TFTP option negotiation, but when it starts sending big data

Re: [c-nsp] 2960s output drops

2012-04-05 Thread Vinny_Abello
I don't know about this specifically, but if it's true I know I had to manually tune the buffers on some 3560's just to make them bearable. I'm in the process of migrating away from them onto a 6500 with WS-X6748-GE-TX's instead. For what it's worth, this was how I tuned the 3560's to

[c-nsp] 50% intermittent packet loss on Cisco IP Phone connected to Cat4500

2012-04-05 Thread Roger Wiklund
Scenario, Cisco 6921 IP phone connected to Cat4500 with IOS 12.2(54)SG1 Port has CDP, dot1x, QoS trust enabled etc. When I ping from another subnet I get about 50% packetloss with no obvious pattern. Phone drops registration to the callmanger, releases IP and restarts, and cycles through it over

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 AtoM mpls issue

2012-04-05 Thread Jason Lixfeld
You can't do SVI based EoMPLS with plain'ol LAN cards facing the core. You need a WAN card, like an ES, SIP, etc. On 2012-04-05, at 4:06 PM, Chris Lane wrote: All I have 2 7600s directly connected ~ interfaces are Layer3 (IP) ospf/bgp protocols running acroos Loopbacks configured,

[c-nsp] 7600 AtoM mpls issue

2012-04-05 Thread Chris Lane
All I have 2 7600s directly connected ~ interfaces are Layer3 (IP) ospf/bgp protocols running acroos Loopbacks configured, version: s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXH7.bin here is where i am messing up. i created a vlan x put my cross connects in here. but the VC is down.. my ldp

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 AtoM mpls issue

2012-04-05 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 04:06:57PM -0400, Chris Lane wrote: i created a vlan x put my cross connects in here. This is not supported by normal LAN hardware. If you want that, you need to buy ES/ES+ cards. interface Vlan3000 no ip address xconnect x.x.x.x 3000 encapsulation mpls

Re: [c-nsp] Which switch can do what we need?

2012-04-05 Thread Tom Storey
Hey Skeeve, Re config size, have you thought about using service compress-config? This might help to reduce the config size by about 25-30%, which may or may not be enough, or may not be enough for long enough. Just a quick dir I did before adding command: Router#dir nvram: Directory of

[c-nsp] 6500 12.2(33)SXI5+ - cbQosClassMapStats missing entries?

2012-04-05 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, is anyone using the cbQosClassMapStats table from CISCO-CLASS-BASED-QOS-MIB to get graphs for QoS service policies? I have two pairs of 6500-class systems that have almost the exact same configuration (minor differences in firmware versions and IP addresses). These pairs are Sup720-3BXL

Re: [c-nsp] Embedded hash not found

2012-04-05 Thread Tony
Hi Victor, I think it means exactly what it says it means. There is no embedded hash included in the image file, so it can't compare it to that. I've seen this before, but generally in older images I've been using, probably before some point when Cisco decided to include the hash in the image

Re: [c-nsp] Embedded hash not found

2012-04-05 Thread Brault, Ryan
I ran into the same thing a few weeks back with the same hardware, same version, different feature-set - 1841, 12.4(25f), IP Base. I figured it was corrupt as well. Verified file size, MD5, etc. All checked out except the embedded hash. Reloaded the box and all is well. I, too, wonder why

Re: [c-nsp] Embedded hash not found

2012-04-05 Thread Łukasz Bromirski
On 2012-04-05 23:27, Brault, Ryan wrote: I ran into the same thing a few weeks back with the same hardware, same version, different feature-set - 1841, 12.4(25f), IP Base. I figured it was corrupt as well. Verified file size, MD5, etc. All checked out except the embedded hash. Reloaded the

Re: [c-nsp] Which switch can do what we need?

2012-04-05 Thread Nikolay Shopik
Boot buffersize change size of nvram simulate file, there no nvram all files stored on flash. On 06.04.2012, at 0:43, Tom Storey t...@snnap.net wrote: Hey Skeeve, Re config size, have you thought about using service compress-config? This might help to reduce the config size by about

Re: [c-nsp] IPSEC + TFTP don't work

2012-04-05 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su writes: I feel that the issue may be in IP fragmentation of some sort which the dumb PXE TCP/IP stack cannot handle, but a google search did not help. At least neither an Intel NIC, nor a Realtek NIC nor a GPXE emulation work. I'm pretty sure you're on the

Re: [c-nsp] IPSEC + TFTP don't work

2012-04-05 Thread Victor Sudakov
Robert E. Seastrom wrote: I feel that the issue may be in IP fragmentation of some sort which the dumb PXE TCP/IP stack cannot handle, but a google search did not help. At least neither an Intel NIC, nor a Realtek NIC nor a GPXE emulation work. I'm pretty sure you're on the right

Re: [c-nsp] IPSEC + TFTP don't work

2012-04-05 Thread Randy
--- On Thu, 4/5/12, Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote: From: Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPSEC + TFTP don't work To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Thursday, April 5, 2012, 7:45 PM Robert E. Seastrom wrote: I feel that the issue may be in IP

Re: [c-nsp] IPSEC + TFTP don't work

2012-04-05 Thread Victor Sudakov
Randy wrote: Try setting the MTU on the ethernet on the TFTP server to 1400 or so rather than 1500.  That oughta fix the problem, assuming that the tftp server software is sanely written.  If it were TCP (tftpboot is of course udp) that would DTRT. Actually I have tried