it as a Qwest megahost issue.
-Original Message-
From: Ted Mittelstaedt [mailto:t...@toybox.placo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 2:48 PM
To: Ruben Alvarez
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Ping priority on Cisco devices
Ruben Alvarez wrote:
All,
I've heard
Without having a more detailed explanation of what browsing
problems your having, it's difficult to give any more specific
advice, but here goes:
1) browsers cache DNS lookups, so if your having repetitive
lookups fail off the same browser session, it's not actually a
DNS problem even though it
Ruben Alvarez wrote:
All,
I've heard that Cisco devices handle ICMP at a low priority. I found one
post describing it handled in process-switching and not fast-switching.
Does anyone have an article that explains that process and is it
configurable?
The reason I ask is I see about 4% packet
Garry wrote:
Hi *
I've got something of a question that's not necessarily a clear
technical problem or config problem ... rather just scoping as to
whether other people have come across this, too ...
We have a customer who has some 400+ locations. All of these are
connected to the central
Aaron Riemer wrote:
Hey guys,
We have a requirement to monitor the external availability of a web
server that hangs off our ASA DMZ interface. I was thinking of running
an IP SLA probe from our external router to test the web requests but I
was wondering if anyone had done something with EEM
Hi All,
I have a 7206 router that has a PA-A3-3 card in it running IOS 12.2.46a
The router has the following config snippit in it:
interface ATM1/0.2 multipoint
description NEW Qwest DSL
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
pvc 55 1/56
vbr-nrt 896 896 120
!
pvc 56 1/98
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nicholas Linn
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 11:19 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] c3660: Utterly baffled by ROMs
Ted,
Oh I have an image and it runs fine, to a
Hi All,
I have an 8 port PA-8T serial card in a router. The card has an
octopus cable that is plugged into a rack of card DSU's. Most
of the DSU's have T1's into them.
One T1 has developed a problem where it runs for a few hours
and then the router serial interface it is on goes down.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Turnbow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:50 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OK, what is a cheap and dirty hack to test a port
If I simply assign something like IP
-Original Message-
From: Luan Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 7:22 AM
To: 'Ted Mittelstaedt'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OK, what is a cheap and dirty hack to test a port
Is it a Verizon circuit?
We have a T1 circuit
Here is an explanation of what your SUPPOSED to have:
http://www.cermetek.com/Support/APP-Notes/611-0175.pdf
with some schematics in case you want to roll your
own protectors.
According to this, per FCC part 68, your national telephone
company is in violation of FCC regs if it is not providing
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Howard Leadmon
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 1:12 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Possible List Troll/Spammer..
After posting to the list last week, sure enough I got a Cisco
So what happened to the CPU of the ASA when the PC and server
started sending 100Mbt of data to each other? Or was one of
them running 10BaseT, half-duplex?
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fawcett Simon
Sent: Thursday, July 17,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marc Archer
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:25 PM
To: Geyer, Nick
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NAT and hairpin's
Hi Nick,
We had the same problem at work and used DNS to
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 1:18 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
And running a production webserver on a 486-DX2 is also not a good
idea. I don't
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 10:49 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
-Original Message-
From: Tony Varriale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 7:50 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
It's fairly well known by people that have been fortunate to been around
:50 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
Holy crap. Did you say Windows?
tv
- Original Message -
From: Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ziv Leyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Joerg Mayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Aaron
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peder @
NetworkOblivion
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 5:28 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cisco-NSP Mailing List
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
What!? The original PIX code was
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of C. Jon Larsen
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:30 AM
To: Peder @ NetworkOblivion
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cisco-NSP Mailing List
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
Ted,
Peder is
Rubbish.
The reason the PIX doesen't allow Telnet is that the original
PIX devices were built on a Windows core, Windows 3.1 as I
believe, with the GUI and most of the command line utilities
stripped away. Because the PIX was an early out-of-the-hole
firewall, it captured a customer base of
the OP
on what he wants to do, I'll wait and see.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 2:36 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Church, Charles; Richey; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] access-list speed limiting.
On Sun
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rathlev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:35 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: cisco-nsp
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Fake Cisco Equipment News Articles - very
interesting
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 22:43 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [c-nsp] Fake Cisco Equipment News
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:57 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Fake Cisco Equipment News Articles - very
interesting
This thread probably covers an interesting subject, but in
please post the entire pix config
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rudy Setiawan
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 12:05 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] PIX questions
Hi all,
I have a question about PIX
So, we can run Linux on the Cisco routers,
And we can run IOS on a Linux system
(http://dynagen.org/)
And, for an encore, we can proceed to prove
that white is black and get ourselves killed
at the next Zebra crossing.
There's some things that are just too stupid
to contemplate doing.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy McDermond
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:42 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS pirating requests
On Apr 8, 2008, at 4:58 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
You really
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Varriale
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 7:48 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS pirating requests
I would disagree with what's mostly here. But, I'm guessing both of us
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matthew Crocker
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 11:19 AM
To: Tony Varriale
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS pirating requests
SOP is buy the chassis and routing engine new
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Asbjorn Hojmark -
Lists
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 1:23 PM
To: 'Daniel Hooper'; 'Jon Lewis'
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS pirating requests
But if you send me the
And yes this is such an important feature since the devices
are so crappy they keep crashing.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gregori Parker
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 2:36 PM
To: Murphy, William ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brandon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Doug McIntyre
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:38 PM
To: Justin Shore
Cc: 'cisco-nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.
I believe the main reason for this (besides the fact that the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mohacsi Janos
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:11 PM
To: Carlos Friacas
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Church, Charles
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT : IPv6 - Will it hit like an avalanch?
On Tue, 1 Apr
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 10:41 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Mohacsi Janos; Carlos Friacas; Church, Charles;
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT : IPv6 - Will it hit like an avalanch?
Hi,
On Tue
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ziv Leyes
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:09 AM
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT : IPv6 - Will it hit like an avalanch?
When did exactly the IPv4 started?
Read up on the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ziv Leyes
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:29 AM
To: Whisper
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT : IPv6 - Will it hit like an avalanch?
I want to set an appointment with you in,
-Original Message-
From: Dale W. Carder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:56 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Gert Doering; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT : IPv6 - Will it hit like an avalanch?
And with IPv6, because the globally
Naw, it's only so they can get the latest security updates. ;-)
(oops, I forgot, Cisco gives them out for free)
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Whisper
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 5:22 AM
To: Jon Lewis
Cc:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 6:14 AM
To: Ziv Leyes
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT : IPv6 - Will it hit like an avalanch?
IPv6 won't work! (and its variants)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mohammad khalil
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:23 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] PIX
Hi all
We have PIX 515 installed in our data center, the version installed is
6.3
The Belkins work fine with MacOS X if you use the open source driver
from sourceforge.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ramcharan, Vijay
A
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 7:05 AM
To: Cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] USB to serial
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim Franklin
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 3:11 AM
To: Daniel Hooper
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] USB to serial converter
On Mon, February 4, 2008 7:59 am, Daniel Hooper
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard A
Steenbergen
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 11:51 AM
To: Steve Feldman
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] counterfeit?
Many optic vendors will even give you a choice
of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Voth
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 7:18 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Coax question for DS3
Hey guys,
I've never had to pull our own DS3 coax cable before and I'm now
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hank Nussbacher
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 9:57 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cheapening the value of a CCIE
Does Cisco do anything to stop these kind of antics:
-Original Message-
From: Sridhar Ayengar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 10:47 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Hank Nussbacher; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cheapening the value of a CCIE
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Does Cisco do anything
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Felix Nkansah
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 11:13 AM
To: groupstudy; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] OT: How do you fight spam in your enterprise? I need
help
Hello,
I know this
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pablo Almido
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:15 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: How do you fight spam in your enterprise? I
needhelp
You could buy appliances from
-Original Message-
From: Andy Dills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:37 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Pablo Almido; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: How do you fight spam in your enterprise? I
needhelp
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Storey
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 4:02 PM
To: Daniel Hooper
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: How do you fight spam in your enterprise? Ineed
help
On 21/12/2007,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 3:05 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MTBF for Cisco products
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev man, 03 dec 2007:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Will Hargrave
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:55 AM
Cc: Cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MTBF for Cisco products
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
(nor, in fact, for the additional money that they have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Justin Shore
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 5:11 PM
To: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco download problems
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Garry
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:45 AM
To: 'Cisco-nsp'
Subject: [c-nsp] BackupInterface IPv6 - when will they work together?
Just wondering - is there any time schedule (or an IOS release
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:46 PM
Cc: Cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MTBF for Cisco products
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
For a $20K device you better damn well understand
installation. Kind of like
getting a service contract on a UPS. In our case we just bought
an extra one for sparing.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk - iNAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 8:43 AM
To: 'OCOSA ListAcct'; Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: cisco-nsp
Hi,
Telco Systems sells boxes that will break out a channelized DS3 into
T1s. You can get them off Ebay for about $500-$800. That is how we
handle our channelized DS3s. We break them out with the Telco systems
boxes then run the T1's through a DSU bank then into PA-8T serial cards
with
I don't think windows clients pay attention to the mtu size
option from dhcp.
ethernet is 1500 bytes so unless your running token ring, your
workstations won't generate larger then 1500 byte packets anyway.
There are a lot of things you can do that in theory will work
but in practice do not.
Your going to be better off sticking with your ipfilter solution -
you do know you don't have to field it on a Sun, correct?
The power available in off-the-shelf PC hardware is an order of
magnitude greater than available in all but the most expensive
Cisco routers. Most Cisco routers running
I think I did get a early 12.3 IP-Only to boot on a NPE200 just for
grins. I use 12.1 for production NPE200's. I would recommend you
try doing a boot from tftp that way you will see if it boots.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
-Original Message-
From: Robert Blayzor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 3:03 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Version of Cisco IOS not supported on NPE300
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I don't see how that could
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Antonio Querubin
Regardless of the cable type, the BNC on the ends need to match the cable
and secured well as that's really where you're likely to have the most
issues. I've run into DS3 cables made
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Blayzor
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 1:36 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Version of Cisco IOS not supported on NPE300
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
And don't plan on updating
Yes, there are. I forget the appropriate standard but your supposed
to use individually shielded pairs. HOWEVER, this doesen't become
a problem unless your going a really long distance such as 500-1000
feet. The teleco themselves run T1's on 100 pairs that are used as
IDFs inside of high rises
post output of show tech would be a start...remove passwords of course.
My magic wand that I use to conjure up explanations
without any info broke last week.
Or contact Cisco on your support contract.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
There is no business out there to want.
Go to whoever sold you the Cisco hardware.
The margins on smartnet contracts are virtually zero,
and the amount of work that Cisco requires the reseller to
do to register them now, costs much more than the margin.
Also once you get a contract, you can
67 matches
Mail list logo
