Only drawback on the ASR1k platform is the lack of PPPoA support, otherwise we
would
have happely migrated away from our 7200/1G's
We got 2 ASR1004's for ethernet aggregation and they're doing just fine for
that :)
If you *insist* on having route-processor redundancy (what about interface
We use a 7507 for about 800 DSL customers.
We've found it works more reliably and uses quite a bit less electricity
using DC power. We'd had some random crashes on AC power from little
power issues that weren't enough to activate UPSs. Then I got some DC
power supplies on Ebay for less than
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of E. Versaevel
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 3:02 AM
To: Gert Doering
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7500 for DSL aggregation - RSP memory error?
Only drawback on the ASR1k platform is the lack of PPPoA support, otherwise
we would
have happely migrated away from
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 10:34:23 am jp wrote:
We use cold spares for parts. I've played with the redundant RSPs, but
its not a very clean cutover, and it takes a couple minutes before
everyting is happy. I've seen issues too where something breaks, but
things don't switch over.
I've got a
I've got a 7507 with dual RSP8's attempting to use rsp-jsv-mz.124-8.bin
configured for rpr-plus, but keep getting this around every 10 minutes
or so. It results in a loss of connectivity for end-users of course,
until the system recovers.
My initial guess is something is wrong with the
Keen
Sent: martedì 4 agosto 2009 11.51
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 7500 for DSL aggregation - RSP memory error?
I've got a 7507 with dual RSP8's attempting to use rsp-jsv-mz.124-8.bin
configured for rpr-plus, but keep getting this around every 10 minutes
or so. It results
I've never been brave enough to try a 7500 for dsl aggregation:)
And while a memory parity error is probably hardware,
I have this vague recollection that someone from
Cisco (Rodney Dunn?) has on a couple of occasions
recommended against using a 7500 for broadband
aggregation, since the platform
Probably me. ;)
There were some issues around DSL termination in to a VRF that would not
work.
The platform was never targeted for that market space so I wouldn't use it.
72xx, 10k, or ASR would be the pick.
The ISR's on really really low end side.
Rodney
Buhrmaster, Gary wrote:
I've
Yes, I believe it was you. We are trying to migrate from a 7200 to a
7500 to gain route processor redundancy. Our traffic is typically
20mbit peak from this site between 2 atm ds3's. Using radius, pppoa,
and some dsl subs are behind NAT, but we're slowly weeding them out into
having a
I view the rpr feature as completely useless in the real world.
Cold spare are way more effective.
The last time I had a rp failure, it was fixed by yanking one and
leaving the other.
In other words, odds are it causes more issues than it resolves.
Just added complexity for a box where its
10 matches
Mail list logo
