Hi, i cleaned the modules of 6509 and reinstalled, it shows
inband gmac link did not come up: reseting the system
System Bootstrap, Version 7.1(1)
Copyright (c) 1994-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
c6k_sup2 processor with 262144 Kbytes of main memory
Autoboot executing command: boot bootflash:
Dear All,
Any recommendations for a stable *IOS* supporting Voice
application on Cisco2811 and 3845
Thanks in advance!
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
You can try this, it should answer some questions.
http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps259/products_tech_note09186a00800e73f6.shtml
Regards
Simon
Dear All,
Any recommendations for a stable *IOS* supporting Voice
application on Cisco2811 and 3845
Thanks in advance!
Some prefer to take that risk instead of being exposed to some security holes.
Sometimes the only alternative is to make a major
upgrade what is not necessarily a good thing.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP)
amsoa...@netcabo.pt
-Original Message-
From:
dear all.
types of fiber converters
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:30:32AM -0800, Hector Herrera wrote:
I'm currently using a 3550-12t for the task, with the only drawback
that the cpu hits 99% load with a 5000 packets per sec./40Mbps
combined throughput on the load-balanced links. The two 100Mbps
uplinks never reach more than
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:11:22 -0500
From: Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com
To: 'Peter Rathlev' pe...@rathlev.dk
Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Differences between 3750-E and 3560-E switches
Message-ID:
Scott,
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Differences between 3750-E and 3560-E switches
maybe even look at the 295x or 296x platform unless you possibly need
POE as
well - the 2s don't
hi all i have metro ethernet 3750
i want to enable cache flow in order to monitor some traffic on our leased line
customers
i enabled under the vlan interface
ip route-cache flow
but nothing appeard even when i enabled ip cef accounting non-recursive
[Apologies for any duplication if you've seen this notification on other lists.]
We've just posted the 2009 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report for
download at this URL:
http://www.arbornetworks.com/report
This year's WWISR is based upon the broadest set of survey data collected by
On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
but nothing appeard even when i enabled ip cef accounting non-recursive
I don't think 3750s support NetFlow.
Also, that's the old syntax; the new syntax is ip flow ingress/egress on newer
platforms/trains/revisions, FYI.
That's correct. I believe that NONE of the fixed switches support
Netflow, even the 4900s, which are basically fixed form 4500's.
Amongst the 4500's, only the Sup V 10 GE supports it natively, though
there is a daughter card you can buy to support it on the regular Sup
V (IIRC). Sup 6E does not.
Netflow is on only supported on the 4500 with the newer Supervisor Engines,
and on the 6500 platform.
Regards,
Andrew Gabriel.
Network Engineer,
Enterprise Data Services.
+91 44 42 22 88 75 (Direct)
+91 98 41 41 40 19 (Mobile)
www.sanmina-sci.com
Sanmina-SCI India Pvt. Ltd.
A51, 2nd Avenue, Anna
what is the alternative for that ?
is it supported on ME 6524 ??
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:47:00 -0600
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ip route cache flow
From: ge...@pendery.net
To: jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.com
CC: eng_m...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
That's correct. I believe
On Jan 20, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Netflow is on only supported on the 4500 with the newer Supervisor Engines,
and on the 6500 platform.
It's also important to note that 4500 NetFlow has the same caveats as 6500/7600
NetFlow with a Sup2.
Is it ip accounting an option for you?
Not as useful as netflow but it might just give you what you need
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khalil
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:58 PM
To:
You could use a probe or span your traffic to an analyzer. This is what I do
to monitor some links that traverse devices that do not support NetFlow.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mohammad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS XR Software SSH Denial of Service
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100120-xr-ssh
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2010 January 20 1600 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: CiscoWorks Internetwork Performance Monitor
CORBA GIOP Overflow Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100120-ipm
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2010 January 20 1600 UTC (GMT
I've read through the data sheets, and I also can't see any
signficant
differences. I was wondering if there was some hardware differences
(like
CAM table size, ethernet input/output buffer sizes), etc...
Is the packet buffering on the -Es significantly better than on the
non-Es? It would
Hello all,
I am observing a strange issue where I have an interface that is showing zero
packets/sec. The packets input and packets output are incrementing. My SNMP
collector is graphing. This is one of two interconnect ports to a customer
peering up with two BGP sessions using multipath. The
Have you tried replacing the lithium battery on the sup2?
Hopefully you have a newer board with a socket.
- Kevin
ambedkar wrote:
Hi, i cleaned the modules of 6509 and reinstalled, it shows
inband gmac link did not come up: reseting the system
System Bootstrap, Version 7.1(1)
Copyright (c)
Just to be clear, it is only supported with the *second* newest, the
Sup V 10GE. NetFlow is NOT supported on the newest, the Sup 6E. So
it was actually removed from the 4500's going forward. At this time
the E series 4500 stuff, the latest-and-greatest, does NOT support
NetFlow.
I just rolled
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 07:19 -0600, scott owens wrote:
That stacking feature IS the cool thing. If you don't need it; skip
it, maybe even look at the 295x or 296x platform unless you possibly
need POE as well - the 2s don't support it. But the ability to
team/etherchannel servers via LACP and
If you use WCCP (i.e., wan acceleration/WAAS), the 3750-E supports denies in
the redirect ACL whereas the 3560-E does not. Apparently this feature will
be added to the 3560-E this Spring. It maybe minor but it's very annoying
have to create an entire ACL based on permits to control your
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 06:11:10PM +0200, Ziv Leyes wrote:
Is it ip accounting an option for you?
Not supported on 3750 either.
These things are *switches*, with some l3 support added. Fast, but dumb.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Seth,
I would say that the right approach for this would be to tune the logic
of your NMS system to ignore these events, or make them low-priority
events, and have a rule that alerts you about low-priority events only
during work hours...
Another approach (but only relatively new IOS versions)
And supported on 6500 doesn't equate to works as you'd expect on 6500.
It's better in SXI (per interface support at least) but it's still got major
limitations. We only have netflow on Cat6k left in one location and that's
being moved to routers real soon now.
David
...
On 21/01/2010, at
I'am looking for a good solution to separate multiple branches from each
other by using a central firewall setup. The overall view looks like that:
Branch-1 Branch-n
(PC1) (PCn)
| |
(SW1) (SWn)
| |
CPE1 ...CPEn
| |
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Gerald Krause wrote:
For now I see 3 options for us:
a) implement dedicated VRFs for each branch and map VRFn-VLANn on the RTRs
b) build a brigded L2 LAN from the CPE Dialer-Interfaces up to the
Firewall-Ethernet Interface (how? bad idea?)
c) some other brilliant
I'am looking for a good solution to separate multiple branches from
each
other by using a central firewall setup. The overall view looks like
that:
[...]
The () components will be under control of the customer, all other
systems are managed by us. The main goals are
1) separate the
31 matches
Mail list logo
