At any particular time only one ethernet is active at a time and the second
provides redundancy.
My question is how do I avoid an ip conflict on the switch an Ericsson Media
Gateway for Mobile Networks (M-MGw) R5.
You don't need to do anything special at all. Just make sure that the two
hi,
there can be the occasional bug or glitch - mainly (in
our experience) due to new types of traffic on the network.
our main downtimes are due to power outage (in excess of
our UPS 6hr capability) and firmware updates.
however, you can help to negate any IOS issue by eg
using dual supervisors
Hello,
We've been asked to asses some network parameters regarding a SLA for an
important business system. We've worked out the usual stuff with MTBF
and line reliability and so forth.
What we don't have is some kind of statistical material on the stability
of the IOS software we're running. The
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:18 +, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
there can be the occasional bug or glitch - mainly (in
our experience) due to new types of traffic on the network.
our main downtimes are due to power outage (in excess of
our UPS 6hr capability) and firmware updates.
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:18:06AM +, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
...and safeharbor is always a good option unless you cant use it (eg
new a feature thats not in a safeharbor release!)
Don't put too much stock on the Safe Harbor label. We have an
internal control to only run Safe Harbor
From what you said about the process CPU 99/96, the routers aren't doing
anything processed intensive. Assuming that was what you meant: CPU
utilization for five seconds: 99/96.
Getting 35Mbs VPN throughput for the 2811 with AIM-VPN/SSL-2 is best case
scenario for that model already. You could
Ross Vandegrift wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:18:06AM +, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
...and safeharbor is always a good option unless you cant use it (eg
new a feature thats not in a safeharbor release!)
Don't put too much stock on the Safe Harbor label. We have an
internal
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:18:06AM +, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Most of the crashes have been related to SNMP. For many MIBs, if you
poll an object at the same time it is changed/removed, there's a race
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Global Site Selector Appliances DNS
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090107-gss
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090107-gss.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009 January 07 1600 UTC (GMT
I have a ONS that I am backing up over TL1. If I run the program I wrote
to handle the TL1 manually, it works after a couple of tries. If I
connect in directly and type the commands, it runs properly almost every
time.
Running from cron, I always get an error about the database being busy.
JUNOS guys promise they would not make it boring! If you don't want to
configure something on JUNOS, spend some time with JUNOS haiku.
http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/archive/2009/01/07/juniper-junos-funny-poetry.as
px
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Peter Rathlev wrote:
We're mostly running C6k with 12.2SXF and 7200 with 12.4 main, and I
know it's very complicated to give some figures, but do any of you know
of any studies regarding IOS stability in general?
Its a lot like the reliability of hard drives. If it runs for three
weeks it
Can any Cisco people tell me if when a router or switch (router in this
case) is at the initial setup prompt after the very first power-on if
the router enables DHCP on it's interfaces? I believe I had a brand-new
7201 running a 12.4T attempt a DHCP DISCOVER while it was at the initial
setup
13 matches
Mail list logo
