I configured a couple. They are fixed-config 4500s, so at 4500 feature set
is what I expected. That was also what I found.
-A
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: 20. december 2012 23:33
To:
Do you buy direct? Aren't prices available to direct customers?
If you buy through a partner, the partner can set you up for access to
prices.
-A
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard
Sent: 18.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:39:51 +0100, you wrote:
Can't buy direct in IE unless you're enormous.
Same here in DK.
If you buy through a partner, the partner can set you up for access to
prices.
Have tried that with previous partner, to no avail. Must try again and
see if I can get anywhere
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:22:10 -0400, you wrote:
I assume you're talking about the global price list. If you've got the
right CCO privileges, you can download it. It's updated daily. I think
you need 'reseller' or 'buys direct from Cisco' status to get access.
A partner can provide access to
Does any of you already heard about the successor of the RSP720
for the 7600 ?
I don't think it would make a lot of sense, and I don't think we'll ever see
one.
If they rebrand the Sup2T as RSP2T, they would have close to no supported
line cards (only 67xx without DFCs) and, specifically, all
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 11:00:40 +0200, you wrote:
Numer of trains is limited, development is more focused, and
the code reuse is progressing.
12.2SX next, please :-)
That's 15.0 SY
Well, I was asking for SX-for-6500 (SXI, SXJ), not whatever else
might be using an IOS called 12.2SX.
15.0 SY
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:10:26PM +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
Numer of trains is limited, development is more focused, and the code
reuse is progressing.
12.2SX next, please :-)
That's 15.0 SY
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
I think they have: Cloud Services Router 1000v...
I do wonder if that's just the Nexus 1000v with all the Procket code...
No, it's IOS XE as a VM.
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Just heard that Nexus7k SUP2 does not have CMP. According to Ron Fuller
and Tim Stevenson customers didn't need it. Here I was hoping we'd finally
start getting OOB for routers and switches.
You still get true OoB management on the N7K Sup2, just not the CMP
interface.
From the top of my
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:33:32 -0500, you wrote:
Anyone out there running the 6.x train on the 7k?? We need some features
that are available in 6.x, but realize how many additional features that
come along with new releases. Our list...
BGP
EIGRP
OTV
HSRP
VTP
VPC
Netflow
LACP
PIM
The
On Thu, 24 May 2012 08:19:40 -0600, you wrote:
Someone asked me how to do something very simple and I'm finding it
very difficult! He wants to do a show interface command and show
only lines with up or rate in it.
Put your regex in quotes:
sh int | i up|rate
-A
On Thu, 24 May 2012 20:30:40 +, you wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has any experience/tips/advice when running
Fibre Channel on the Nexus 5548UP platform.
Yeah, we have customers doing that and do that ourselves.
I've done a little bit of research, and understand that the FC ports
have
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but weren't these released in 2010?
Nah. They are 5-6 years old IIRC.
Are you sure? The only release bulletin I could find was from 2010 and
that's the year the EOS'd the non-E chassis.
December 2007:
They're dropping support for the redundant (7 and 10 slot) -E chassis for
the +E chassis (plus instead of minus). There is no change for the 4503-E
and 4506-E. The +E redundant chassis are different primarily in that they
support 48G/slot vs the 24G/slot in the older chassis.
The -E chassis
Peter,
A Cisco-branded 10Gbase-ZR X2 actually has a power budget of (at least) 24
dBm @ 1550 nm[1]. Get the fiber cleaned, re-spliced as you suggest, and
(re-)tested (to also check for dispersion). It's likely to work just fine.
I have a couple of customers running 'grey' links at significantly
Actually, the 7600 is in the ERBU, which also has the 9K, 10K, and 12K.
So, no BU cooperation needed ;-)
-A
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: 10. april 2012 16:54
To: Aaron
Cc:
You might be able to make that work in the lab, at least with 'switch trunk
allow' so that you don't bridge between the internal interfaces, and if you
make sure that you didn't have overlapping VLAN numbers to extend.
But I wouldn't consider it best practice.
The OTV VDC needs a site VLAN,
AFAIK, RHI is currently supported only in the 6500. If the 6500 has a Layer
3 interface into the VLAN, you can do RHI.
-A
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of henrry huaman
Sent: 11. maj 2012 21:02
To:
will be down as well).
(The OTV VDC can only have a single join interface).
-A
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Soares [mailto:amsoa...@netcabo.pt]
Sent: 15. maj 2012 18:32
To: 'Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists'
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OTV on-a-stick
Thanks
It may be working (but process-switched with poor performance and high
CPU) in some versions of code.
It's still unsupported.
-A
From: ar [mailto:ar_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 2:41 AM
To: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
Cc: 'cisco-nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3400 GRE
I'm looking to upgrade from SRC4 to SRE5 and I'm wondering if there
are any gotchas, hiccups or non-public bugs that anyone might have
experience with.
IMO, you should be looking at 15.0 S. It's going to have longer life than
SRE.
(Yes, do a bug scrub. Yes, test it.)
-A
I am using GRE on ME3400 with my Core 7600.
...
Any known issue with ME3400 metroipaccess IOS?
GRE (or any other tunnel type) is unsupported on the ME 3400,
regardless of the IOS feature set.
Unsupported Global Configuration Commands
interface tunnel
While IANA may not have allocated anything for private use, 65536-65551 are
reserved for documentation, and those are of cause 32-bit numbers.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/as-numbers.xml
(A separate ASN per site, however, makes little sense to me).
-A
-Original Message-
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:51:25 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
Getting various server side fails (file not availible, JAMon
PageRenderMonitor, etc). Just wanted to see if other folks are
having similar issue.
Yes, several things, including software downloads, have been totally
b0rken for the last
In other words, this this card capable of L2 local switching?
No.
or does every packet go to the sup and back?
Yes.
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:25:46 -0800, you wrote:
I see the Nexus 7000 does MPLS now (perhaps for some time?). Is there
anyone out there using MPLS on these and cares to comment about their
experience?
I'm particularly interested in RSVP, L3VPN support using OSPF as the
PE/CE protocol, any
Actually, FCoE is Single-Hop by standart.
Nonsense, the standards have been done for years. What constitutes
a FC hop is an ISL (FCF VE_Port to FCF VE_Port)... and yes that is
standardized for FCoE. See FC-BB-5.
Also if you already have non-Cisco FC Fabric, using Cisco Extenders
should be
Any experience on the operations side of things for the B22HP route?
More specifically, feedback on how TAC (HP and Cisco) would look, day
to day provisioning (risk to reloading an B22HP to the rest of the HP
Blade?)...etc
Support (functionality, troubleshooting) for the fabric extender is
Do you know what the limit to vlans on flexfabric is?
It depends on the software version, which may be why you see different
values different places.
The maximum in a FlexFabric module is 320 VLANs with VC 3.18. There
are other limits as to the number of VLANs in the VC domain, but that
is an
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:25:10 +0200, you wrote:
Well, If you carefully read FC-BB-5 ver. 1.03, you may see that each
Enode should be connected to Fibre Channel Forwarder. That is what I
mean.
Yeah, that's exactly what you get with multi-hop FCoE from Cisco (N5K
- N5K or N5K - N7K). So yes,
We have customers running the Nexus B22HP (Cisco/HP FEX) and it works pretty
well.
Flex-Whatever sucks. Bowling balls through straws. It's a switch, but not a
switch. It doesn't do QoS. (Flex-NIC bandwidth-limitations work only in one
direction). It doesn't do multi-hop FCoE (no FCoE out of the
I agree that it should be default these days (it is in XR NX-OS),
Honestly, if you guys were to get into changing the defaults, I
think no ip proxy-arp should really be top of the list ;o)
That too is off by default in XR and NX-OS.
-A
___
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:51:40 +0200, you wrote:
I agree that it should be default these days (it is in XR NX-OS),
Honestly, if you guys were to get into changing the defaults, I
think no ip proxy-arp should really be top of the list ;o)
That too is off by default in XR and NX-OS.
For ASR
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:56:28 +, you wrote:
Does anybody know that absolute answer, if a 3750X can or
cannot stack with a 3750 or 3750E ?
Can.
If you stack 3750-X with -X og -E, it will run StackWise Plus. If you
stack with 3750, it will only run StackWise.
See
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:28:46 +0100, you wrote:
Well... just because something is easy for Cisco doesn't mean they would
do it. They might believe that IOS XE on the ISRs would eat into the
market for ASR, so they don't do it.
The ISR G2s will Eventually(TM) get IOS-XE too.
-A
XE is what the rumors told me the Sup2T would be based upon, but
IOS versions like 12.2(50)SY very much sound like IOS-trains.
It is IOS.
Sup2T will have IOS-XE Sometime Later(TM).
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Yes, I have two routers separated by a firewall (which is incapable
of running BGP). The two routers exchange routes via eBGP multi-hop
without problem.
Depending on what exactly you're trying to achieve, you could consider
running the ASA transparent and let the two routers peer as they would
[ASA] configuration guide cites only vss, not vpc unfortunately.
From the ASA point of view, two C6K running VSS and two N7K running vPC both
look like a single LACP partner. For the ASA, there's no difference if it's
a VSS pair or a vPC pair.
-A
___
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:09:56 -0700, you wrote:
If it really is only two boxes, FabricPath provides *no* benefits,
For one thing you could provide up to 256 10G links between two
boxes, something you could not do with STP.
OK, 256 x 10G is cool and much more than you can do with link
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:51:07 +1100, you wrote:
If it really is only two boxes, FabricPath provides *no* benefits,
only more complexity
1. FabricPath adds no complexity compared to traditional L2 (STP).
But with two boxes, you wouldn't need STP... And while there may not
be much
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:14:21 -0500, you wrote:
The ACLs are BCP 38-oriented with eBGP; no rate-limiting. We're running
124-11.XW2.
You really should look at upgrading that to some more recent and less
End-of-X. 12.4 XW also has know vulnerabilities only fixed in later
releases.
Any ideas?
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:37:25 +, you wrote:
But I was answering the OP's question on using it for *two* boxes,
not judging it in general.
I think one consideration may be that you may not always have only
two boxes - so why not use FabricPath to begin with, so that
I would think it's doable with Flexible NetFlow in SRE.
Haven't tried, though.
-A
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mack McBride
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:54 PM
To: Matlock, Kenneth L; Jon Harald
IPv6 supported? No. Probably coming in october this year.
Last I heard was 'sometime 2012' for IPv6 support -- Totally
unacceptable for any device doing L3 in SP environments, IMO -- so I
consider it a L2-only box.
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
We are considering deploying a pair of Nexus 7010 switches using
fabricpath for L2 and HSRP for Layer 3.
If it really is only two boxes, FabricPath provides *no* benefits,
only more complexity... If you want to use FabricPath for anything
useful today, you have to use Nexus 7000 access switches
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 09:47:07 +0100, you wrote:
Sorry if this is a newbie question, but if one would have a Sup720 RP
being overloaded by multicast packets from a connected segment, what
should one do?
Look at MLS rate limiters, where you can control how much is punted.
-A
Look at MLS rate limiters, where you can control how much is
punted.
The keyword to look for is CoPP (Control Plane Policing).
If there are anything but insignificant amounts of multicast, one really
should (also) use the MLS rate limiters, which run in the PFC / DFCs and
catch cases that
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:20:18 -0700, you wrote:
speaking for NX-OS, you have all of awk/sed/grep/tr/wc/sort/uniq/diff
already available and we've been pretty responsive in adding new types
on request...
... and thank you *very much* for that. Highly appreciated!
-A
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:02:34 +0900, you wrote:
I heard C4900M is low latency switch
In almost all real-world scenarios, any dropped frame affects
performance almost infinitely more than the latency of any switch
between the two hosts. Don't *just* look at latency.
That being said: The Nexus
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:33:04 +0100, you wrote:
(Like, BFD for OSPFv3, which *is* in 12.2SR, but not in 12.2SX...)
Don't use a LAN platform. LANs don't need BFD :-P
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:01:31 -, you wrote:
If it is a new blade, what does this mean:
Migration from Cisco ACE10 or ACE20 to Cisco ACE30
Customers that have an existing Cisco ACE10 or ACE20 Module can migrate to a
Cisco ACE30 Module based on a Throughput license purchased with the
Is this just changing the daughter card? Or is it a completely new blade?
It's a new blade (new NPU's)
What's the list prices of these updates?
30 k$
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:41:04 +, you wrote:
We have also been using Cisco-coded transceivers for years, and haven't
had significantly worse failure rate on those than on optics purchased
from Cisco. YMMV.
Not surprising really,considering they're probably exactly the same
hardware (bar
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:05:09 +0100, you wrote:
Of course. That just means that Cisco is bound to alienate some subset
of their customers. And I can't imagine Cisco doesn't know that their
competitors _really_ use this to their advantage. I'm not sure e.g.
HP/H3C is better, but boy do they
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:37:24 -0600, you wrote:
I had a customer with HP VirtualConnect Flex-10 and Cisco Nexus 5000,
who couldn't use a Cisco cable (DAC) because the VC wouldn't accept it
and couldn't use a HP cable because the N5K wouldn't accept it. So ...
'service unsupported' to the
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:21:21 +0100, you wrote:
I have some (though not much) sympathy for Cisco's not wanting to
support 3rd party transceivers. Hey, they have to feed their kids and
all that. But I fail to see why they won't support their own
transceivers. That's just plain stupid.
Support
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:53:37 +0100, you wrote:
I have tried to look up if Cisco ASA 5520 (or any other cisco ASA
model) supports QinQ tagged vlans, but been unable to find out if it
supports this functionality.
It doesn't.
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:58:45 +0100, you wrote:
Maybe not totally relevant to the SP world, but does anybody know why
Cisco stopped serving the LAN only images for the Sup720/C6k?
They didn't.
s72033-ipservicesk9-mz.122-33.SXI5.bin (IP SERVICES SSH LAN ONLY)
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:37:32 +0200, you wrote:
The 2960 is a L2 switch. It can't do unicast routing either...
OT, but actually it can. Just only static unicast routing.
Release notes: When you configure the new lanbase-routing SDM
template, the switch supports static routing and router ACLs
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:42:22 +0200, you wrote:
End of new service attachment - November 2006. You could buy a
router in November 2002. Then, four years later you decided it was
a last call for extending the life of your network.
By either renewing yearly the service contract during the entire
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:50:31 -0400, you wrote:
I am configuring an ASR1006 with the following SPA cards installed.
SPA-10X1GE-V2
SPA-4XT3/E3
Have you read and tried Required Configuration Tasks:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:46:29 -0500, you wrote:
Any ideas why the Cisco End of Sale/End of Support page
(http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/prod_end_of_life.html) doesn't
show 3560 switches yet my Cisco Contract Center shows 31-Jul-2015
as EOS for WS-C3560-24PS-S, WS-C3560-48PS-S, etc? (not
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:13:35 +0100, you wrote:
It's also looks like Cisco may be vaguely moving in the direction of
locking CCO accounts down to be able to access only software downloads
for which there are active smartnet contracts.
Active service contracts, yes that's what they're doing.
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:32:05 +0100, you wrote:
The 1812 is set as a stub with no other routing protocols being used.
When I use the redistribute static or redistribute connected commands
it advises these cant be used as the router is an asbr. The router
is only running 1 ospf process for the
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:12:37 +0200, you wrote:
He should actually be ok even with ER and no attenuators as minimum
transmit power is -4.7 dBm and max receive power is -1 dBm (per cisco
site). Just check optical power levels and see if they are in limits.
Uhm, no.
*Maximum* transmit power is 4
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:02:46 +0200, you wrote:
*Maximum* transmit power is 4 dBm and max receive is -1 dBm, so an
attenuator is certainly highly recommended for short distances.
Yes, but it won't be transmitting max power for sure.
No... it might be transmitting with only 2, or even 0 dBm,
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:46:29 -0500, you wrote:
*Maximum* transmit power is 4 dBm and max receive is -1 dBm, so
an attenuator is certainly highly recommended for short distances.
Minimum cabling distance for -LR, -SR, -LX4, -ER modules is 2m,
according to the IEEE 802.3ae standard
And?
-A
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:50:21 +0200, you wrote:
If I were a competitor, my worst nightmare might be Cisco gets their
operating system act together, and delivers a stable, modular, cross-
platform OS *for all their existing product lines*.
CRS-3 and Cisco 500 routers, Nexus 7000 and SFE 1000P
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:17:18 +, you wrote:
The 4500 series switches are not comparable to the 4900 switches.
I find that comment a bit funny. The Catalyst 4900 switches *are* in
all practical sense Catalyst 4500 switches.
4928 = 4500/SupV
4948 = 4500/SupV
4948-10G =
It's really quite simple:
48x1G downlinks + 2x10G uplinks + 2x10G stacking = 88G non-blocking
88G x marketing = 176G
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:29:18 -0400, you wrote:
I have seen some pretty low level problems with multicast packets
being dropped on the floor by the hardware forwarded on 67xx
linecards. The bug seems to appear when changes that effect the asic
(turning on mls qos for example). Resetting the
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:40:17 +1200, you wrote:
I
could get a xconnect going between one of the bigger boxes and the
small PE, without actually wasting port on the bigger router (by
having some sort of logical interface) then I could run the BGP
session directly. I had a look on Cisco
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:53:48 +0200, you wrote:
It smells like a battery of some kind run dry, combined with the
NVRAM not being flash based. Anybody have a clue about what I
could do? Other than have it replaced? :-)
The solution *is* to have it RMA'ed. I just had a similar case on a
7600.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:12:50 +0200, you wrote:
If you want to stick with Cisco, do they have any similar products with
larger buffers? I.e 24 or 48 1000base-T and some SFP/SFP+ uplink ports?
Look at Catalyst 4948E: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10947/
-A
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:41:06 +0400 (MSD), you wrote:
You can do it if you have the PFC3CXL card (available as spare for
6500 Sups), it was never productized however.
I couldn't find it in GPL.
VS-F6K-PFC3CXL= is Catalyst 6500 Sup720-10G Policy Feature Card 3CXL
-A
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:45:13 +0400 (MSD), you wrote:
VS-F6K-PFC3CXL= is Catalyst 6500 Sup720-10G Policy Feature Card 3CXL
It's for SUP720.. We have RSP720-3C..
1) You wrote that there is no official upgrade for the RSP
2) ?ukasz wrote that you could upgrade with the PFC3CXL upgrade,
which
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:51:12 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
I have to convert to AFI for IPv6, will my IPv4 BGP session drop
when I do the conversion bgp upgrade-cli ?
No. (Yes, I've done that many times).
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:55:41 -0500, you wrote:
Just spotted a feature called OSPF for Routed Access in the 6500 SXI4
release notes, which seems to indicate that single-area OSPF support is
coming to IP Base IOS images.
OSPF for Routed Access is not limited to a single area. You can find
the
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:50:30 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
OSPF for Routed Access supports only one OSPFv2 and one OSPFv3
instance with a maximum number of 200 dynamically learned routes.
So, what would you do with that? Put each OSPF for Routed Access
switch in its own NSSA area uplinked to a
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:49:14 +, you wrote:
Instead of relying on the routers for IPSEC VPN encryption, I am considering
the use of dedicated hardware encryption appliances for that purpose.
Out of curiosity, why?
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:21:10 +0700, you wrote:
#2 : Or you can use SRR features on outgoing (downlink) port:
OP (and the Subject) talks about 3550, which doesn't do SRR...
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:46:29 +0400, you wrote:
I reviewed thread 7600 + egress netflow + 12.2(33)SRE. There was mentioned
Cisco 7600 hasn't hardware support of egress netflow. Please, could anybody
give me links or materials approving that fact. I made little lab:
Check out the NetFlow and NDE
On Wed, 26 May 2010 11:50:30 +0100, you wrote:
Obviously these are not listed on the Nexus 5k data sheet, but does
anyone know if they will work? Are they just re branded Cisco ones, or
are the Cisco ones re branded generic cables?
The supported ones (incl. 3rd party) are listed here:
Has anyone successfully run Nexus 5000s and Nexus 2000s with 3rd party
10Gbase-LRM SFP+?
(LRM SFP+ is not supported from Cisco (yet?)).
TIA,
-A
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
On Tue, 4 May 2010 10:23:00 -0400, you wrote:
I'm having difficulty finding any details on the size of the port buffers
and/or queue type on the RSP720-3C-10GE sup card for a 7606-s. Anyone know
the queue type (receive 8q4t, transmit 1p7q4, etc...) or port buffer size
(16mb, 200mb, etc..).
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:04:35 +0200, you wrote:
If one were to want xconnected SVIs and real VPLS on a 6500/Sup720,
what would one need? We need 10G, and using SIP-600 as core facing
interfaces seems to be the only solution, albeit rather expensive.
Check with your account team if the ES+ will
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:58:27 +0200, you wrote:
Also, on a 7600 (SR software), you can run Mux UNI (a trunk with VLANs
and sub-interfaces on the same interface), even on LAN cards. I don't
remember off the top of my head if that's supported on the 6500.
It is, but won't help. You still can't
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:19:11 +0200, you wrote:
I did actually mean xconnect configuration on a SVI. :-)
A 7600 chassis and ES+ cards will do that today.
It's probably less expensive than the SIP solution.
Plus, SR is IMO better software than SX. YMMV.
-A
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:47:26 +0200, you wrote:
i did some googling and find 2 solutions in this area , Packet Design
Route Explorer and HP RAMS
I have used Route Explorer and Traffic Explorer in the past and found
that they are very nice tools that work as advertised and provide lots
of
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:33:49 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time), you wrote:
What are the primary differences between the 3508G and the 3550-12G?
3508G-XL is a very old layer 2 switch, 3550-12G is one generation
newer (10 years?) and is a layer 3 switch. Both are end-of-sale,
3508G-XL is
You're doing or testing something wrong. (It's not possible to say
what with the limited information you provide). The ME-3400 will
happily do line rate.
-A
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:57:47 -0400, you wrote:
I have an ME3400 running 12.2(46)SE that will not pass (much) more
than 1000pps through
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 01:39:18 +0200, you wrote:
Are these X-models considerably more expensive than E-models?
Less.
Or are they targeted at replacing the E-models?
Yes, both E and G, as far as I'm told.
(The final prices are not in the GPL)
-A
___
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:20:14 +0100, you wrote:
WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR=Catalyst 6000 Blank Line Card Slot Cover
WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR-E= Catalyst 6500 Enhanced chassis line card slot cover
I have to ask. What's 'enhanced' about the second piece of metal?
The metal isn't enhanced. It's for the 6500-E
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:16:47 -0700, you wrote:
Does anyone know if blank slot covers for the 65/7600 switches can be
ordered, and if so what the part number is? I asked my sales team, but
no answer back, and I cannot find the part number on the Dynamic
Configuration Tool.
WS-X6K-SLOT-CVR=
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:48:00 -0600, you wrote:
And the linecard I want to put in it uses a DFC3A. From the docs it
seems that this arrangement will work, but A) I have to reboot the box,
and B) PFC will fall back to operating as a PFC3A.
That is correct.
Can you live without 3B features?
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:25:01 -, you wrote:
Can somebody explain me the logic behind this ?
If you're looking to buy a CRS, you really shouldn't have to bother
with that. You should have people crawling all over you ready to
explain everything and do all the work ;-)
But anyway...
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:49:38 -0700, you wrote:
So, at this point I think we've decided to resolve the issue by
backing out this patch, moving the cluster to its own separate vlan,
leave the cluster in unicast mode, and call it a day.
Just remember not to run it on VMware, then. (As I said,
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:21:49 -0500, you wrote:
I want something that can do line rate gig, multiple streams, with
reasonable buffers, multicast, MPLS in hardware, and netflow, with some
number of optical ports (sfp or gbic, whatever).
3560s seem out due to the buffering issues
3560 has no
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:01:55 +0100, you wrote:
C6k(config)# arp vrf X 10.0.0.1 03bf.0abc.def0 ARPA
If it is in fact a 6500, that alone is a pretty bad idea, as traffic
bound for the cluster will be process-switched. It is recommended to
add at static MAC entry as well.
mac-address-table
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:57:33 +0100, you wrote:
If it is in fact a 6500, that alone is a pretty bad idea, as traffic
bound for the cluster will be process-switched. It is recommended to
add at static MAC entry as well.
Hmm, I can't seem to reproduce this.
I know I've seen that once and I
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
