2x CPUs. One for control plane, one for data plane. The CPUs have different
architecture so you can't cross the streams. Since IOS-XE does packet
processing so much differently than classic IOS multiple cores are actually
useful now for moving packets. This is what the 4451 does.
On Fri, Jun 28,
but does that new 4400 have hardware-based forwarding like the ASR1K or
software-based/generic-CPU forwarding like the ISR G2 ? if it is the
latter, like for the G2 I would expect the actual performance to vary
greatly depending on features used, packet size, etc. So I am hoping it's
the former...
hmmm
The Cisco 4451-X data plane uses an emulated Quantum Flow Processor (QFP)
that delivers application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC)-like
performance that does not degrade as services are added.
--koug
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, Antoine Monnier wrote:
but does that new 4400 have
On (2013-06-28 13:24 +0300), John Kougoulos wrote:
The Cisco 4451-X data plane uses an emulated Quantum Flow Processor
(QFP) that delivers application-specific integrated circuit
(ASIC)-like performance that does not degrade as services are
added.
I was surprised by this. I would have
per earlier emails -- this provides emulated qfp-like behaviour. i believe they
use commodity silicon to provide this emulation, but exact make/manufacture
escapes me.
while this is based on bu slicks -- the 4451 loses nothing with services
enablement (nat, h-qos, etc). i believe that all
On (2013-06-26 23:30 +), Dobbins, Roland wrote:
But can cisco afford to have three quite similar product lines,
that are expensive to maintain?
Cisco isn't really a unitary company, it's a loose confederation of
semi-feudal fifedoms, each with its own PL. Effectively, they're
For those interested in the technical details, the slides for BRKARC-3486 are
up at:
http://t.co/ZncyGrhHX9
Slide 24 seems to indicate that the current Sup2T can support 440G/slot using
higher clock frequencies for the fabric connections and 4 instead of 2 fabric
connections per linecard.
I
On 2013-06-27 08:44, Chris Welti wrote:
For those interested in the technical details, the slides for
BRKARC-3486 are up at:
http://t.co/ZncyGrhHX9
Slide 24 seems to indicate that the current Sup2T can support
440G/slot using higher clock frequencies for the fabric connections
and 4 instead of
Am 6/27/13 12:36 PM, schrieb Tom Hill:
I've been told that 880G will need a new Supervisor.
440G will be like RSP440 in the ASR9K: you will need dual SUP2T to
take advantage of it. With a single Supervisor the other changes,
you'll have 220G per slot.
(My understanding -- correct me if
Thus spake Jeff Kell (jeff-k...@utc.edu) on Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:19:31PM
-0400:
On 6/26/2013 11:10 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
It just seems like the new 6k is positioned to poach prospective
customers from the (arguably) higher-margin Nexus 7k product line.
Now that you mention the
On 27/06/13 13:38, Dale W. Carder wrote:
Thus spake Jeff Kell (jeff-k...@utc.edu) on Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:19:31PM
-0400:
On 6/26/2013 11:10 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
It just seems like the new 6k is positioned to poach prospective
customers from the (arguably) higher-margin Nexus 7k
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:01:38PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
Baffled that they removed the CMP on later SUPs though; seemed like a
seriously good feature, and it's very hard to believe customers didn't
want it
Happy customers do not put things into requirement documents that they
On Jun 27, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Tom Hill wrote:
I'm quite annoyed that there aren't any newer line cards announced that take
advantage of faster SerDes rates (as your existing X6800/X6900
series line cards will not run any faster) but then I seem to recall 6500-E
came a short while before
As for the 4xxx I had this conversation before cisco live It fits
between the isrg2 and the asr Do to bandwidth requirements and added
features it fits well in the 500mb to gig with services..
Ymmv
Scott
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Jun 27, 2013, at 10:10
Per the cisco live session I was in... I believe it's layer three was
160gbps I'm not pushing anything close so it works well for us. 6k's
could be an option but the push factor is that they don't have the FC. Or
unified ports.
For us the 5548ups work great.
Ymmv
Scott
On Wednesday,
actual performance on the 4451 (this is the only isr4400 model) -- will be up
to 2gbps with the license upgrade.
according to the bu -- this is with services enabled.
q.
-= sent via iphone. please excuse spelling, grammar, and brevity =-
On Jun 27, 2013, at 9:16, Scott Voll
On 09/06/13 20:58, Rinse Kloek wrote:
Hi,
Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k chassis ?
The new Catalyst 6807-XL chassis will be able to scale up to 220-880Gbps
per slot with feature linecards/sup. The chassis will be compatible with
the current SUP2T supervisor.
These are on
Announced at cisco live yesterday I believe
Scott
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 09/06/13 20:58, Rinse Kloek wrote:
Hi,
Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k chassis ?
The new Catalyst 6807-XL chassis will be able to scale up to 220-880Gbps
per slot
New Nexus 7710 and 7718 chassis and F3 line modules announced too..
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.ukwrote:
On 09/06/13 20:58, Rinse Kloek wrote:
Hi,
Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k chassis ?
The new Catalyst 6807-XL chassis will be
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k chassis ?
The new Catalyst 6807-XL chassis will be able to scale up to 220-880Gbps
per slot with feature linecards/sup. The chassis will be compatible with
the current SUP2T
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:56:00PM -0700, Scott Voll wrote:
Nothing at cisco live shows the nexus, asr, or cats going away anytime soon.
Sure. But can cisco afford to have three quite similar product lines,
that are expensive to maintain? Are they willing to?
(I know that there's lots of
7700 seems to be a very different beast from the existing 7000 too. No
hardware in common it seems.
Aled
On 26 June 2013 20:10, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k
Nothing at cisco live shows the nexus, asr, or cats going away anytime soon.
Ymmv
Scott
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k chassis ?
The new Catalyst
The 6708 supports up to 880 Gb per slot - whatever that means
Sent from a mobile device
On 27/06/2013, at 5:10, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:38:16PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k chassis ?
The
On Jun 27, 2013, at 3:40 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
But can cisco afford to have three quite similar product lines,
that are expensive to maintain?
Cisco isn't really a unitary company, it's a loose confederation of semi-feudal
fifedoms, each with its own PL. Effectively, they're separate
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
Cisco isn't really a unitary company, it's a loose confederation of
semi-feudal fifedoms, each with its own PL. Effectively, they're
separate companies utilizing a common branding/marketing framework and
shared administrative resources.
This
On Jun 27, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
It just seems like the new 6k is positioned to poach prospective customers
from the (arguably) higher-margin Nexus 7k product line.
Not 'just seems' - 'is'. Just as the new fixed-config one is positioned to
poach prospective customers
On 6/26/2013 11:10 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
It just seems like the new 6k is positioned to poach prospective
customers from the (arguably) higher-margin Nexus 7k product line.
Now that you mention the N-word I have to ask (as we're looking into a
deployment)... how much of it is ready for
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Jeff Kell wrote:
On 6/26/2013 11:10 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
It just seems like the new 6k is positioned to poach prospective
customers from the (arguably) higher-margin Nexus 7k product line.
Now that you mention the N-word I have to ask (as we're looking into a
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
wrote:
It just seems like the new 6k is positioned to poach prospective customers
from the (arguably) higher-margin Nexus 7k product line.
Looks like we will start needing to be careful with names to differentiate
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013, Rinse Kloek wrote:
Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k chassis ?
The new Catalyst 6807-XL chassis will be able to scale up to 220-880Gbps per
slot with feature linecards/sup. The chassis will be compatible with the
current SUP2T supervisor.
Also reading
Hi,
Can someone confirm rumors about the new Catalyst 6k chassis ?
The new Catalyst 6807-XL chassis will be able to scale up to 220-880Gbps
per slot with feature linecards/sup. The chassis will be compatible with
the current SUP2T supervisor.
Also reading there will be a fixed chassis
32 matches
Mail list logo
