[c-nsp] Port Errors

Hi All, I have a module (16 SFM-capable 16 port 10/100/1000mb RJ45) in a 6500 chasis running IOS Version 12.1(23), giving the following errors Aug 26 06:41:48.965: %PM_SCP-SP-6-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM: Module 9 is experiencing t e following error: Pinnacle #0, Frames with Bad Packet CRC Error

Re: [c-nsp] Fabric buffer-reserve high: what does it actually do?

Hi John, It will cause outdated settings on recent versions (that is, newer than SXF8 because SXF8 already includes a fix which makes fabric buffer-reserve command unnecessary) and by default, system settings are more optimal. This command was meant to be used long ago before the current default

Re: [c-nsp] Port Errors

Hi, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:16:32AM +0100, Harry Hambi wrote: I recently swapped out this module, the errors cleared for a while but have now started again. Any ideas appreciated. Sounds like bad packets are coming in on that port - so check the cable and the other end... gert -- USENET

Re: [c-nsp] Port Errors

-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Harry Hambi Sent: martedì 28 agosto 2012 11:17 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Port Errors Hi All, I have a module (16 SFM-capable 16 port

Re: [c-nsp] Port Errors

Hi All, I have a module (16 SFM-capable 16 port 10/100/1000mb RJ45) in a 6500 chasis running IOS Version 12.1(23), giving the following errors Aug 26 06:41:48.965: %PM_SCP-SP-6-LCP_FW_ERR_INFORM: Module 9 is experiencing t e following error: Pinnacle #0, Frames with Bad Packet CRC

[c-nsp] WAN PHY and OTN(G.709) modes

Is there any added value in running WAN PHY or OTN(G.709) modes on interfaces connected over a dark fiber please? Thanks adam ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] WAN PHY and OTN(G.709) modes

On 28/08/12 15:18, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: Is there any added value in running WAN PHY or OTN(G.709) modes on interfaces connected over a dark fiber please? OTN will give you ~6dB headroom due to the FEC. Of course, by the time you've paid your vendor a hojillion dollars for the license, you

Re: [c-nsp] Anycast-rp using PIM/RFC-4610 (not MSDP)

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Stafford Rau s...@rauhaus.org wrote: I'll be upgrading from NX-OS 5.1.4 to 5.2.5 this coming weekend, which may magically cure this problem. I'm not counting on it though. The upgrade to 5.2(5) does seem to have fixed this issue, no thanks to the Cisco TAC.

Re: [c-nsp] WAN PHY and OTN(G.709) modes

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Phil Mayers wrote: WAN PHY is only useful if you need to run over SDH, so not useful over dark fibre, as far as I can see. The B1/B2/B3 parity counters are useful even over dark fibre as it'll tell you if you're getting bit errors, even though that bit error didn't hit

Re: [c-nsp] Fabric buffer-reserve high: what does it actually do?

Hi Andras, Do you have a link to documentation/ddts that describes this change? Dale Thus spake John Neiberger (jneiber...@gmail.com) on Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:00:02PM -0600: An app owner (Oracle database) has recommended that we enable fabric buffer-reserve high to solve some Oracle

[c-nsp] Aruba AP70

Hey Guys Does anyone here are using Aruba 800 wireless controller and AP70 on their network ? I am setting this new wireless network with the above equipments. the wireless controllers are up on the network and i can ping them, HTTPS to them however i can not get the APs to register to the

Re: [c-nsp] UDP port 19 (chargen ) being punted to CPU ?

It turns out it is some bug with adding this single entry into a long ACL. Once we did a rebuild of ACL ( no access list foo then access-list foo ) all worked fine. The singe ACE entry was added about two weeks ago and just last week someone decided to poke at the port 19 and thats when we saw

Re: [c-nsp] Aruba AP70

This is a Cisco mailing list. There are aruba resources out there...I guess the wireless installation guide would help too...I'd also guess that they are work in a similar way to Cisco wifi you either have a DNS entry for the controller or give the info to the APs VIA DHCP alan

[c-nsp] PBR within MPLS VPN

As I sit and write this, this starts to sound stupid even to me. Just stick with it, please, THEN tell me I'm being stupid. :) So, device A is a cat6500/sup720, global IP 172.31.1.1/32, a PE device in an MPLS mesh. device B is a cat6500/sup720, global IP 172.31.1.14/32, PE device in another

Re: [c-nsp] PBR within MPLS VPN

Hi Bacon, For the PBR hardware switched or software switched, it depends, please check the detail as below website https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2017902 For the question which you raised Or can you not policy-route to a non-directly-connected PE over MPLS using PBR? The answer is, of

Re: [c-nsp] PBR within MPLS VPN

Hi Jeff, In some cases that we have required to do something like this we have used the command set vrf xyz within the route-map to push the traffic into a different VRF that then has a different routing table. regards, Tony. From: Jeff Bacon