Hi Mark,
Tried to DM you but didn't work. Can you DM?
Ty!
Ton
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 2:29 PM
> From: "Mark Tinka"
> To: netrav...@gmail.com, ring...@mail.com
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's
>
>
>
On 10/Sep/18 10:46, Netravnen wrote:
> Minimized usage of VLAN's in the core is my recommendation. And only
> VLAN's at edge ports.
> For the HA part. Having OSPF with ECMP would be my solution. Maybe
> doing the metric setting for links manually for all core ports with
> OSPF enabled to
Hi ringbit,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 19:32, wrote:
> 1. Is there a better way of doing the HA than having adjacencies to the
> router (can be 3 hops away) over two different VLANs and different OSPF cost
> over trunk links with BFD enabled?
Minimized usage of VLAN's in the core is my
Do your devices support IP/MPLS?
Mark.
On 9/Sep/18 23:22, ring...@mail.com wrote:
> Bump. Anyone?
>
>> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 at 10:47 PM
>> From: ring...@mail.com
>> To: "Mark Tinka"
>> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: R
Bump. Anyone?
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 at 10:47 PM
> From: ring...@mail.com
> To: "Mark Tinka"
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Would like to get back to this with some more questions.
>
uck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's
>
>
>
> On 23/Jul/18 16:41, Peter Rathlev wrote:
>
> > I'm also not sure I understand the first question. BFD is a way to
> > overcome certain failure scenarios if you need to use some kind of L2
> &
> Peter Rathlev
> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2018 3:42 PM
> To: ring...@mail.com
>
> On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 12:23 +0200, ring...@mail.com wrote:
> > Anyone else can give an opinion to those three questions?
>
> Opinions are easy to give. :-) Authority is a different question
altogether. I
> spend my
On 23/Jul/18 16:41, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> I'm also not sure I understand the first question. BFD is a way to
> overcome certain failure scenarios if you need to use some kind of L2
> transport between the routers. But the better way, since you ask, is to
> have two or more physically direct
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 12:23 +0200, ring...@mail.com wrote:
> Anyone else can give an opinion to those three questions?
Opinions are easy to give. :-) Authority is a different question
altogether. I spend my daytime in a place that started with just 6 PE
routers and has slowly grown to 51 over
Hi see inline,
> ring...@mail.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:32 PM
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have some practical design questions.
>
> 1. Is there a better way of doing the HA than having adjacencies to the
router
> (can be 3 hops away) over two different VLANs and different OSPF cost over
>
Anyone else can give an opinion to those three questions?
Thanks.
T.
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 at 12:43 AM
> From: "Aaron Gould"
> To: "Nick Cutting"
> Cc: "ring...@mail.com" , "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
>
> Subject: Re: [c-
day, July 19, 2018 6:08 PM
> To: ring...@mail.com
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's
>
> This message originates from outside of your organisation.
>
> If you think your network is going to continue to grow , dual route reflector
> cluster i
Quick question as I am clueless on large SP networks (I'm a MSP guy not an ISP
guy )- why not area 0.0.0.0 ?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Aaron Gould
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:08 PM
To: ring...@mail.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF
If you think your network is going to continue to grow , dual route reflector
cluster is a huge must have in my mind, I love how you can add address families
to one neighbor and let it bounce while the other neighbor stays up with all
your routes still there
I have ran a 100 node single area
On 19/Jul/18 21:32, ring...@mail.com wrote:
>
> 1. Is there a better way of doing the HA than having adjacencies to the
> router (can be 3 hops away) over two different VLANs and different OSPF cost
> over trunk links with BFD enabled?
I'd say don't run core links in VLAN's.
What
Hi all,
I have some practical design questions.
1. Is there a better way of doing the HA than having adjacencies to the router
(can be 3 hops away) over two different VLANs and different OSPF cost over
trunk links with BFD enabled?
2. Do you find less practical a MPLS network on a multi-area
16 matches
Mail list logo
