Re: [c-nsp] Minimum hardware and version to run VSS

Hi, Plus, you need VS SUP720. Sidney 2017-05-30 14:49 GMT+02:00 Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr : > Dear Chuck, > > Thank you for confirming what I was already suspecting. > > Best regards. > > > > 2017-05-30 14:34 GMT+02:00 Chuck Church : > > > I'm pretty

Re: [c-nsp] Exactly how bad is the 6704-10GE?

Hi, 2014-10-09 2:16 GMT+02:00 Simon Lockhart si...@slimey.org: If we take, for example, a 6504 on our network. It has a Sup2T in slot 1, 6704-10GE(CFC) in slot 2, 6724-SFP(CFC) in slot 3, and 6904-40G(DFC4) in slot 4. I've got a 4*10G portchannel towards our core consisting of Te2/1,

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

Hi Gert, On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Now, I would have strongly liked to have the hardware-independent bits of IOS to be the same across all platforms, abstracting the hardware side well enough that features like 32 bit AS support arrive on all

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: So how is this working? 15.0M already has all the niceness, and the hardware BUs are not picking it up? From the feature lists and such, AFAIK, only Cat 6k, 4k, 3k, ISR series as well as ASR1k are concerned...

Re: [c-nsp] RSP720-3CXL - 512k ipv4 route capacity ?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Brandon Applegate bran...@burn.net wrote: I'm pretty sure either I'm not understanding something architecuture-wise or we've enabled something globally that halves this. The marketing sheet says this will do 1M ipv4 routes. Hi, It supports 1M ipv4 routes

[c-nsp] BFD static routes on 6500 SXI

Hi list, I am pretty much confused whether bfd for static routes is actualy supported on 6500 running SXI release. On 7600 it's been added starting with SRC (cf http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps6970/ps1838/prod_presentation0900aecd8072c43a.pdf ). SXI release notes

Re: [c-nsp] Determine SFP type through CLI

No difference. = means spare parts. Sidney On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Jeff Wojciechowski jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.com wrote: Sort of... NAME: GigabitEthernet2/0/3, DESCR: 10/100/1000BaseTX SFP PID: , VID: , SN: xx Doesn't show the exact

Re: [c-nsp] no implementation plans

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Open questions in my mind: am I really going to go back and do a VSS conversion on existing installations? That's a lot of time and energy, especially as it doesn't reduce exposure to IOS bugs (we haven't had any hardware

Re: [c-nsp] packet capture on 6509....??

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Gabby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to do packet capture or the like on a 6509 (or similar platform) that doesn't have a FW module. I know I could do span port, but I'm interested in knowing if there's any other method It looks like a new

Re: [c-nsp] VPN Failover

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Nimal David Sirimanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, Is it then possible, if SITEA -- vpn -- SITEB fails, that it will failover to SITEA -- vpn -- DRSITE? Hi, Have a look at DPD and RRI features. Cisco design guides:

Re: [c-nsp] cisco 828 WARNING: Cookie information is corrupt

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Emre Türkmenler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a Cisco 828 Router and I'm receiving a WARNING: Cookie information is corrupt message and the router can't boot,I can only reach the Rommon mode. How can I solve this problem? Thanks Hi, Below one

Re: [c-nsp] Microsoft NLB vs Cisco

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amazing, think I found a fix: http://www.skendric.com/packet/msnlb-catalyst-configuration.pdf MS NLB requires not just a static ARP entry, but a static MAC too, something like: arp a.b.c.d 0100.5e7f.ccdd

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7206VXR

On 4/25/08, Gert Doering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 7200s perfectly well support PA OIR. My mistake :) Must have confused with modular routers and NM. Sidney ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7206VXR

, If you run into the same problem again, try to upgrade ROMMON to 12.3 code. http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/72xxrommon http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/12S28FUR.html This could save you the hassle of a RMA. Sidney Boumendil

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7206VXR

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Jason Berenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sidney, I already got the G1 replaced, it's working. I have an NPE-400 in a VXR chassis that was running fine with 12.3.x until I put 12.4.19 on it. It starts the boot process, shows the version of bootstrap (12.2.x)