Did you get the 24 port versions, we are going to start evaluation on
these soon, hopefully worth the wait!
Cheers,
James.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Hello list,
We are looking at upgrading a number of boxes to 5.1.3 as it's the
recommended release in the 5.1.x train and would like to hear any
thoughts from those running it on it's stability.
We're running dual stack ISIS,MP-BGP,LDP,MPLS-TE, vpls.
Regards,
Alfred Wandati
There are a number of SMUs you should load if using 5.1.3, I don't think they
all have been posted publicly.
Happy to provide you a list in private.
Jared Mauch
On Nov 24, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Alfred Wandati wandati.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
We are looking at upgrading a number
Did you get the 24 port versions, we are going to start evaluation on
these soon, hopefully worth the wait!
Hi James,
No, we got the 12-port version because at the time we ordered, the 24-port
hadn't been officially announced and was not shipping yet. I played around
with it over the weekend
On Monday, November 24, 2014 03:43:05 PM Eric Van Tol wrote:
If anyone else has any information to share about the ASR
920, either privately or to the list, please let me
know.
Reach out to Waris for more details. He's always helpful
with this, as we're also doing the same re: this platform.
Hello.
We are looking into this plattform as a highend CPE so we would also be
interested in such information if available.
Bästa hälsningar / Best regards,
Gustav Uhlander
Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer
Steria AB
Kungsbron 13
Box 169
SE-101 23 Stockholm
Sweden
Tel: +46 8
Hi all,
We’ve got an A9K MPLS core that we do all sorts of fun stuff on, including LSM.
Yay for a PIM-free core!
We’ve also got a whack of ME3600 PEs in ring that hang off of the A9Ks. Also
fully MPLS enabled; all L3 ME3600 and A9K core. While looking to bring
multicast out to these ME3600
If you don't need segmentation I don't see the benefit of moving to mVPN.
Only consider if you think there will be segmentation needs in the future.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
Hi all,
We’ve got an A9K MPLS core that we do all sorts of fun stuff on,
On Monday, November 24, 2014 11:08:04 PM Jason Lixfeld
wrote:
In order to do MVPN, we’d have to enable PIM between the
ME3600s and the A9Ks anyway, so since this is all in a
common VRF, is there really any benefit to doing MVPN?
You never know when your Multicast services will extend to
Hi Eric, Gustav,
I will be happy to help you with any information that you may need. Can you
please unicast your requirements and questions? I will work with the team to
get you the data.
Thanks,
Ramji
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Hello everybody,
Although I have “no hello padding” configured, the adjacency won't come up
until I limit the CLNS MTU on some link in my network (there is an MTU
issue on that link, it's not 1500).
As far as I remember, Cisco IOS implementation of IS-IS will *still send
out first* IIHs padded,
11 matches
Mail list logo