I meant 255.0.255.255
sky
On 04/18/2013 10:40 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
You sure you didn't intend 255.255.255.0?
i.e. a /24 range?
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:21:17 -0700, sky vader wrote:
Hello,
when using the following mask errors out as bad mask when used on an
interface.
labasa(config-if)#
believe a miss is when we want a buffer of size X and there are no
more buffers of that size and use the next larger size.
Correct - and below you are seeing none from no memory (0 no memory).
From: Pete Lumbis alum...@gmail.com
To: Michael Sprouffske
Hello Friends,
Alcatel-Lucent has completed our project deployment IP/MPLS Backbone, 7750
SR7 - 7750 SR12, they suggest test plan but i am thinking if i can ad some
tests.
Test Strategy:
IGP, OSPF
MPLS, LDP+RSVP+ LSP Fast Reroute
VLL
VPLS
VPRN
Any idea to share, and test to add
your comment is
Your using an inverse / wildcard mask?
From: sky vader aptg...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 6:21 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] subnet mask confusion?
Hello,
when using the following mask errors out as bad mask when used on an
We have also the IOS XR 4.3 version which is stable so far.
Michalis Bersimis
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
I meant 255.0.255.255
If that's really what you intend, you need to turn off CIDR first.
Good luck.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
sky
On 04/18/2013 10:40 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
You sure you didn't intend 255.255.255.0?
i.e. a /24 range?
On Thu, 18 Apr
I guess this would work, if you match on outgoing interface?
route-map SP_A_NAT
match interface $MY_OUTGOING_INTERFACE
ip nat inside source 155.1.5.5 155.1.13.7 route-map SP_A_NAT
From: false jct...@yahoo.com
To: cisco mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:21:17PM -0700, sky vader wrote:
when using the following mask errors out as bad mask when used on an
interface.
labasa(config-if)# ip address 10.0.10.100 255.0.255.255
ERROR: Bad mask 255.0.255.255 for address 10.0.1.100
This is no longer meaningful, and
Yes it certainly should work, however I found that it doesn't always
work properly, specifically for SIP traffic (TCP and UDP traffic worked
fine). The SIP ALG is broken and you'll find traffic will exit one
interface but the SIP ALG will sometimes rewrite the SIP header to have
the other
I had an ALG bug which I raised with TAC, took 8 months and 4 TAC Engineers
(I use the word Engineers loosely) but finally they released an IOS with a
specific fix, we got there in the end.
On 19 April 2013 09:57, Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net wrote:
Yes it certainly should work,
It's still work in progress, though should be advertised throughout the
community as a starting point for everyone who's interested in applying
anti-spoofing measures in their networks.
http://www.bcp38.info/index.php/Main_Page
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp
Hi
I am search a solution for a xconnect between two interface:
I receive a Vlan 80:
interface TenGigabitEthernet5/1
no ip address
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
no ip route-cache
no cdp enable
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet5/1.80
encapsulation dot1Q 80
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:10:53PM +0200, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
I am search a solution for a xconnect between two interface:
It's called vlan...?
A Idea ? Thanks for your help
Create a vlan 80, make both parent interfaces a trunk and enable vlan 80
on them. Done. If you're using a
Hi,
Any reason why you're not using plain switchports and vlans? The 6500 is a
switch after all :-)
I am search a solution for a xconnect between two interface:
I receive a Vlan 80:
interface TenGigabitEthernet5/1
switchport
switchport mode trunk
swithport trunk allow vlan 80
I want
This is true about the misses. From my own experience and what others have told
me when a small or medium buffer is missed the frame/packet is usually dropped
and requires a retransmission. For me this is evident in my IP-video traffic
which suffers frame loss. Normal TCP traffic can just
On 19/04/2013 13:51, Sander Steffann wrote:
Any reason why you're not using plain switchports and vlans? The 6500 is
a switch after all :-)
... for the same reason you would want an mpls p/w instead of
point-to-point vlan for remote connectivity. I.e. no special hacks to
handle STP, local
Hello Ryan,
actually i didnt get your point , would you clarify it for me ?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Booth, Ryan rbo...@pantex.com wrote:
This is true about the misses. From my own experience and what others have
told me when a small or medium buffer is missed the frame/packet is
See the next post when he said it was posted to the wrong thread :)
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
On 19/04/2013 16:02, Ahmed Hilmy hilmy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ryan,
actually i didnt get your point ,
Hello Nick,
Thanks i didnt notice that !!!
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Nick Ryce n...@fluency.net.uk wrote:
See the next post when he said it was posted to the wrong thread :)
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845
Hello Friends,
Any idea about best journal that it is interested by Networking Stuff like
IP/MPLS/VPLS/VPRN etc
thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
I believe the 'connect' command should do the trick.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sb/feature/guide/28sblcl.html#wp1099309
Works well using the EVCs configurations.
On 4/19/2013 10:12 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 19/04/2013 13:51, Sander Steffann wrote:
Any reason why you're not
Hello,
I have an issue with a (refurbished) Sup720-2B. It does not load the IOS.
Chassis is a 6509, also tried a 6509-E and tried Slot 5 + 6 to make sure
the chassis is ok.
Few seconds after telling me to load the IOS it hangs:
System Bootstrap, Version 8.5(3)
How should an igmp querier be configured if the interface is also configured
for HSRP?
In NX-OS 6.1.2 you must explicitly configure an IP for the querier.
---
vlan configuration (vlan#)
ip igmp snooping querier A.B.C.D
--
Do I use the VIP IP or the interface IP.
We ran into an interesting problem last night and I'm a little stumped. It
appears that PIM did not follow a unicast routing change after a BGP peer
was shutdown. Imagine this simple topology:
[A] - [B] -- [C] --- [D]
|
|
|
[D]
Router A is a CRS and is forwarding PIM joins
Sorry for the shameless self promotion, but I wrote a command line tool
for config templates in Python recently.
https://github.com/verbosemode/ConfPlate
It is still a bit rough around the edges, but maybe you wanna give it a
try and provide valuable feedback to the author ;-)
Best regards,
Hi,
We currently have a number of netflow collectors local to our Netflow
exporters(7200's and ASR's) - A suggestion has been raised(To save costs) to
have a single collector and all our Netflow exporters send netflow data to it.
Latency to this proposed collector would range from a couple of
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater
jf...@princeton.edu wrote:
How should an igmp querier be configured if the interface is also
configured for HSRP?
vlan configuration (vlan#)
ip igmp snooping querier A.B.C.D
--
Do I use the VIP IP or the interface IP.
What are you doing with the data?
In past roles we've had central collectors 400ms away from exports (UK) as
the data was only for support\ease of troubleshooting purposes. The data
was classified\tagged\queued etc in a particular way to travel across the
WAN along with voice and other business
28 matches
Mail list logo
