Hi,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:15:13PM -0400, Pete S. wrote:
The biggest running issue I have with SXH,
My biggest issues are:
- no BFD on SVIs (worked fine in SXF)
- the BGP ghost bug is back :-(
(SXH3 regularily forgets to send withdraws to iBGP peers if a prefix
completely
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:15:13PM -0400, Pete S. wrote:
The biggest running issue I have with SXH,
My biggest issues are:
- no BFD on SVIs (worked fine in SXF)
- the BGP ghost bug is back :-(
(SXH3 regularily forgets to send withdraws to iBGP peers
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:02:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote:
- the BGP ghost bug is back :-(
Yes, the nasty BGP bug is present. The only solution seems to be a
periodically clear ip bgp all.
Cisco IOS Software, s6523_rp Software (s6523_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M),
Version 12.2(33)SXH3,
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:02:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote:
- the BGP ghost bug is back :-(
Yes, the nasty BGP bug is present. The only solution seems to be a
periodically clear ip bgp all.
Cisco IOS Software, s6523_rp Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Lastest one running SXH1. No problems so far with FWSM, ACE and 6748s.
we've got a 12.2(33)SXH3 box up and alive now - so far so much
better than SXH2 (and 2b) but we've yet to drive packets through
in anger. certainly looks like we might be SXH'd by the new
Hi,
we've got a 12.2(33)SXH3 box up and alive now - so far so much
better than SXH2 (and 2b) but we've yet to drive packets through
in anger. certainly looks like we might be SXH'd by the new year
(but dont quote me on that! ;-) )
Just don't try and scp anything from it...
8-) dont worry
We've been running a mix od SXF, and SXH (un)fortunately.
SXF is pretty solid. If you don't have any features(like VPN,
adjust-mss specifically), or modules which require an SXH train(i.e.
6716) I'd suggest you stick with safe harbor SXF.
The biggest running issue I have with SXH, is not
Hi,
Lastest one running SXH1. No problems so far with FWSM, ACE and 6748s.
we've got a 12.2(33)SXH3 box up and alive now - so far so much
better than SXH2 (and 2b) but we've yet to drive packets through
in anger. certainly looks like we might be SXH'd by the new year
(but dont quote me on
: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Antonio Acuesta (DHL AU) wrote:
Hi,
Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513?
The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3. The switch has
not been upgraded for a while and it will be good to know the version
with less bug
Hi,
Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513?
The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3. The switch has
not been upgraded for a while and it will be good to know the version
with less bug.
Thanks.
Tony
___
Antonio Acuesta (DHL AU) wrote:
Hi,
Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513?
The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3. The switch has
not been upgraded for a while and it will be good to know the version
with less bug.
We're running 12.2(18)SXF10
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Antonio Acuesta
(DHL AU)
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 16:21 PM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Hi,
Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513?
The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:20:41PM +0800, Antonio Acuesta (DHL AU) wrote:
Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513?
The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3. The switch has
not been upgraded for a while and it will be good to know the version
13 matches
Mail list logo
