Re: [c-nsp] 802.3ad questions..

2010-03-03 Thread Per Carlson
Hi. We have (2) Metro Ethernet connections from two different carriers connecting our two locations at the moment.  We need to provide for redundancy at the L2 level for these, and would like to combine the bandwidth into one logical bundle. We will be using Cisco switches on both sides of

Re: [c-nsp] 802.3ad questions..

2010-03-03 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:52:42 +0100, you wrote: EtherChannel can be used if, and only if, both carriers tunnels the EtherChannel protocol. Such tunneling is only supported on VPWS (aka Q-in-Q) type of circuits. Well, actually one *could* run static EtherChannel (A.K.A. 'mode on') without

Re: [c-nsp] 802.3ad questions..

2010-03-02 Thread Yuri Bank
It should work, but with EtherChannel you can only load balance based on src,dst mac/ip/port ( depending on your hardware ). The only problem I forsee is that the port-channel will not know when your 600Mbit shaped link is at capacity, and will continue to try and send frames over it when your

[c-nsp] 802.3ad questions..

2010-03-01 Thread TCIS List Acct
Hi all, We have (2) Metro Ethernet connections from two different carriers connecting our two locations at the moment. We need to provide for redundancy at the L2 level for these, and would like to combine the bandwidth into one logical bundle. I'm fairly well versed at the L3 level, but