--- Begin Message ---
Hard to tell without any debug or configuration from the other side.
Causes could be missing tunnel authentication or l2tp hostname not matched by
any configured group.
I would expect other errors, but not able to test it at the moment.
What kind of LNS is the peer?
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
it would be good to share some more details.
What do you mean exactly with can reach the core?
Your whole core network? With or without other customers on other routers?
How does a traceroute look from the customer or sourced from the private
customer IPs to
--- Begin Message ---
Have you tried setting exceed-action drop instead of transmit for voice?
Am Montag, 15. Februar 2021, 14:42:34 schrieb BASSAGET Cédric:
> note that I have the same error message with :
>
> policy-map parent
> class class-default
> shape average 1
>
--- Begin Message ---
Am Donnerstag, 13. August 2020, 11:15:00 schrieb Nick Hilliard:
> Gert Doering wrote on 13/08/2020 08:40:
> > Peer-groups are an amazing invention.
>
> + if it's 100+ neighbours, then automation would be useful.
If you can't automate peer-group with bgp listen range could
Usually it is caused by a broken fiber, but you will never know for sure until
you checked it.
Gesendet von meinem BlackBerry
Originalnachricht
Von: Harry Hambi - Atos
Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2016 12:44
An: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Betreff: [c-nsp] TX low alarm warning
Hi all,
Am Montag, 16. November 2015, 19:26:45 schrieb Erik Klaassen:
> I have a fastnetmon/exabgp instance to inject routes into the border
> router(7600 / 720-3b-xl) to trigger remote blackholing. Triggering a
> blackhole null route is easy. But now i want to implement selective
> blackholing (my
L;'?
Gesendet von meinem BlackBerry
Originalnachricht
Von: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2015 02:26
An: Steve Margelos; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Betreff: Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 - H-QoS across 2+ EFP interfaces
Steve,
Please refer to the QOS section in the following
Have you tried to use logging buffered 128000 debugging?
I know there is level debugging, but maybe it change the behavior...
Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2015, 19:11:08 schrieb Michael Malitsky:
sh run all produces the same output: logging buffered 128000. I thought
debug was usually default... Sh
Hi,
Am Samstag, 9. Mai 2015, 22:39:16 schrieben Sie:
Hi,
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 10:29:41PM +0200, Karsten Thomann wrote:
Your config looks like a routed port and not a switched port, so you can
reuse every vlan on any routed port.
Not on 6500/sup720.
gert
Thanks for the information
First I'm not a 6500 expert.
Your config looks like a routed port and not a switched port, so you can reuse
every vlan on any routed port.
Gesendet von meinem BlackBerry
Originalnachricht
Von: Olivier CALVANO
Gesendet: Samstag, 9. Mai 2015 22:23
An: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Betreff:
Hi,
yes you're missing something obvious (soft reconfiguration)
With received-routes you see the routes before the route map is applied,
use only routes to see the routes accepted after the route map.
Am 10.03.2015 um 03:40 schrieb CiscoNSP List:
Hi Everyone,
Only had a few hours sleep, so
Hi,
if you want to deny the prefix you have to use deny ;)
The untested version of your route-map should do the expected, but you
don't need the continue 20 as the continue doesn't work with a deny.
Karsten
Am 03.02.2015 06:21, schrieb CiscoNSP List:
Hi Everyone,
If I want to block certain
Hi Chris
Is there any configured default route on the router?
Is it possible to post output of sh ip route?
This looks like a default route without next hop ip and proxy arp at the
provider...
Kind regards
Karsten
Gesendet von meinem BlackBerry
Originalnachricht
Von: chris
Gesendet:
://pastebin.com/AxMB3mw8[1]
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Karsten Thomann
karsten_thom...@linfre.de[2] wrote:
Hi Chris
Is there any configured default route on the router?Is it possible to post
output of sh ip
route?This looks like a default route without next hop ip and proxy arp at the
provider
As no one asked yet, is it possible to get ospf related debug from the
not working router and the DR router of the subnet?
Am 26.11.2014 14:44, schrieb Victor Sudakov:
Harold 'Buz' Dale wrote:
If you sh arp do you see the right MAC address for the ip.
Certainly. I can even ping it from any
15 matches
Mail list logo