Ivan,
On 17/09/2012 12:16, Ivan cisco-...@itpro.co.nz wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement to ensure all traffic across certain links have
particular CoS markings. Applying QoS polices on the links works but
doesn't capture router originated traffic - BGP, ARP, IPv6 ND etc.
As a potential
Dear Fellow nsp-members,
Do any of you have experience with a Chinese manufacturer of optical
transceivers named: Yoranco - www.yoranco.comhttp://www.yoranco.com/
They have quite a broad product portfolio and a very low price compared to
other manufacturers.
I don't know anything about their
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Hansen, Ulrich Vestergaard B. (E W EN RD DT ES 1 2) wrote:
Do any of you have experience with a Chinese manufacturer of optical
transceivers named: Yoranco - www.yoranco.comhttp://www.yoranco.com/
They have quite a broad product portfolio and a very low price compared
to
Hi,
Do any of you have experience with a Chinese manufacturer of optical
transceivers named: Yoranco - www.yoranco.comhttp://www.yoranco.com/
They have quite a broad product portfolio and a very low price compared to
other manufacturers.
got one of their emails today like I did? ;-)
all
On (2012-09-18 14:17 +0200), Hansen, Ulrich Vestergaard B. (E W EN RD DT ES 1
2) wrote:
Do any of you have experience with a Chinese manufacturer of optical
transceivers named: Yoranco - www.yoranco.comhttp://www.yoranco.com/
They have quite a broad product portfolio and a very low price
It's possible to extend the support for the non-E 6500s with something they
call Post Last Day of Support (Post-LDoS). Basically you have a price for
the service that is the double of a 6500-E. But you can have the non-E
supported until 31-Dec-2015.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
On 9/18/2012 10:16 AM, Antonio Soares wrote:
It's possible to extend the support for the non-E 6500s with something they
call Post Last Day of Support (Post-LDoS). Basically you have a price for
the service that is the double of a 6500-E. But you can have the non-E
supported until 31-Dec-2015.
I have an application where we are using DMVPN/NHRP for L3 type services,
however we require a setup where remote L2 bridging can be established to a
number of remote spokes, not all of which the IPv4 endpoint IP will be known in
advance.
Is it possible to use VPLS to achieve this,
My google fu has not turned up anything definitive on the 7600 PBR
performance, is it done in hardware
or is it down in software? With or without DFCs. Can anyone provide any
insight into sup720 PBR performance?
My feeling is if we enable PBR it may negatively impact the box, assume PBR
related
On Sep 18, 2012, at 10:56 AM, harbor235 wrote:
My google fu has not turned up anything definitive on the 7600 PBR
performance, is it done in hardware
or is it down in software? With or without DFCs. Can anyone provide any
insight into sup720 PBR performance?
On 18/09/12 17:56, harbor235 wrote:
My google fu has not turned up anything definitive on the 7600 PBR
performance, is it done in hardware
Hardware as long as you stick to supported match/set commands in the
route-map.
I can't remember off the top of my head, but IIRC some combinations can
On Sep 18, 2012, at 11:07 AM, harbor235 wrote:
Right, I saw that one, not sure exactly what it means, does it require DFCs,
we do not have DFCs so thats why I am a little gun shy.
The PFC and DFCs do basically the same thing, hardware switching. If on a
linecard, its called DFC. If on
Hi,
I have a ip local pool with lots of binding. My local pool is configured like
this:
ip local pool nationalarea_dyn_mi x.x.x.x x.x.x.x recycle delay 120
I would like to remove the recycle delay 120. Applying the line:
ip local pool nationalarea_dyn_mi x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
in the config remain
I found this, although it might be redundant to what others have already
sent you...
***
Policy-Based Routing TCAM and Adjacency Utilization
In Supervisor 2 with PFC2 and Supervisor 720 with PFC3, policy-based routing
(PBR) is fully
Also, there was an issue that I had last year when pbr'ing http traffic
towards a web cache at my boundary (pbr w/tracking on the ip next hop
towards web cache server) , that when the web cache went down I had a
persistant cpu high utilization issue on my 7609's (which adversely affected
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 19:32 +0200, Matteo Sgalaberni wrote:
ip local pool nationalarea_dyn_mi x.x.x.x x.x.x.x recycle delay 120
I would like to remove the recycle delay 120. Applying the line:
ip local pool nationalarea_dyn_mi x.x.x.x x.x.x.x
in the config remain the reclycle delay 120.
Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net writes:
On Sep 16, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
An extra knob, an extra data point to be collected, managed, (and possibly
get wrong) as a proxy for are you sure? [y/N] is a huge step away from
goodness.
Given that the consequences of
17 matches
Mail list logo
