Hi all,
Wondering if anyone has experience with the 3745 and NM-1A-E3,
specifically how many can you jam into one of these.
According to the datasheet, 2 is the recommended maximum, but I am
wondering if the router will accept/recognise 3 of these cards and allow
you to use all of them?
Cheers,
Hi,
I have test setup with three routers R2/R3/R4, they running OSPF, R2
and R3 injecting default with default-information originate always
metric 20, R4 already sees default route from both
R4#sh ip route 0.0.0.0
Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet
Known via ospf 2, distance 110, metric 20,
Hi,
We faced problem of two FWSM in different chassis Cisco 6513,went into
active/active state suddenly. Though they are configured as active/passive
and running normally for 1 year.
Any clue what has happened.
Regards
Jawwad Paracha
IBM
___
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Anton Kapela wrote:
On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Stephen Cobb wrote:
Check out the top of rack switch recommendations thread that started a couple
days back. IPv6 has parity with v4 in 12.2(50)-ish IOS, even on the 3550's, so people are
claiming. This might help.
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 12:31 +0500, Muhammad Jawwad Paracha wrote:
We faced problem of two FWSM in different chassis Cisco 6513,went into
active/active state suddenly. Though they are configured as
active/passive and running normally for 1 year.
Any clue what has happened.
The logs should
Control-plane traffic is governed by pak_priority inside the router
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk544/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094612.shtml
This document is pretty old and doesn't reflect newer platforms, though
basics remain the same I believe.
Some little bit is also here:
Hi,
We are using Cisco asa5550, and i want to put a url based acl/filteration for
the particular client.
We have one client on inside interface who needs the access of www.youtube.com
only(outside interface) and to restrict the same we are not able to restrict
through IP acl's as Youtube
Hi,
We use rancid to retrieve configs from our cisco kit, recently one of
our 6500s (s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9_WAN-M Version 12.2(33)SXH3) has
started reporting nvram content changes sporadically throughout the day, eg:
!Flash: nvram: Directory of nvram:/
!Flash: nvram: 1918 -rw-
Hi,
We use rancid to retrieve configs from our cisco kit, recently one of
our 6500s (s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9_WAN-M Version 12.2(33)SXH3) has
started reporting nvram content changes sporadically throughout the day, eg:
!Flash: nvram: Directory of nvram:/
!Flash: nvram: 1918 -rw-
Try Google or Bing with search string asa inspect http regex
The example given below is for blocking certain websites but you should be able
to come up with a configuration that only allows certain sites and block
everything else.
Hi Vijay,
Thanks for the reply,
I have checked and try to do but facing issue as the example given is too
complicated and its difficult to do the test on the production Environment,
Can you share a example to allowing the access for a single site.
I am very thankfull to you.
Regards
Also, have a look at:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1268
Sincerely,
David.
Ramcharan, Vijay A wrote:
Try Google or Bing with search string asa inspect http regex
The example given below is for blocking certain websites but you should be
able to come up with a configuration that
This typically happens if someone is viewing the startup-config (eg: show conf)
as it is locked.
- Jared
On Mar 19, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Ben Cooper wrote:
Hi,
We use rancid to retrieve configs from our cisco kit, recently one of
our 6500s (s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9_WAN-M Version
I suggest running the scenario through Dynamips and PEMU for test
purposes so you don't affect production traffic.
AFAIK, the configuration unfortunately doesn't really get simpler than
what the URL provided.
Out of the box URL filtering requires RegEx and an MPF configuration.
Regarding
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:19:03AM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
No to thread Hijack, but how do you guys handle injecting /32s for
null/blackhole into your upstream providers?
Using a tag on the static route? with a route-map that matches the tag? which
then adds a community?
thanks,
We have had two upgrades on a 7204VXR platform where we went from a G1 to a
G2 controller.
Case A is a pretty straightforward BGP with 2 full feeds, 400Mbps aggregate
traffic @72,000pps.
Case A upgraded to 12.4XD train from 12.3 mainline
Case B is a L2TP LNS, aggregating around 3000 PPPoE
On Mar 19, 2010, at 5:48 AM, Andriy Bilous wrote:
Control-plane traffic is governed by pak_priority inside the router
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk544/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094612.shtml
This document is pretty old and doesn't reflect newer platforms, though
basics
Feature Navigator is wrong - as usual. 3550 does not have hw support for
IPv6, therefore no support for it. No plan, according to BU (have this
info via our account manager), to support
IPv6 on these switches. Go for 3560 or 3750
Best Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
What's
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t14/feature/guide/miragenm.html#wp1820427
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t14/feature/guide/miragenm.html#wp1820427good
luck!
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland
a...@rn.dk wrote:
Hi all.
Can someone
Hey guys - I saw something in a previous forum (can't recall where) that
talked about this. You won't actually see increased performance on the G2
till you're getting into high CPU utilization, where the G1 would kick the
can and the G2 does its spec'd job...something about the different
Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:40:20AM -0400, Jared Mauch:
This typically happens if someone is viewing the startup-config (eg: show
conf) as it is locked.
afaict, reading nor writing locks the nvram fsys in such a way that
dir /all nvram:, the command rancid uses, fails. it seems to wait
as you'd
Found what I was talking about...this may explain things:
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2007-April/03.html
-SC
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Stephen Cobb sc...@telecoast.com wrote:
Hey guys - I saw something in a previous forum (can't recall where) that
talked about
This is related to the forwarding address of 0.0.0.0; check this out:
https://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/paws/13682/10.pdf
It should help you fix it.
Leah
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David
Bingo!
Yes, I agree, it's worse. I knew the 3550 only did ipv6 in software, but this
was going to be a low packet count test. Something things seem to work, but
not really.
Oh well, that division budgets won't be available to upgrade that switch until
after Sept 2011, so it will have to wait.
I'm looking for something that can:
(1) handle about 100mbit (microbursting to gig) of mcast, taking it in
interface A and pushing it out interfaces B and C, and maybe D
(2) sustain 500-800mbit of throughput (assume 100-byte packets,
occasional gig burst) coming in interface B and going out C,
What type of interfaces do you need? IF just Ethernet, why not look at a 3560-E
with IP services or a 4900M
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Bacon
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 3:42 PM
To:
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Huff mh...@ox.com
To: 'Jeff Bacon' ba...@walleyesoftware.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1 / G2 performance
What type of interfaces do you need? IF just Ethernet, why not look at a
We had a solution involving NAT on some 6500s - it didn't take long
for them to run out of memory reboot. Cisco eventually said there
was a limitation of ~57K NAT translations on the PFC3B. We added a
ip nat translation max-entries 5
to the configs and asked our security office to pretty
28 matches
Mail list logo
