Re: [c-nsp] ASR920

2014-11-24 Thread James Bensley
Did you get the 24 port versions, we are going to start evaluation on these soon, hopefully worth the wait! Cheers, James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

[c-nsp] ASR9K XR 5.1.3 Experience

2014-11-24 Thread Alfred Wandati
Hello list, We are looking at upgrading a number of boxes to 5.1.3 as it's the recommended release in the 5.1.x train and would like to hear any thoughts from those running it on it's stability. We're running dual stack ISIS,MP-BGP,LDP,MPLS-TE, vpls. Regards, Alfred Wandati

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9K XR 5.1.3 Experience

2014-11-24 Thread Jared Mauch
There are a number of SMUs you should load if using 5.1.3, I don't think they all have been posted publicly. Happy to provide you a list in private. Jared Mauch On Nov 24, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Alfred Wandati wandati.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list, We are looking at upgrading a number

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920

2014-11-24 Thread Eric Van Tol
Did you get the 24 port versions, we are going to start evaluation on these soon, hopefully worth the wait! Hi James, No, we got the 12-port version because at the time we ordered, the 24-port hadn't been officially announced and was not shipping yet. I played around with it over the weekend

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920

2014-11-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, November 24, 2014 03:43:05 PM Eric Van Tol wrote: If anyone else has any information to share about the ASR 920, either privately or to the list, please let me know. Reach out to Waris for more details. He's always helpful with this, as we're also doing the same re: this platform.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920

2014-11-24 Thread Gustav UHLANDER
Hello. We are looking into this plattform as a highend CPE so we would also be interested in such information if available. Bästa hälsningar / Best regards, Gustav Uhlander Senior Communication Infrastructure Engineer Steria AB Kungsbron 13 Box 169 SE-101 23  Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8

[c-nsp] MVPN vs. plain-old-multicast

2014-11-24 Thread Jason Lixfeld
Hi all, We’ve got an A9K MPLS core that we do all sorts of fun stuff on, including LSM. Yay for a PIM-free core! We’ve also got a whack of ME3600 PEs in ring that hang off of the A9Ks. Also fully MPLS enabled; all L3 ME3600 and A9K core. While looking to bring multicast out to these ME3600

Re: [c-nsp] MVPN vs. plain-old-multicast

2014-11-24 Thread Pete Lumbis
If you don't need segmentation I don't see the benefit of moving to mVPN. Only consider if you think there will be segmentation needs in the future. On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote: Hi all, We’ve got an A9K MPLS core that we do all sorts of fun stuff on,

Re: [c-nsp] MVPN vs. plain-old-multicast

2014-11-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday, November 24, 2014 11:08:04 PM Jason Lixfeld wrote: In order to do MVPN, we’d have to enable PIM between the ME3600s and the A9Ks anyway, so since this is all in a common VRF, is there really any benefit to doing MVPN? You never know when your Multicast services will extend to

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920

2014-11-24 Thread Ramji Vasudevan (ramji)
Hi Eric, Gustav, I will be happy to help you with any information that you may need. Can you please unicast your requirements and questions? I will work with the team to get you the data. Thanks, Ramji -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On

[c-nsp] Cisco IIH padding

2014-11-24 Thread Alex K.
Hello everybody, Although I have “no hello padding” configured, the adjacency won't come up until I limit the CLNS MTU on some link in my network (there is an MTU issue on that link, it's not 1500). As far as I remember, Cisco IOS implementation of IS-IS will *still send out first* IIHs padded,