Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

I am guessing with the RSP720 (vs the SUP720), you don’t have to worry about memory running out as quickly. Sure the TCAM will exhaust at some point, but at least you can upgrade the RAM to 4G if needed. Has anybody come up with a good guess as to what is a good division of the TCAM for

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow with nfsen issue

Nevermind, my bad following command works :) Thank you so much! R1#show flow monitor netflow-monitor cache sort highest counter packets top 2 Processed 77 flows Aggregated to 2 flows Showing the top 2 flows IPV4 SRC ADDRIPV4 DST ADDRTRNS SRC PORT TRNS DST PORT IP PROT bytes

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow with nfsen issue

I don't have (sh top talker ) command, We have ASR1006 R1#show top? topology R1#sh version Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 03.16.03.S - Extended Support Release Cisco IOS Software, ASR1000 Software (X86_64_LINUX_IOSD-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.5(3)S3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

Thanks, I plan on upgrading to SRE12 as well as repartioning the TCAM for now. On Jul 6, 2016 8:49 PM, "Howard Leadmon" wrote: Not that I am aware of, as I mentioned earlier, my SUP720-3BXL's are currently at 92% memory used, and I haven't had any problems at all with them

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

Not that I am aware of, as I mentioned earlier, my SUP720-3BXL's are currently at 92% memory used, and I haven't had any problems at all with them to date. Looking at jumping to RSP720's or some platform with more memory to stop future issues, but have never had problems sshing into the boxes..

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow with nfsen issue

Havent followed the entire thread, but you are using FNF correct? sh ip cache flow is for the "old style" (ip flow ingress) with FNF, there's a lot more flexibility to viewing flowsi.e. sh top talker sorted - show flow monitor cache sort highest counter packets top 20

[c-nsp] Etherchannel load-balacing change on live network

We have C3750 running src-mac etherchannel load-balancing, I want to change that to src-dst-ip base because its now routed switch (L3). Does it impact or affect any current traffic in order to change load-balancing? I believe its hardware base logic so doesn't impact on current traffic. In

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow with nfsen issue

Following command output is empty is that normal? Do you think that is because of Hardware base netflow, i meant its using CEF? R1#show ip cache flow On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Tom Hill wrote: > On 05/07/16 22:13, Satish Patel wrote: >> I found solution to fix

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow with nfsen issue

On 05/07/16 22:13, Satish Patel wrote: > I found solution to fix timestamp: > > I have added following to as per Peter said. > > collect timestamp sys-uptime first > collect timestamp sys-uptime last > > and change export fron ipfix to v9 > > Now i can see correct timestamp on Nfsen :) Thanks

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

4 million routes dynamically allocated. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Howard Leadmon Date: 7/6/16 12:54 AM (GMT-07:00) To: Mack McBride , 'Gert Doering' , 'Peter

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

So we know about the memory constraint on the 3BXLs but what happens if the memory usage actually hits 90%? Will the SUP still allow VTY sessions? I know on the NPEs for the 7200s once 90% is reached the router will rejecting all VTY attempts. On Jul 6, 2016 3:21 AM, "Gert Doering"

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 firmware bugs in 03.18.00.S / 15.6(2)S

On 07/04/2016 04:29 PM, Chris Welti wrote: Hi all, I can confirm that the bug has been fixed in 03.18.01.S / 15.6(2)S1 which is now out on CCO. Caution, after the first reload when you upgrade from a previous version, there will be a FPGA upgrade and thus a second (automatic) reboot.

Re: [c-nsp] CSCuy29638 - MPLS (for IPv4) Brokenness Fixed - ASR920

>Are you seeing this on one device, or across your entire ASR920 >backbone? > >Mark. Hi Mark, It occurred on two ASRs in our network, a 12CZ and a 4SZ, both at different times during the day. We made the decision to rollback all ASRs to their previous version, which was 3.16.1aS. We only

Re: [c-nsp] Default / catchall VPDN group for LNS

Awesome! Thanks James/Arie - Reason we have vpdn group per lac was purely legacy.this particular LNS has been doing this role for 10years+when it was first setup, carrier had probably 5 LAC's, supplied us with a config example for Cisco, which had the 5 LACs as separate vpdn groups,

Re: [c-nsp] Default / catchall VPDN group for LNS

Hmm, not sure why you have a VPDN group per LAC. On 6 July 2016 at 05:36, CiscoNSP List wrote: > vpdn-group 1 > ! Default L2TP VPDN group > accept-dialin > protocol l2tp > virtual-template 1 > local name LNS <- Can this be "anything"? > lcp renegotiation always

Re: [c-nsp] Default / catchall VPDN group for LNS

I am a bit rusty with vpdn-groups... Can you please share an example of 2 different groups and how they differ from each other? Basically, the most specific criteria is matched, but if you do not specify some criteria, it would "match any" Arie On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:37 AM CiscoNSP List

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

Hi, On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:26:39PM +, Mack McBride wrote: > For an IX, you might be better off with something like a white box switch > running custom code. Well, I'm not the IX operator, I'm just a participant - and it's tremendously helpful to know for sure *who* is sending you that

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

> Is there any place where they list how many routes the ASR9K will handle, > granted most of the current goodness is too rich for my blood, but stuff > like the RSP4G and RSP8G are pretty easy to come by.   I thought I saw > something saying they were limited to say 512K routes, but I may be

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options..

Is there any place where they list how many routes the ASR9K will handle, granted most of the current goodness is too rich for my blood, but stuff like the RSP4G and RSP8G are pretty easy to come by. I thought I saw something saying they were limited to say 512K routes, but I may be thinking of