I was just wondering, what kind of VPN software people use for Windows
mobile to connect to Cisco. I know, Anyconnecy is one option. But what
about IPSEC?
Aivars
Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de writes:
Not that they are willing to ship an IPSEC VPN client for 64 bit windows...
There are
Hi,
Agreed. The Cisco IPSec Client on OS X is notorious causing kernel panics.
;-(
Kaj
From: Ian Henderson i...@ianh.net.au
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:13:31 -0800
To: Marc Haber mh+cisco-...@zugschlus.de
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
What is about the built in vpn-client from windows? Connect to a Cisco ASA
should be possible? Any experiances, someone?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Henderson; Marc Haber
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
Hi,
Agreed. The Cisco IPSec Client on OS X is notorious causing kernel
panics.
;-(
Kaj
From: Ian Henderson i...@ianh.net.au
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 20:13:31 -0800
To: Marc Haber mh+cisco
Yes (at least cisco ASA, not sure about IOS) will works fine with the built
in Windows client. (particularly useful for windows mobile devices without
begin extorted for a SSL vpn license, and then a mobile license on top of
it!). The only issue is without using certs, there's no tunnel-group
+cisco-...@zugschlus.de
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
Never had one in the last two years (10.5 through 10.6.2), connected
pretty much constantly.
TIA,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
The short answer is... no.
Cisco said they will never release a 64-bit version of their VPN Client.
However, Anyconnect has a 64-bit variant, however, this requires a
separate license for the ASA...
There is a third-party VPN client for 64-bit that works fine:
http://www.ncp-e.com/en.html
this one is free:
www.shrewsoft.com
Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0...@umn.edu
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking Telecommunications Services
Jonathan Charles wrote:
The short answer is... no.
Cisco said they will never release a 64-bit version of their VPN
...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ge Moua
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 11:34 AM
To: Jonathan Charles
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
this one is free:
www.shrewsoft.com
Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0
Jonathan Charles wrote:
The short answer is... no.
Cisco said they will never release a 64-bit version of their VPN Client.
So how does the cisco solution work on new systems going forward?
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net
not leak IPs.
Thanks,
Ozgur
--- On Wed, 9/12/09, Jonathan Charles jonv...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jonathan Charles jonv...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
To: Marc Haber mh+cisco-...@zugschlus.de
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Wednesday, 9 December, 2009, 16:20
Fields br...@bryanfields.net
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
Jonathan Charles wrote:
The short answer is... no.
Cisco said they will never release a 64-bit version of their VPN Client.
So how does
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:20:27AM -0600, Jonathan Charles wrote:
The short answer is... no.
So, IPSEC with a dedicated out-of-browser software is dead?
However, Anyconnect has a 64-bit variant, however, this requires a
separate license for the ASA...
I don't have ASAs, and I don't want
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:44:02AM -0500, Bryan Fields wrote:
Jonathan Charles wrote:
The short answer is... no.
Cisco said they will never release a 64-bit version of their VPN Client.
So how does the cisco solution work on new systems going forward?
Give money to Cisco and buy
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:18 PM
To: Bryan Fields
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
Hi
Have you looked into IOS SSL VPN? AnyConnect will work on IOS and supports
64 bit OS.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6657/product_data_sheet0900aecd80405e25.html
Brian
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Marc Haber
On 09.12.2009 16:20, Marc Haber wrote:
Unfortunately, Cisco seems to have decided to not ship the standard
VPN client for 64 bit Windows variants, which are increasingly often
used out in the wild. They refer to the AnyConnect VPN Client which,
to my knowledge, can only connect to an ASA and
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:43:22AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
This is the best plan unless you want to migrate to anyconnect.
What are the (dis)advantages of anyconnect?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber |
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:43:22AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
This is the best plan unless you want to migrate to anyconnect.
What are the (dis)advantages of anyconnect?
Extra license cost, vendor lock-in, no open standard.
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:32:27PM -0500, LITTLEFIELD James wrote:
Which is why we opted to migrate all of our VPN to Juniper :-)
Not that they are willing to ship an IPSEC VPN client for 64 bit windows...
But you can buy our SSL VPN appliance!!! (which isn't even a proper
Junos box).
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:16:35PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:43:22AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
This is the best plan unless you want to migrate to anyconnect.
What are the (dis)advantages of
Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:16:35PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:43:22AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
This is the best plan unless you want to migrate to anyconnect.
What are the
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:36:53PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
As if Cisco's IPSEC was particularly interoperable.
Now that's the basic problem with IPSEC. IPSEC as it is is not really
suited for road-warrior auto-conf type setups, and as such, vendors had
to improve it...
Any
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:32:27PM -0500, LITTLEFIELD James wrote:
Which is why we opted to migrate all of our VPN to Juniper :-)
We migrated from Netscreen to Cisco a few years ago after the XP SP2
desaster of the Juniper NSR Client. Additionally, the VPN connections
with the Cisco gear
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco VPN and 64 bit Windows
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:16:35PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:43:22AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
This is the best plan unless you want to migrate to anyconnect
Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de writes:
Not that they are willing to ship an IPSEC VPN client for 64 bit windows...
There are vendors other than C and J, and one of them recently lowered
the price for its basic PC client software (available for 64-bit Windows
as well) to 0...
/Benny
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Marc Haber wrote:
What are the (dis)advantages of anyconnect?
- It works in more places than IPSec - mostly hotels with dodgy firewalls.
- Its easier to configure for the user. Send them to a URL, enter username
and password, client downloads, installs, configures
27 matches
Mail list logo
