Hello
We have a number of those connected and in use.
We use the EHWIC-4G-LTE-G version of it.
The only complaint we have is that the connection sometimes suffer from
packetloss and a reboot is required to clear it up.
Although we haven't done any more in-depth analysis of it since the nature
Hi Chris,
I have a number of the EHWIC-4G-LTE-G models running, mostly as redundant
connections.
I found them to be extremely reliable in terms of no lockups and reconnecting
without issue, but after running for a while they seem to slow. For example,
after a few days of running the speed
On 09/12/2014 20:39, Murat Kaipov wrote:
Hello Marco.
Keep in mind that ME3600/ME3800 platforms doesn't support BFD offload, and
all BFD packets processed by CPU.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/r
Hi James,
Does Cisco IOS not support more typical wholesale LAC features
operting on the output of RADIUS and also supporting the concept of
query RADIUS IP 1.1.1.1 for all @domain1.net user and query RADIUS
2.2.2.2 for all @domain2.net user queries?
I believe this is more easily handled
After a tea break I have seen that those AV pairs are having no affect.
Switching to the correct ones was a good idea ;)
#example.net Cleartext-Password := cisco
#Service-Type = Outbound-User,
#Cisco-AVPair = vpdn:tunnel-type=l2tp,
#Cisco-AVPair += vpdn:tunnel-id=lns-provider1,
#
I threw this issue out to the Cisco BBA mailing list too but that list
is much more scarcely used so I will re-post here:
I have read through the following pages, everything seems pretty
strait forward however my lab LAC still isn't working correctly:
Hi James,
What happens is a PPPoE request comes in to the LAC from the CPE with
CHAP authentication containing hostname testu...@example.net. The
LAC sends an access-request to the lab RADIUS server just for
example.net, RADIUS responds with access-accept and the details to
initiate the
Hello all,
Nexus 7k running 6.1(4a), trying to use ethanalyzer to troubleshoot an
issue with gratuitous ARPs. I'm seeing some weird behavior, and thought
I'd see if these are known issues, or if there were general
tips/feedback on using the feature.
First, sometimes it looks like the
Hello group.
I have a very short window to teach myself how to configure a Cisco 4500x.
Although I am no expert, I am familiar enough with other Catalyst switches to
satisfy our networking needs. However, I have not touched a 4500x before.
The goal is to (as soon as possible) take numerous
Just a guess, try making sure mpls ip is either enabled or disabled on both
ports. g0/24 does not have it enabled, so I'm pretty sure your mpls ldp
won't be up either.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Marco Marzetti ma...@lamehost.it wrote:
On 09/12/2014 20:39, Murat Kaipov wrote:
Hello
Looks pretty good. Does ospf neighbor come up?
11 Дек 2014 г. 3:27 пользователь FF fusionf...@gmail.com написал:
Just a guess, try making sure mpls ip is either enabled or disabled on
both ports. g0/24 does not have it enabled, so I'm pretty sure your mpls
ldp won't be up either.
On Wed,
Marco,
Are you using NSF/SSO on the C6500 devices? If yes, please check the
restrictions regarding the use of BFD and NSF.
Regards,
Alessandro
On Dec 9, 2014 5:49 PM, Murat Kaipov mkkai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Marco.
Keep in mind that ME3600/ME3800 platforms doesn't support BFD offload,
Hello Marco, can you show Ip ospf interface on both sides?
11 Дек 2014 г. 4:47 пользователь Мурат Каипов mkkai...@gmail.com
написал:
Looks pretty good. Does ospf neighbor come up?
11 Дек 2014 г. 3:27 пользователь FF fusionf...@gmail.com написал:
Just a guess, try making sure mpls ip is
I think the LAC will always send those two requests and will take what it
likes better; in this case, a good old non-L2TP PPPoE.
Don't use the same radius server for LAC and LNS, or at least, make sure
testu...@example.net authenticates only when the NAS is the LNS, but not
when the LAC is
14 matches
Mail list logo
