On Apr 23, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:07 AM, Charles Sprickman sp...@bway.net wrote:
On Apr 23, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Mike Hale wrote:
We've seen really weird behavior with third party SFPs in the past.
NHR has been surprisingly solid for us across all out
On Apr 22, 2014, at 21:39, Mike Hale eyeronic.des...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually...check this out.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11445646/advice-needed-cisco-asr-1002-routers-sfps
The GLC-T don't appear to be supported on first glance. The GE-T are.
Since your vendor calls
On (2014-04-22 21:50 -0400), Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hi,
We have an ASR-1002-X that's been living at home until it goes off to the
colo on Friday. I've been trying to learn all the quirks of the platform and
get some of the platform-specific stuff done before bringing in the bulk of
the
Hi Charles,
I've been banging my head against this all day.
We have an ASR-1002-X that's been living at home until it goes off to the
colo on Friday. I've been trying to learn all the quirks of the platform and
get some of the platform-specific stuff done before bringing in the bulk of
On Apr 23, 2014, at 1:07 AM, Charles Sprickman sp...@bway.net wrote:
On Apr 23, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Mike Hale wrote:
We've seen really weird behavior with third party SFPs in the past.
NHR has been surprisingly solid for us across all out platforms so far
*knock on wood*.
We've got some
On Apr 23, 2014, at 4:44 AM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
I'm unable to help you, but my observation is that cuSFP's have relatively
poor hit/miss ratio compared to optical SFPs. It takes practice and skill to
source bad optical SFP, hard to do by accident. But sourcing cuSFP which won't
Hello,
I've been banging my head against this all day.
We have an ASR-1002-X that's been living at home until it goes off to the colo
on Friday. I've been trying to learn all the quirks of the platform and get
some of the platform-specific stuff done before bringing in the bulk of the
config
Ive got some ASR1006's with SPA-5X1GE with NHR Gb copper SFP's that work
finedont have any 1002-X's to test sorry.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
We've seen really weird behavior with third party SFPs in the past.
NHR has been surprisingly solid for us across all out platforms so far
*knock on wood*.
We've got some Finisar-branded SFPs in our ASR which work nicely (but
that's expected since Finisar is the OEM, IIRC, for Cisco's SFPs).
On Apr 23, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Mike Hale wrote:
We've seen really weird behavior with third party SFPs in the past.
NHR has been surprisingly solid for us across all out platforms so far
*knock on wood*.
We've got some Finisar-branded SFPs in our ASR which work nicely (but
that's expected
-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Charles
Sprickman
Sent: den 23 april 2014 07:08
To: Mike Hale
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR-1K and 3rd party sfps
On Apr 23, 2014, at 12:39 AM, Mike Hale wrote:
We've seen really weird behavior with third party
11 matches
Mail list logo
