Why on earth would anything that was supposed to work actually work...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:23 PM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
>
> Action=CREATE Proto=ipv4. Cerr='FIB' detected the 'warning' condition
> 'Unsupported operation' : fib_mgr :
wow, check out the interface names at the bottom of the list, yeah the names
that start with "H" !!
RP/0/RP0/CPU0:eng-lab-5001-1#sh ip int br
Mon Feb 1 15:37:16.489 CST
Interface IP-Address Status Protocol Vrf-Name
Loopback0 10.101.12.244 Up Up default
TenGigE0/0/0/0 unassigned Shutdown Down
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, Aaron wrote:
wow, check out the interface names at the bottom of the list, yeah the names
that start with "H" !!
Kind of surprising. Thinking of the Nexus world, all Ethernet interfaces
are named "Ethernet." regardless of speed. It seems like other
vendors are
"640GbE ought to be enough for anybody"
On Monday, February 1, 2016, Steve Mikulasik
wrote:
> In the future when kids are complaining that the multi Tbps wifi is slow
> we will tell them that back in our day we had 100Gbe and we liked it!
>
>
> -Original
I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong here or if i'm running into on
mpls l3vpn/vrf issue. (I already have igp, mpls, and mp-bgp config'd and
working)
I create the vrf... add an interface to it... config the bgp vrf stanza,
commit, then suddenly I get errors on the screen. my l3vpn ip
It's amazing right?
How old school now seem the LC with 1x 100GE port (like what am I supposed to
do with that crap).
Now there are 10x 100GE port LCs, and soon there will be 20 or 24port 100GE
cards introduced -like there used to be 24x10GE not that long time ago.
Regarding the Wi-Fi:
If we
In the future when kids are complaining that the multi Tbps wifi is slow we
will tell them that back in our day we had 100Gbe and we liked it!
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 3:24 PM
To:
Yeah, it's called IOS-XR, has existed for 4-5? years.
Phil
From: Aaron
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 4:52 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab
wow, check out the interface names at the bottom of the list, yeah the names
that start with "H"
Action=CREATE Proto=ipv4. Cerr='FIB' detected the 'warning' condition
'Unsupported operation' : fib_mgr : (PID=7989) :
Looks like the routing process had some troubles carving up VRF one IPv4 table
in the FIB.
-it's most likely a bug
-but hey it's just a warning condition :)
adam
>
Some of y'all might be used to these really fat interfaces, not in my little
ol' world... hundred gige was surprising! That's all I was saying...
Thanks Justin
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Justin M. Streiner
Sent:
> I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong here or if i'm running into on
> mpls l3vpn/vrf issue. (I already have igp, mpls, and mp-bgp config'd and
> working)
Aaah, thats 2 hours from "sweet" to "issue" :)
> I create the vrf... add an interface to it... config the bgp vrf stanza,
> commit,
Y'all are a hoot...
My Cisco SE just told me that the base release of this NCS-5001 that I have
doesn't support L3VPN until the end of this month. I'll move on to testing
L2VPN til then...
Thanks gents
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:ja...@lixfeld.ca]
Sent:
Funny Time
That reminds me…
http://www.seeren.org/seeren1/content/news/docs/IPv6theory-transition-currentstatus-DimitriosKalogeras.pdf
http://www.rinkworks.com/said/predictions.shtml
From: Tim Durack [mailto:tdur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2016 4:52 PM
To: Steve
Thanks in advance
Now what is the case for WS-6908-10G-2TXL ? I searched the Internet but I
could not find any information about Local Switching of this card.
The only available information is Fabric Switch Capacity which is 80Gbps.
Thank you again
-Original Message-
From: Paul
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 03:52:00PM -0600, Aaron wrote:
> wow, check out the interface names at the bottom of the list, yeah the names
> that start with "H" !!
So, how's XR 6.0 like? Is it true that it does no longer support EIGRP?
(The NCS5k feature list lists OSPF, ISIS etc., but EIGRP is
> On 2/02/2016, at 17:32, Erik Sundberg wrote:
>
> Here are some pictures of the ASR920 Console kit A920-CONS-KIT-S
>
>
> The Adapter Plugs in the Top Left USB Console Port and we have it wired up to
> a Perle IOLAN SCS48C console server using a rollover cable.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 12:12:12PM -0500, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>
> Kind of surprising. Thinking of the Nexus world, all Ethernet interfaces
> are named "Ethernet." regardless of speed.
Yea, that's one thing I really despise about Nexus. Seeing EthX/Y is really
boring (must be a
Here are some pictures of the ASR920 Console kit A920-CONS-KIT-S
The Adapter Plugs in the Top Left USB Console Port and we have it wired up to a
Perle IOLAN SCS48C console server using a rollover cable.
Here are some pictures of it, since I can only find a brief mention of it in
all the
18 matches
Mail list logo