Hi,
do we need a licence for nV Edge functionality for RSP 440 and MOD80 LC?
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
i told last time they cannot load-sharing traffic for mc-lag, not sure now
can support or not.
another thing is that if you previous have
hi
To get IPV6 to work, you need to load the correct SDM template and reload
the switches.
Then you need to enable ipv6 unicast-routing on all devices.
There is no anything else apart from configuring IPV6 addresses that you
need to do, if all you want to do is to ping.
You should be able to
I am just as dense.
Why would you need to load the SDM template if you only want the switch to
provide L2 connectivity?
Sent from a mobile device
On 28 Nov 2013, at 19:32, Jeyamurali Sivapathasundaram
sjeyamur...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
To get IPV6 to work, you need to load the correct
Hi,
my router has 2 BGP sessions with the same IPv4 neighbor A.B.C.D.: one
session under address-family IPv4, one session under address-family IPv6.
Is there any reason for the router to clear both sessions if I only
issue clear bgp ipv6 unicast A.B.C.D ?
Just the IPv6 session is supposed to be
Am 27.11.2013 18:17, schrieb Calin C.:
I did encounter this message only with HSRP and there the problem was
that IPv6 requires version 2 and IPv4 works fine with version 1.
For GLBP...please let me know if you find the answer.
Yep, unfortunately the ME platform doesn't support IPv6 with
Have you tried to use the same HSRP group number for IP and IPv6
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Gerald Krause g...@ax.tc wrote:
Hi,
we need a FHRP that support IPv4 and IPv6 one some ME3400s in our
network. The documentation state that GLBP would do that on the MEs but
it seems
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:19:58AM +0100, Antonio Prado wrote:
my router has 2 BGP sessions with the same IPv4 neighbor A.B.C.D.: one
session under address-family IPv4, one session under address-family IPv6.
Your router only has a single session, but uses this to transport both
address
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:35:38AM +, Jeyamurali Sivapathasundaram wrote:
Have you tried to use the same HSRP group number for IP and IPv6
Won't work, even on those platforms that actually *do* support HSRP
for IPv4 *and* for IPv6 *and* at the same time.
Makes me wonder why I
Am 28.11.2013 10:36, schrieb Jeyamurali Sivapathasundaram:
I mean same GLBP group number ?
Yep, within the same group number the error is ipv4 already configured
for this group.
Gerald
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
My experience with Cisco IPv6 is limited but I believe you can't even
configure a v6 address until you have the IPv6 SDM template loaded.
On Nov 28, 2013 12:39 AM, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:
I am just as dense.
Why would you need to load the SDM template if you only want the switch
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Bill Blackford wrote:
My experience with Cisco IPv6 is limited but I believe you can't even
configure a v6 address until you have the IPv6 SDM template loaded.
You don't need to have an IPv6 address on an L2 switch, to L2 switch
0x86dd ethertype frames.
--
Mikael
Hi
I have a query on IP FRR , Based on RFC 5286 for link protection if my topology
is such that we are meeting the inequality 1 but not inequality 2 , then will
the destination considered as backup path ??
Are both inequality 1 inequality 2 are mandatory to meet the link protection
or
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:34:49PM +0100, Antonio Prado wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 28/11/13 12:56, Gert Doering wrote:
Your router only has a single session, but uses this to transport
both address family. (I'd not do it that way, but it can be
done).
yes per RFC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/11/13 12:56, Gert Doering wrote:
Your router only has a single session, but uses this to transport
both address family. (I'd not do it that way, but it can be
done).
yes per RFC 2283.
yes, of course one tcp connection.
Is there any reason
Il 28/11/13 14:11, Gert Doering ha scritto: yes, of course one tcp
connection.
So how would you clear only half of the TCP session?
no doubt, agree
I have to admit I'm not sure what it will do if you have multiple AFIs on one
session - whether it
will soft-clear all AFIs or just IPv6 then.
Am 28.11.2013 10:39, schrieb Jeyamurali Sivapathasundaram:
Anycast for IPv6 ?
Yep, we do this now and it works up to his limitations. But we would
prefer the use of an FHRP that support both IP versions with
(nearly) identical configuration and tuning options.
Gerald
yes, it needs, nVCluster License (A9K-NV-CLUSTR-LIC)
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:17 PM, jure brkljacic zblajh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
do we need a licence for nV Edge functionality for RSP 440 and MOD80 LC?
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
i told last
Hi
I am stuck in one of the scenario mention below:-
IGP is ISIS with default metric as 10
P1-P3
/| | \
PE1 PE2
\ | | /
P2--P4
P1 P2 - are ALU core devices
P3 P4 - are Cisco
On 11/27/13, 9:47 PM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 09:50:16 PM Phil Bedard
wrote:
Cisco seems to have abandoned the concept of putting the
optics on the router, because the density isn't there.
That's always been the rub with colored/tunable
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 03:00:57 PM Mikael
Abrahamsson wrote:
You don't need to have an IPv6 address on an L2 switch,
to L2 switch 0x86dd ethertype frames.
But you might want one for remote management of the device.
I can see why having to go through the trouble setting up
SDM
20 matches
Mail list logo
