Thanks so much, Charles, for sharing this info.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:sp...@bway.net]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 7:02 PM
To: Adam Greene
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200VXR to ASR upgrade
On Feb 24, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Adam Greene
, and
can't get away with UNIVERSAL alone?
Thanks,
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:sp...@bway.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:43 PM
To: Aled Morris
Cc: Adam Greene; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200VXR to ASR upgrade
On Feb 19, 2014, at 11
: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200VXR to ASR upgrade
Hi guys,
I really appreciate everyone's input, including the clarification that there
is no ASR platform per se, only ASR1k, ASR9k, etc.
Assuming the customer goes with the ASR1002-X, which still seems to me
...@bway.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:43 PM
To: Aled Morris
Cc: Adam Greene; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200VXR to ASR upgrade
On Feb 19, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Aled Morris wrote:
On 19 February 2014 16:20, Adam Greene maill...@webjogger.net wrote:
Assuming
'Morning,
Am 19.02.2014 um 18:04 schrieb Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:32:52PM +, Aled Morris wrote:
They would but I believe basic BGP and OSPF are in IP BASE so it isn't
needed in this case, unless you need some specific features like BFD or
OSPFv3 for
Hi, all,
Am 19.02.2014 um 17:09 schrieb Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu:
If I'm looking for Nx 1Gbps ports for a reasonable cost (and
that can be supported by a meaty 10Gbps uplink)
Secondary market Catalyst 6504-E with at least SUP720-3BXL?
in a small-sized form factor
OK … :-)
Kind
On Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:37:43 AM Patrick M. Hausen
wrote:
Secondary market Catalyst 6504-E with at least
SUP720-3BXL?
No thanks :-).
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On 20/02/2014 08:37, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
Secondary market Catalyst 6504-E with at least SUP720-3BXL?
great for shifting traffic, but terrible for handling bgp. Also not great
for customer edge stuff.
Nick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Adam Greene wrote:
move to the ASR platform. They may keep the 7204VXR/NPE-G1 for redundancy
Just to save you confusion in the future. There is no the ASR platform.
There are multiple. You'll incur less confusion if you actually say ASR1k
which has absolutely nothing in
If you only need Ethernet look at the ASR1001 - it is fairly cheap and
should do what you are after.
Andrew
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Adam Greene maill...@webjogger.net wrote:
Hi,
We have a customer running an old 7204VXR/NPE-G1, with (4) gigabit
interfaces, and BGP with two
On 19 February 2014 03:21, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 01:28:59 AM Jeremy Bresley
wrote:
The only caveats I'll mention on the ASR1K is that they
are priced around 1GbE ports. There are
OC3/OC12/OC48/DS3 cards available, but they tend to get
On 18/02/2014 22:40, Adam Greene wrote:
From what I'm seeing, the ASR1002-X looks to be the simplest and most
versatile / scalable option for them right out of the gate. Based on their
need for BGP/OSPF, I would say they need an Advanced IP Services license.
Does that sound right?
What you'll
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:12:50 PM Aled Morris
wrote:
I don't disagree with this, but I'd like to emphasise
Jeremy's subsequent remarks regarding the fact the ASR1k
is really a great Nx1GE platform, but not one you'd
deploy if you needed multiple 10GE interfaces.
To be honest, I'm
-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200VXR to ASR upgrade
On 18/02/2014 22:40, Adam Greene wrote:
From what I'm seeing, the ASR1002-X looks to be the simplest and most
versatile / scalable option for them right out of the gate. Based on
their need for BGP/OSPF, I would say they need
On 19 February 2014 16:20, Adam Greene maill...@webjogger.net wrote:
Assuming the customer goes with the ASR1002-X, which still seems to me to
be
the best forward-looking option for this particular customer's needs, in
order to get an Advanced IP Services license (which I assume is the
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:32:52PM +, Aled Morris wrote:
They would but I believe basic BGP and OSPF are in IP BASE so it isn't
needed in this case, unless you need some specific features like BFD or
OSPFv3 for IPv6.
*sigh*. There goes the promise if an image has feature X for IPv4,
On Feb 19, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Aled Morris wrote:
On 19 February 2014 16:20, Adam Greene maill...@webjogger.net wrote:
Assuming the customer goes with the ASR1002-X, which still seems to me to
be
the best forward-looking option for this particular customer's needs, in
order to get an
Hi,
We have a customer running an old 7204VXR/NPE-G1, with (4) gigabit
interfaces, and BGP with two upstream carriers. They are upgrading from 100M
carrier links to 1G, and may be looking at getting full routes from both
carriers soon, as well as implementing OSPF on the inside.
Rather
On 2/18/2014 4:40 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
We have a customer running an old 7204VXR/NPE-G1, with (4) gigabit
interfaces, and BGP with two upstream carriers. They are upgrading from 100M
carrier links to 1G, and may be looking at getting full routes from both
carriers soon, as well as implementing
Hi,
We have a customer running an old 7204VXR/NPE-G1, with (4) gigabit
interfaces, and BGP with two upstream carriers. They are upgrading from 100M
carrier links to 1G, and may be looking at getting full routes from both
carriers soon, as well as implementing OSPF on the inside.
Rather
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 01:28:59 AM Jeremy Bresley
wrote:
The only caveats I'll mention on the ASR1K is that they
are priced around 1GbE ports. There are
OC3/OC12/OC48/DS3 cards available, but they tend to get
pricey quickly if you're doing very many ports.
I suppose that can be
21 matches
Mail list logo
