On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Alan Buxey wrote:
== Blades didn't move for months if not years for some ! Plus, diags passed
fully without any kind of problem !
we had an issue earlier this year when the temperature of a data
centre went up by 3 degrees and cooled repidly. yep. reseating the
Hi Arne,
Please send IS-IS configurations, what adjacencies are up, and what your link
state databases look like.
Thanks,
Tony
On Jun 24, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland wrote:
Hi all.
Can someone tell me what might be wrong. I have a router connected with 2
| ... It was founded by ex-DEC folks
|
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Len_Bosack
|
|I must admit, I didn't know that. But leaving in 1979 doesn't take him
|very far into VMS days.
In fact, Len is a dyed-in-the wool 36-bit head. Like most of the early
Cisco team, he was a big Tops-20
On Feb 14, 2008, at 5:27 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
This may sound like an odd question, but I was just curious if
there is any way to adjust the administrative distance for
'connected'?
I'm trying to make it impossible for hosts whom are 'blackholed' to
even send traffic to their
1. A laptop with a built-in serial port or a USB-Serial converter that
you know works (in fact, even if your laptop has a built-in serial
port it could be useful to have a USB-Serial converter handy in case
you need to connect to multiple devices at once). Also need to make
sure that your
there is something I can't quite figure out with BGP.
Let a bi-homed AS with only two BGP speakers (each of them has one
eBGP
session with a different upstream, they speak iBGP together).
Router 1 receives 238k routes from provider A; so does router 2 from
provider B.
When looking at
I've got a 2811 that crashed with a bus error within a few hours of
enabling Netflow export. I haven't opened a TAC case yet, but my
curiousity was aroused by the address at which the error occured
0xDEADBEF3. This could almost be pronounced Dead Beef
Yes - traditionally it's
On Jan 24, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Deepak Jain wrote:
In your opinion, is there any downside to this behavior
operationally (other than the time it takes for a unadvertised
route to present itself in the event the advertised route is
withdrawn?)?
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the
On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Kim Onnel wrote:
IMHO, it is very difficult to design a router that will capture
traffic
being hardware switched, am i correct?
This is correct. What do you do with the data? Without dedicated
high bandwidth storage, there's no place for it to go.
Yes, I've heard of them. They don't seem to add much value.
Tony
On Jan 1, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Anyone on-list heard of pingsta.com? Within the last hour I've
received
ten invitations to join them as an internetwork expert.
My immediate reaction is to never do
On Jul 12, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
You can do this with the configs suggested - if you sync to an
external time source your clocks will be accurate and if you dont
they will be wrong.
Agreed. The time resulting from such a configuration is generally
less accurate than
I tend to use tick and tock (.usno.navy.mil) for my stratum-2 servers.
There are others which allow public access, but why not just go to the
horse's mouth?
The horse can pretty far away.
If you're topologically distant, then access to tick and tock might
have substantial amounts of
On May 15, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Brian McMahon wrote:
My personal theory (SWAG) is that, long ago in the Elder Days of
single-digit IOS version numbers, some clever programmer figured out
a way to save a couple of processor cycles per ACL by coding the
bitmask this way around -- an efficiency
13 matches
Mail list logo
