Thanks, I plan on upgrading to SRE12 as well as repartioning the TCAM for now. On Jul 6, 2016 8:49 PM, "Howard Leadmon" <[email protected]> wrote:
Not that I am aware of, as I mentioned earlier, my SUP720-3BXL's are currently at 92% memory used, and I haven't had any problems at all with them to date. Looking at jumping to RSP720's or some platform with more memory to stop future issues, but have never had problems sshing into the boxes.. --- Howard Leadmon - [email protected] PBW Communications, LLC http://www.pbwcomm.com > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Curtis Piehler > Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 12:49 PM > To: Gert Doering <[email protected]> > Cc: Jon Lewis <[email protected]>; cisco-nsp <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP720's memory, looking at options.. > > So we know about the memory constraint on the 3BXLs but what happens if > the > memory usage actually hits 90%? Will the SUP still allow VTY sessions? I > know on the NPEs for the 7200s once 90% is reached the router will rejecting > all VTY attempts. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
