[c-nsp] TDM over IP

2007-08-15 Thread alaerte.vidali
Hi, Have you used it? I followed draft and Cisco implementation. Now looking for field problems related to clock. Tks. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] pix and css 11501

2007-08-15 Thread jason . plank
It is not rare to have the loadbalancing device on inside, in fact it's pretty common. What is weird to me that the server subnet is on the PIX AND behind the CSS. That makes very little sense. I would create a subnet different than the DMZ subnet for behind the CSS. He needs to make sure the

Re: [c-nsp] PPPOE DNS Question

2007-08-15 Thread Stephen Kratzer
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 09:19:08 Paul Stewart wrote: Hi folks... This may seem like a silly question but I can't find a doc to confirm this We have 7206VXR's for LAC/LNS termination (PPPOE). When a client connects and successfully authenticates against our Radius servers, where

Re: [c-nsp] PPPOE DNS Question

2007-08-15 Thread raj.2.panchal
You would be having virtual template for ur pppoe dialin clients .. On that virtual template you need to configure ppp ipcp dns command and specify ur dns You can even have radius to handle dns assignement per user / per group of user .. In that case ur virtual template assignement will be

[c-nsp] 7204vxr freeze-up question

2007-08-15 Thread Adam Greene
Hi, I'm running into an issue with a 7204VXR/NPE-300 router with 128MB RAM. A 1000Base-SX GBIC is plugged into one of the slots (not sure of the part # of the card into which the GBIC plugs). We were running some dueling gateways speed tests with the router (packet stream is sent via iPerf to

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities in Cisco VPN Client

2007-08-15 Thread Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities in Cisco VPN Client Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20070815-vpnclient http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20070815-vpnclient.shtml Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2007 August

Re: [c-nsp] VPN client 64 bit

2007-08-15 Thread Joel M Snyder
Personally, I don't understand why SSL VPN is perceived as a Better(TM) solution than IPSec VPN, but maybe that's just me. Maybe what is better, is the fact that SSL VPN is licensed? SSL VPN uses port 443 and TCP, and while those of us who know networks would much prefer the IP-protocol

Re: [c-nsp] VPN client 64 bit

2007-08-15 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 14:35 -0700, Voll, Scott wrote: Not the SSL client but the IPSEC client. There is no such thing as a 64-bit IPSec client for Windows and I've been told there will be no such thing, and that Anyconnect is the client moving forward. Personally, I don't understand why SSL VPN

[c-nsp] OSM module on 7613

2007-08-15 Thread Leonardo Souza
Hi mates. I have one 7613 (SUP720-3BXL/MSFC3) router running with an Enhanced 4-port OC-3/STM-1 SONET/SDH SM-IR OSM, w/ 4 GE Rev. 1.0 PID: OSM-4OC3-POS-SI+. On these GE interfaces we are running MPLS and OSPF, but we are getting giant frames on them, even with mpls mtu 1516.

Re: [c-nsp] PPPOE DNS Question

2007-08-15 Thread Robert Blayzor
Paul Stewart wrote: Am going to implement ppp ipcp dns so that we have specific control over it's assignment... Of course if you have a common template, but different users use different name servers, etc, sending them back in the RADIUS profile always works to: cisco-avpair =

Re: [c-nsp] OSM module on 7613

2007-08-15 Thread Phil Bedard
What is the interface MTU? I think on the PFC-based MPLS the MPLS MTU needs to be lower than the MPLS MTU, but I'm not sure about the OSM. Phil On Aug 15, 2007, at 6:38 PM, Leonardo Souza wrote: Hi mates. I have one 7613 (SUP720-3BXL/MSFC3) router running with an Enhanced 4-port

Re: [c-nsp] 7204vxr freeze-up question

2007-08-15 Thread Masood Ahmad Shah
Well, which IOS version you run? I know there are some issues with Intel chipset while it gets connected into cisco GBIC. I strongly suggest updating driver of NIC (if there is), upgrade IOS or change your NIC to check it out... Regards, Masood Ahmad Shah -Original Message- From:

Re: [c-nsp] TDM over IP

2007-08-15 Thread Piper, James
We evaluated TDM over Packet Transport for our internal use and found it to perform well. Here are the results... - Platforms Evaluated Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) (as a performance baseline) Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks (VLAN) incorporating Cisco