Re: [c-nsp] redundant VPNs

2008-02-22 Thread Wyatt Mattias Ishmael Jovial Gyllenvarg
I have done this (though without encryption) with 1801W units in both ends. Required some creative routing but works well when all is done. You will offcourse get a lower MTU then before. Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg Skycom AB A customer of ours has two sites, one with an 1800 the other

[c-nsp] redundant VPNs

2008-02-20 Thread Adam Greene
Hi, A customer of ours has two sites, one with an 1800 the other with a 2800. There's a point-to-point T1 connecting the locations. The two locations also have a backup link through my network via DSL. The customer wants to establish a VPN between the two locations over the ptp T1, and a

Re: [c-nsp] redundant VPNs

2008-02-20 Thread Church, Charles
29609 Office: 864-335-9473 | Cell: 864-266-3978 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:48 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] redundant VPNs Hi, A customer of ours has two sites

Re: [c-nsp] redundant VPNs

2008-02-20 Thread Luan Nguyen
1800/2800 should have no problem handling T1 VPN. Use AIM-SSL1/SSL2 encryption cards for them. Tag on Zone-base FW and IOS IPS and your customer should feel safe :) -lmn On Feb 20, 2008 11:48 AM, Adam Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, A customer of ours has two sites, one with an 1800