Peter,
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 12:13 +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
I have previously read the QoS SRND, but I must say I'm not impressed. I
know by testing that e.g. Auto-QoS doesn't solve the buffering problems
(it actually seems to worsen it) and I find the SRND somewhat
mechanically written. I
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 09:46 +1300, Raymond Lucas wrote:
Agree with others about RFC4594 being a particularly good discussion
of what different types of traffic there are and appropriate markings.
Thank you all for the pointers. I seems that RFC4594 is indeed a good
reference.
For quick Cisco
The 3560 buffering discussion has reminded me:
It's not hard to find documentation on configuring QoS, but I haven't
yet found any best practices reagarding how to specifically classify,
i.e. what traffic goes in what queue with what DSCP/CoS marking.
For VoIP it seems there are some notes, so
Hi,
The 3560 buffering discussion has reminded me:
It's not hard to find documentation on configuring QoS, but I haven't
yet found any best practices reagarding how to specifically classify,
i.e. what traffic goes in what queue with what DSCP/CoS marking.
For VoIP it seems there are some
The 3560 buffering discussion has reminded me:
It's not hard to find documentation on configuring QoS, but I haven't
yet found any best practices reagarding how to specifically classify,
i.e. what traffic goes in what queue with what DSCP/CoS marking.
RFC 4594 is a good start
For VoIP it
Peter,
Agree with others about RFC4594 being a particularly good discussion of
what different types of traffic there are and appropriate markings.
For quick Cisco overviews the At a Glance documents are quite good -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk759/tech_white_papers_list.html.
Also
