Hi,
15.3.3S3 is nice and stable and supports all you required :)
Cheers,
James.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 11 September 2013 17:15, Eric Van Tol e...@atlantech.net wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit confused about the documentation for the ME3600 with regard to its
MPLS-TE support. Specifically, the 'MPLS TE' section
On 05/09/2014 10:10, James Bensley wrote:
Does anyone know if ME3x00's support MPLS-TE FRR over SVIs
no, definitely not yet on SVIs. Dunno about etherchannels.
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 2014-09-04 19:16, Aaron wrote:
In my network traceroute works fine for on-net (known) subnets. I can
see
the mpls lsr P hops.
But when I traceroute to internet destinations off-net (unknown)
subnets and
my packets follow default routing, I do not see my mpls lsr P hops.
What is the
Hello.
The feeling we have had is that mostly it's the tri-rate copper SFPs that is
causing the frustration.
Same with ASR1001. Never had an issue with optical fixed rate modules though.
Bästa hälsningar / Best regards,
Gustav Uhlander
Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer
Steria AB
On 04/09/2014 19:41, Aaron wrote:
after typing that global command, just shut/no shut the port and it should
immediately start working. you won't need to reboot me3600 nor will you
need to reinsert the sfp. it will work.
that usually works, but occasionally an ME3600 will get confused and
123.123.144.1 is one of my l3vpn customer subnets and I can trace to it and see
all my mpls p hops along the way... (mpls p boxes are 172.20.x.x) (not sure why
the penultimate hop times out but perhaps that's another topic)
C:\tracert -d -w 1 123.123.144.1
Tracing route to 123.123.144.1
Hi Waris,
I have sent you an off list response. On-list thought, I agree lots of BGP
sessions to ME series is bad but there isn't much we can do facing the
customer because OptB isn't secure.
Cheers,
James.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Do you have the 434 SMU for CSCum44940 (AA08480) installed on the device?
Thanks
Praveen
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Rimestad, Steinar
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 3:29 AM
To: Mathieu Paonessa; Richard Hartmann;
On 4 September 2014 09:41, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
If BGP could send VLAN in NLRI, then we'd only need 1 BGP session
Indeed something like this would be great. Option D is the closest we can get;
I haven't tried in the lab yet but I wonder if it's possible using
Cisco Opt A+B down to a
Firstly you have to decide if you want a hidden or visible MPLS core
(propagate ttl). If you actually want a visible P-core by design then you
might want to pop the ttl-labels mid-path.
The issue is the router/fw at the end of the LSP might not have a route
back or is actually dropping the
On 2014-09-05 15:41, Aaron wrote:
123.123.144.1 is one of my l3vpn customer subnets and I can trace to
it and see all my mpls p hops along the way... (mpls p boxes are
172.20.x.x) (not sure why the penultimate hop times out but
perhaps that's another topic)
(1) You are sure that
We have been running the fix since the beginning of this week with no
issues.
Would recommend you check out the other available SMUs for 4.3.4
proactively.
tv
On 9/5/2014 7:56 AM, Praveen Sharma (psharma) wrote:
Do you have the 434 SMU for CSCum44940 (AA08480) installed on the device?
I am looking for some fiber cable guides like the Cisco ones here
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/i/31-40/360001-37/363001-364000/363563.eps/_jcr_content/renditions/363563.jpg
(These ones are for Cisco ONS.
Hi Jared,
This is something I have also been looking at. Is there any particular
brand of XFP you have had success with?
If we take the Cisco 80km ZR we have TX 0 to 4 dBm and RX -7 to -24
dBm - worst case 24dB budget excluding splices, patches etc. Assuming
0.2dB/km 120km would be right
15 matches
Mail list logo
