Hi,
after discussing in private e-mail, the issue could be solved:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:52:59AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
crypto isakmp client configuration group InternClient200910
key snip
dns 10.1.2.11 10.1.2.45
domain internal.example
pool ippool
acl DefaultrouteTunnel
The
Hi Rens,
It depends of course largely on the transmission speed you need, but most cisco
device up from say an 1841 for low speed links will do quite well. The only
thing you should keep in mind that the majority of the TCP enhancers cannot
optimize encrypted traffic very efficiently, so you
Never played with it (and it may be a dead-end feature), but 12.3T got some
acceleration functionality with RBSCP tunnels along with the VSAT HWICs. Wrap
this in IPSec and you should have a single-device footprint for each remote
site. (You then also have a readonable place to do ECMP rather
Hi Guys,
ASR1006 dual RP/Dual ESP - Followed this guide:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr1000/configuration/guide/chassis/issu.html
(Using ISSU to Perform a Consolidated Package Upgrade in a Dual Route
Processor Configuration)
Current XE version:
Call TAC
Andrew Jones
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of CiscoNSP_list
CiscoNSP_list
Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2012 1:39 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] ASR1006 ISSU upgrade fail
Hi Guys,
issu from 2.x train to 3.x train is unsupported. this is outlined in
issu notes for asr1k platform.
google 'asr1k issu compatibility tables' for info.
regards,
q.
-= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =-
On May 2, 2012, at 20:42, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list
issu from 2.x train to 3.x train is unsupported. this is outlined in
issu notes for asr1k platform.
google 'asr1k issu compatibility tables' for info.
Thanks - So I would need to copy the new IOS to both bootflash, and follow this
guide:
