ssage-
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Jason Lixfeld
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 10:08 PM
> To:
> Subject: [c-nsp] MVPN vs. plain-old-multicast
>
> Hi all,
>
> We’ve got an A9K MPLS core that we do all sorts of
On Monday, November 24, 2014 11:08:04 PM Jason Lixfeld
wrote:
> In order to do MVPN, we’d have to enable PIM between the
> ME3600s and the A9Ks anyway, so since this is all in a
> common VRF, is there really any benefit to doing MVPN?
You never know when your Multicast services will extend to
c
If you don't need segmentation I don't see the benefit of moving to mVPN.
Only consider if you think there will be segmentation needs in the future.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We’ve got an A9K MPLS core that we do all sorts of fun stuff on, including
> LS
Hi all,
We’ve got an A9K MPLS core that we do all sorts of fun stuff on, including LSM.
Yay for a PIM-free core!
We’ve also got a whack of ME3600 PEs in ring that hang off of the A9Ks. Also
fully MPLS enabled; all L3 ME3600 and A9K core. While looking to bring
multicast out to these ME3600
