Re: [c-nsp] NTP message sent to 224.0.1.1, from interface 'NULL' (0.0.0.0).

2013-07-04 Thread Victor Sudakov
Pete Lumbis wrote: It sounds like NTP may be stuck in broadcast mode for some reason. I'd suggest either calling TAC or issuing no ntp to completely disable the service then reconfigure the ntp server commands. Resetting the ntp process by issuing no ntp and then reapplying the ntp server

Re: [c-nsp] CISCO ME3600X ARP ISSUE

2013-07-04 Thread Antonis Vosdoganis
I have reboot the me3600x and now is replying back to arp requests. Thank you all for your help. Antonis. On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Randy randy_94...@yahoo.com wrote: I think the shut/no shut on 3600 is a red herring and if you take a closer look at patton and the link/switch in

Re: [c-nsp] NTP message sent to 224.0.1.1, from interface 'NULL' (0.0.0.0).

2013-07-04 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 04:17:55PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: However, when I apply the following command to the interface: interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ntp multicast ttl 1 the routers again begins sending multicast NTP packets with ttl=28. What gives? Don't do this, then If

Re: [c-nsp] NTP message sent to 224.0.1.1, from interface 'NULL' (0.0.0.0).

2013-07-04 Thread Victor Sudakov
Gert Doering wrote: However, when I apply the following command to the interface: interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ntp multicast ttl 1 the routers again begins sending multicast NTP packets with ttl=28. What gives? Don't do this, then If you really care, open a TAC case, get

[c-nsp] Static Route

2013-07-04 Thread M K
I have two routers connected to each other , I have configured a loopback interface on The second router and configured a static route to reach it , now when i shutdown the loopback interface the static route is still in the routing table , how can i remove that route automatically when i lose

[c-nsp] Testing Tools

2013-07-04 Thread alberto martin
Broadcast Flooder http://spench.net/drupal/software/netflood - ALberto ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] Static Route

2013-07-04 Thread Randy
From: M K gunner_...@live.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 5:03 AM Subject: [c-nsp] Static Route I have two routers connected to each other , I have configured a loopback interface on The second router

Re: [c-nsp] Static Route

2013-07-04 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 04/07/2013 13:03, M K wrote: I have two routers connected to each other , I have configured a loopback interface on The second router and configured a static route to reach it , now when i shutdown the loopback interface the static route is still in the routing table , how can i remove that

Re: [c-nsp] Drop rule at the end of CoPP conflicts with MAC learning

2013-07-04 Thread William McCall
Rolf-- I'd take a netdr capture and maybe an ELAM capture of the arp reply. If it doesn't show in the netdr, it was killed off in HW. ELAM *may* give you some additional insight. Btw, are you running with DFCs? If so, the DFCs do the HWRL/CoPP from the HW perspective. --WM On 07/01/2013

Re: [c-nsp] Sup-720 fabric failures

2013-07-04 Thread Pete Lumbis
Robert, You probably have bad hardware but two sups both being bad sounds a little suspect. This matches CSCtx83944 a little bit. Would you be willing to supply me the serial numbers of the failed modules? Otherwise, it's probably worth it to open a case with TAC and see what they say. My guess