Hello,
I met an interesting issue: there is a Cisco 7200 NPE-G2 with
12.4(24)T7, this router terminates some broadband users, we applied
shaping on the virtual-template and we surprised: shaping was not working.
We upgraded (downgraded?) to 12.2(33)SRE6 and the shaping was working
properly,
On 29/10/2012 7:11 PM, BALLA Attila wrote:
Hello,
I met an interesting issue: there is a Cisco 7200 NPE-G2 with
12.4(24)T7, this router terminates some broadband users, we applied
shaping on the virtual-template and we surprised: shaping was not
working. We upgraded (downgraded?) to
Hi,
I am facing a problem in multicast..
The scenario is like this, 2 layer-2 switches(2950) and 1 Layer-1
switch(cisco 6509).
These three switches are connected in series, L2-L3-L2. The problem is the
packets are dropping at L3(Cisco 6509) switch using catOS. The multicast
data is flowing in SAME
On 10/29/2012 10:18 AM, Ambedkar wrote:
Hi,
I am facing a problem in multicast..
The scenario is like this, 2 layer-2 switches(2950) and 1 Layer-1
switch(cisco 6509).
These three switches are connected in series, L2-L3-L2. The problem is the
packets are dropping at L3(Cisco 6509) switch using
We used to collect full unsampled Netflow from two 7613 routers. Both ran
12.2(18)SXF11 and all was well.
We continue to get flow data as follows from the 12.2(18)SXF router:
Flow export v5 is enabled for main cache
Exporting flows to xxx.139.197.76 (9800) xx.229.0.7 ()
Exporting using
Hi,
I would like to have your feedback on the question that is often raised
about the combined throughput of a MLPPP bundle with asymetric DSL links. I
have come across quite a few documents claiming that the bundle will have
the combined bandwidth of all the links, but that mostly refers to
Couple of things:
1) What is the TTL set on the packets? If it is set to 1, it won't cross a L3
boundry.
2) On the Layer 3 switches, what are the multicast settings on the L3
interfaces (pim sparse, pim dense, etc...)
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot
up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP).
VMware says it's a ASA issue with Proxy arp. I have turned off proxy arp.
Is there something else that may be causing these issues?
TIA
Scott
VLANs are not properly set up between the VMs and the hardware switch
ports.
Regards,
Ifti
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
Sent: 29 October 2012 15:40
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject:
ASA version?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:40 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Duplicate IP's.
We have VM's and now Desktops that are
Hi folks,
Is there a special foo that needs to be enabled for these two to start
exchanging states please?
I'm struggling with a basic setup CE--PE--p2p-mpls-PW--PE--CE (PEs are
ASR9k, CEs are 2811)
When I shut down the interface on one end I'd like to see it down on the
other end as well
I also
Care to expand?
Scott
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Iftikhar Mehar iftikhar.me...@maxima.co.uk
wrote:
VLANs are not properly set up between the VMs and the hardware switch
ports.
Regards,
Ifti
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
8.4.4.5
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com wrote:
ASA version?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 11:40 AM
To:
Yes make sure the VLANs are correctly expanded from the virtual NIC all
the way through to the physical switch port.
Regards,
Ifti
From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 October 2012 16:34
To: Iftikhar Mehar
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT:
Scott,
Can you post a sanitized output of show nat. I know you said you have
proxy-arp turned off, but it does sound like a nat (inside,any) statement
that's causing the issue.
-ryan
From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 12:34 PM
To: Ryan West
Cc:
On 10/29/12 8:40 AM, Scott Voll wrote:
We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on boot
up when they have a static IP configured (and there is not duplicate IP).
Does the duplicate IP error show the MAC address of the conflicting
device? If so, what have you done to
I'm familiar with a bug CSCsk07136 that was found about 4 years ago that
causes the multicast table to dump on a hybrid 6500 (catos) every time a
port in the same VLAN went down/up. Basically, all members of a group
would lose access to the group every time a port in the same VLAN, on the
same
Hi,
On 30 October 2012 05:14, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk wrote:
Hi folks,
Is there a special foo that needs to be enabled for these two to start
exchanging states please?
I'm struggling with a basic setup CE--PE--p2p-mpls-PW--PE--CE (PEs are
ASR9k, CEs are 2811)
When I shut down
No, it does not show a mac for the dup ip. I could only wish.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote:
On 10/29/12 8:40 AM, Scott Voll wrote:
We have VM's and now Desktops that are getting Duplicate IP errors on
boot
up when they have a static IP configured (and
Anyone,
Been googling for an hour, can't find anything definitive.
Trying to go LACP between an ASR (using 2 built-in gig ports) and a switch
stack (3750 or 2960S). Would like to use the fast mode of LACP PDUs ('lacp
rate fast' on the ASR). This command doesn't seem to exist
On 29/10/2012 11:52, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
This used to work pre-12.2(33)SRE. Something must have changed that we are
not aware of that needs to be defined. Any ideas?
It's been a couple of years since I've run sxf, but I had an idea in the
back of my mind that I ran into something similar
The local config determines the remote transmit interval but not all devices
support fast PDUs. They can be mismatched. This is from the spec not Ciscos
implementation persay.
Phil
On Oct 29, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Chuck Church chuckchu...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone,
Been
22 matches
Mail list logo