Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-20 Thread Lars Christensen
Hi Joshua, You can't set a per interface MTU on the Nexus 5500-series switches. However, you can do it on per Class of Service. So in order to do increased MTU for your iSCSI traffic, you should create a policy-map identifying your iSCSI traffic, place the traffic in a separate queue with

Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-20 Thread Reuben Farrelly
I'd like to further clarify this - as I think the subtleties here between layer 2 and layer 3 MTU may be giving a misleading picture. The Layer 2 MTU (AKA frame size) is set globally, in the same way as on a Catalyst floor switch such as a 3560/3750 is done. This is performed by something

Re: [c-nsp] Giants and input errors but no MTU mismatch 7600-to-4948

2012-09-20 Thread Brian Turnbow
Hi, -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: mercoledì 19 settembre 2012 21:07 To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Giants and input errors but no MTU mismatch

Re: [c-nsp] ip local pool persistent binding

2012-09-20 Thread Matteo Sgalaberni
- Original Message - Try this to reset the recycle delay: ip local pool name start end recycle delay 0 It at least seems to remove the recycle delay part from config on a 1900 running 15.1(3)T1. Hi Peter, your hint worked great on my 7200 running 12.4(24)T6 and no IOS crash

Re: [c-nsp] VMware teaming Nic's and multiple switches

2012-09-20 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:13:22AM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote: You might not need MLAGs though. We run many stand-alone trunks from 3750 and 3560 switches to VMware ESX hosts and let the vSwitch on the host spread out the guests between these links and take care of failover. Since there

Re: [c-nsp] VMware teaming Nic's and multiple switches

2012-09-20 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 10:20 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: It's easy if one of the physical links goes down (do not use that!), but I'm thinking more about the uplink network getting partitioned, or one of the uplink switches failing in interesting ways (link still up, but no packets get

Re: [c-nsp] Any experience with DMVPN on ASR1K?

2012-09-20 Thread Nasir Shaikh
Thank you all for the valuable input. I have now ordered 2 asr1001 to replace my 7206vxr NPE-G2s. I only expect to service ~400 spokes per router so these routers with ESP 2.5 should be OK, I think. I am sticking to phase 2. I have split our global network into 4 regional (dual) DMVPNs with dual

Re: [c-nsp] Are Nexus and per-interface or FEX MTU settings possible?

2012-09-20 Thread Phil Mayers
On 09/20/2012 07:20 AM, Reuben Farrelly wrote: policy-map type network-qos enable-jumbo-frames class type network-qos class-default mtu 9216 system qos service-policy type network-qos enable-jumbo-frames Interesting. Does anyone know the rationale behind this way of setting the

[c-nsp] ASR 9K Broadband Licence??

2012-09-20 Thread Frank Norman
Dear friends, I need some clarification regarding running of broadband services on Cisco ASR 9006 router. As i understand ASR 9K can support maximum of 64k subscribers (although i don't see it any official datasheets, ASR 1K datasheet do mention limit of 64k). Document says that i need