Hey,
Trying to configure sampled v9 netflow with 15.1S on 7201 and I can't
make it sampled, still 1:1.
What I'm missing?
flow exporter AS-STATS
destination 10.10.90.5
transport udp 9000
!
flow monitor IPv4
record netflow ipv4 original-input
exporter AS-STATS
cache timeout active 300
!
Hi Amit,
Not sure which router(s) is/are D(destinations) in your calculations.
I rather refer to inequality 3 and its clear explanation in particular.
Distance_opt(N, D) Distance_opt(N, E) + Distance_opt(E, D)
If Distance_opt(N,D) = Distance_opt(N, E) + Distance_opt(E, D), it is
Hi Amit,
Now I guess I see what you mean.
Well I don't see a reason for inequality 2 to hold true.
The only rule should be that N is not considering S as possible next hop
towards D (i.e. going backwards creating loop) if that holds true that N is
a LFA on the path from S to D.
adam
On Nov 29, 2013, at 4:24 PM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
flow monitor IPv4
record netflow ipv4 original-input
exporter AS-STATS
cache timeout active 300
flow monitor IPv6
record netflow ipv6 original-input
exporter AS-STATS
cache timeout active 300
Your active timers should
On 29/11/13 14:37, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Nov 29, 2013, at 4:24 PM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
flow monitor IPv4
record netflow ipv4 original-input
exporter AS-STATS
cache timeout active 300
flow monitor IPv6
record netflow ipv6 original-input
exporter AS-STATS
cache
Hey Adam
Thanks a lot!!
From: Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk
To: 'Dhamija Amit' amiitdham...@yahoo.com; 'Phil Bedard' phil...@gmail.com;
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 3:38 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Difference in IP FRR Link
On Nov 29, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
So this is apply to any sampled netflow?
Any NetFlow, sampled or non-sampled.
Set the active timer to 60s, and the inactive timer to 5s.
c7201(config-if)#ip flow monitor IPv4 sampler SM input
On 29/11/13 14:59, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
Any NetFlow, sampled or non-sampled.
Set the active timer to 60s, and the inactive timer to 5s.
Even when you draw graph in 5 min interval? As lowering values means
more flows exported per min so more load.
c7201(config-if)#ip flow monitor IPv4
On Nov 29, 2013, at 4:24 PM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
flow-sampler-map SM
mode random one-out-of 100
flow-sampler-map SM
mode random 1 out-of 100
Try that with this:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
ip address 10.10.112.143 255.255.255.0
ipv6 address 2001:db8:20:101::99/64
ip
On Nov 29, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
Even when you draw graph in 5 min interval?
Yes. Your graphs will be way off unless you bring the active timer down to
60s, irrespective of graph resolution.
You should also consider graphing with 1-minute intervals, it's
Hi
a small question :
i have a cisco 6503 with sup720, on this 6503, i have a interface:
interface GigabitEthernet3/1.500
encapsulation dot1q 500
interface GigabitEthernet3/1.501
encapsulation dot1q 501
i want a ethernet link between vlan 500 and 501
it's possible ?
thanks Olivier
Cant you just route between the two? What are you trying to do?
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 16:41:56 +0100
From: o.calv...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Vlan ?
Hi
a small question :
i have a cisco 6503 with sup720,
Local Connect?
Try This:
connect gig 3/1.500 gig3/1.501
Jon Harald Bøvre
- Opprinnelig melding -
Fra: Olivier CALVANO o.calv...@gmail.com
Sendt: 29.11.2013 16:50
Til: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:41:56PM +0100, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
a small question :
i have a cisco 6503 with sup720, on this 6503, i have a interface:
interface GigabitEthernet3/1.500
encapsulation dot1q 500
interface GigabitEthernet3/1.501
encapsulation dot1q 501
i want a
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 06:07:20PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:41:56PM +0100, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
i want a ethernet link between vlan 500 and 501
it's possible ?
Not with generic LAN hardware, unless you do nasty workarounds
int gig3/2
swi access vlan
On 29/11/2013 17:07, Gert Doering wrote:
int gig3/2
swi access vlan 500
int gig3/3
swi access vlan 501
if you're going to do that, you can use vlan rewrite. Just beware of port
group limitations if you're doing vlan rewrite on other ports.
Nick
Anyway, if you go down this path by connecting vlans together using
connect or vlan rewrite
Be aware of what could happen it you send STP BPDU's across
You might see ports errdisabled, STP inconsistent or similar messages on
the access switch
CDP might also start complaining.
Jon H Bøvre
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:15 -0600, Doug McIntyre wrote:
At which point it is better to collapse VLAN 500 and 501 together, so
you don't depend on one weird odd thing in the network holding it
together, and when somebody goes and says WTF, and undoes the oddness,
that everything doesn't just
Hi I have two unequal cost paths to reach a specific destinationI configured
variance and the two routes are installed in the routing tableHow can I use the
low cost always with keeping the other one installed in the routing table ?
- Original Message -
From: M K gunner_...@live.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 1:55 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] EIGRP Variance
Hi I have two unequal cost paths to reach a specific destinationI configured
variance and the
Hi RandyI know what the variance command does and know how to manipulate I was
challenged to do what I asked without using any filtering or touch the variance
command configured
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:35:22 -0800
From: randy_94...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP Variance
To:
Hi Randy
I know what the variance command does and know how to manipulate
I was challenged to do what I asked without using any filtering or touch the
variance command configured
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:35:22 -0800
From: randy_94...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP Variance
To:
22 matches
Mail list logo
