On 23/02/2023 19:32, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
Cisco have lost the plot, IMHO. Every solution at every level of the
network is now a bulldozer searching for a tiny nail to hammer.
Mark.
So well said.
-Hank
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On 2/23/23 21:45, Shawn L via cisco-nsp wrote:
That's one of the major reasons we're sticking with the ASR920 in metro
deployments for all it's faults. They do silly license stuff on the 12SZ
(no bulk, make all the 10G ports work license) but once you figure out
their quirks they do work
On 2/23/23 21:34, Phil Bedard wrote:
The original question was around an Internet border router with 10G
support. We have devices like the 55A2-MOD-SE which is similar to
some other vendor devices (somewhat of a reference Broadcom design)
which we’ve seen be very popular in border router
That's one of the major reasons we're sticking with the ASR920 in metro
deployments for all it's faults. They do silly license stuff on the 12SZ
(no bulk, make all the 10G ports work license) but once you figure out
their quirks they do work quite well.
We did just receive a 9901 (purchased 6
The original question was around an Internet border router with 10G support.
We have devices like the 55A2-MOD-SE which is similar to some other vendor
devices (somewhat of a reference Broadcom design) which we’ve seen be very
popular in border router deployments where you do not need a ton
On 2/23/23 19:20, Brian Turnbow wrote:
They also seem to want to follow the same route in metro with the NCS540s and
this global bandwidth licensing bucket.
You want to turn up 2x100 and 24*10 on a box?
Buy 44 "essential right to use v1 for 10g" and all the shabangs that come with
it that
Hi
>
> So if Cisco price themselves out of the market with their flagship Ethernet
> box
> - the ASR9000 - that just makes it easier for customers to consider Juniper,
> Arista, Nokia, e.t.c.
They also seem to want to follow the same route in metro with the NCS540s and
this global bandwidth
On 2/23/23 14:12, Alexandr Gurbo wrote:
For 10g speeds the best solution is a linux box and a contract with an anti
ddos partner.
Or even a server with a hypervisor running, say, CSR1000v or vMX or vSR
will do nicely. A little pricier than Linux, but likely worth it if you
have a decent
On 2/23/23 13:47, Gert Doering wrote:
Basically they have "fixed" that by making the ASR9901/9902/9903 even
more expensive.
And hence, why we consider other vendors.
I mean, the general rule for networking today, is Ethernet. Even in some
of the most far-flung regions of the world, one
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 09:40:26AM +0200, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
> The issue they face is Ethernet-centric platforms are much more
> optimized for today's Internet, and platforms like the ASR1000 simply
> don't make sense anymore. Why pay all that to get some Ethernet on an
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
