Re: [c-nsp] 15.0(SE) 3560 was ME3600X Netflow and WCCP?

2011-07-28 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 13:56 +1000, Reuben Farrelly wrote: Doesn't seem like much difference between 12.2(58)SE and 15.0(1)SE in terms of either features or bug fixes, so if you've taken the (brave) plunge and are already running 12.2(58)SE it looks like a fairly minor upgrade. Is something

Re: [c-nsp] 15.0(SE) 3560 was ME3600X Netflow and WCCP?

2011-07-28 Thread Reuben Farrelly
I've had some quite odd problems with IPv6 with 12.2(58)SE1. Upon loading the image, all IPv4 worked OK, but my IPv6 addresses on loopbacks were there, but non functional. Routes for them were propagated throughout OSPFv3 but I wasn't able to ping them from anything other than the local

Re: [c-nsp] 15.0(SE) 3560 was ME3600X Netflow and WCCP?

2011-07-28 Thread Michele Bergonzoni
Il 28/07/2011 9.35, Reuben Farrelly ha scritto: I've had some quite odd problems with IPv6 with 12.2(58)SE1 ... and two exhibited this problem whereas two others didn't Maybe trivial, but: did you check the SDM templates? Regards, Bergonz -- Ing. Michele Bergonzoni -

Re: [c-nsp] 15.0(SE) 3560 was ME3600X Netflow and WCCP?

2011-07-28 Thread Reuben Farrelly
Yes. Besides, IPv6 routing works fine and is done in hardware on the same config with 12.2(55)SE3 with no other changes (desktop IPv4 and IPv6 routing template on both). Reuben On 28/07/2011 7:10 PM, Michele Bergonzoni wrote: Il 28/07/2011 9.35, Reuben Farrelly ha scritto: I've had some

Re: [c-nsp] 15.0(SE) 3560 was ME3600X Netflow and WCCP?

2011-07-27 Thread Daniel Hooper
Hi, Can anyone find any release note info in regards to 15.0(SE) on 3560's? Regards, Daniel -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Reuben Farrelly Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2011 8:12 AM To: Waris Sagheer (waris)

Re: [c-nsp] 15.0(SE) 3560 was ME3600X Netflow and WCCP?

2011-07-27 Thread Reuben Farrelly
Yes: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11781/prod_release_notes_list.html Doesn't seem like much difference between 12.2(58)SE and 15.0(1)SE in terms of either features or bug fixes, so if you've taken the (brave) plunge and are already running 12.2(58)SE it looks like a fairly minor