@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948)
On 15 Apr 2015, at 9:08 am, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Nexus 3000's ? (Option to do VPC with multiple 3000's in one rack back
to core/agg switches?)
Just installed two 3048’s to replace a Cat65k/Sup2. Configured vPC
On 15/04/2015 01:58, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Yes, entirely, as of about two years ago. Very happy with them.
Hi Bill,
What L3 features do you use on them? Last time I looked, I got the
impression that L3 on the smaller Nexus devices (i.e. non-7K) was a bit
patchy...
Thanks,
Howie
...@soprasteria.com
To: wo...@pch.net; cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:29:29 +
Hello.
Yes we are using Nexus 3048 for TOR when 10 Ge isn't necessary so that is the
direct replacement for our 4948E TOR switches
On 15 Apr 2015, at 9:08 am, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Nexus 3000's ? (Option to do VPC with multiple 3000's in one rack back to
core/agg switches?)
Just installed two 3048’s to replace a Cat65k/Sup2. Configured vPC with LACP
towards switches, ESX, Filers and Windows
: CiscoNSP List [mailto:cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com]
Sent: den 15 april 2015 10:44
To: Gustav UHLANDER; Bill Woodcock
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948)
Thanks Gustav - Notice there is a difference in buffer size (4948 v Nexus), but
store and forward vs cut
EOLed soon.
//Gustav.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill
Woodcock
Sent: den 15 april 2015 02:59
To: CiscoNSP List
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948)
On Apr 14, 2015, at 5:24 PM
Cheers - Are you using VPC?
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948)
From: wo...@pch.net
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:58:33 -0700
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
On Apr 14, 2015, at 5:24 PM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Bill
On Apr 14, 2015, at 5:24 PM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Thanks Bill - So you've been happy with the Nexus? Have you moved from the
Cat range to Nexus?
Yes, entirely, as of about two years ago. Very happy with them.
-Bill
Thanks Bill - So you've been happy with the Nexus? Have you moved from the Cat
range to Nexus?
Cheers.
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Alternate to TOR (4948)
From: wo...@pch.net
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:23:51 -0700
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
On Apr 14, 2015
Hi Everyone,
Been using the old 4948's for TOR, and have been happy with them, but as they
are EOL'd, looking at an alternate4948E are getting up there in price.
Nexus 3000's ? (Option to do VPC with multiple 3000's in one rack back to
core/agg switches?)
Any other suggestions are greatly
On Apr 14, 2015, at 4:08 PM, CiscoNSP List cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Been using the old 4948's for TOR, and have been happy with them, but as
they are EOL'd, looking at an alternate4948E are getting up there in
price.
Nexus 3000's ? (Option to do VPC with
11 matches
Mail list logo
