Re: [c-nsp] ISR4431-AX/K9

Thanks, Chuck, for the helpful response. My further research corroborates what you say. Miercom has an interesting study showing enabling QoS on 4431 does not affect total throughput: http://miercom.com/pdf/reports/20150817.pdf. However, enabling FnF & NBAR2 might ... It looks like getting the

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

On 13/07/16 15:13, Jared Mauch wrote: > There were improvements that went in 533+ which should improve your > experience. I haven't checked if 602 hit CCO but you may want to look > at that, or wait for 534. Neither 6.0.2 or 5.3.4 has hit GA yet. 6.0.1 is (oddly) marked as MD rather than ED, too.

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

On 13/07/16 22:52, Mark Tinka wrote: > > On 13/Jul/16 23:46, Curtis Piehler wrote: > >> > So going from 5.1.X to 6.X.X will likely involve fpd upgrades? > I've, pretty much, found an FPD update in every major release. That has been my expectation - usually at least one component has a new FW

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

On 13/Jul/16 23:46, Curtis Piehler wrote: > So going from 5.1.X to 6.X.X will likely involve fpd upgrades? I've, pretty much, found an FPD update in every major release. Mark. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

So going from 5.1.X to 6.X.X will likely involve fpd upgrades? I've been hit by the SNMP OID bug that consumes memory over time but I can hold out by restarting the SNMP process every once in a while. On Jul 13, 2016 4:39 PM, "Gert Doering" wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 13,

Re: [c-nsp] 40G options for 6807

On 13/07/16 20:24, Peter Kranz wrote: > For instance, the C6800-32P10G is labelled as an 8 Port 40GE/32 Port 10GE > module, but there is no software release yet that supports the 40G > operational mode, nor have I seen the required CVR-4SFP-QSFP adaptor > available. I would expect Nick meant 40G

Re: [c-nsp] ISR4431-AX/K9

I happen to be staring at an ISR4431/K9 with the APPX license (purchased for the L2 features), and it allows nbar configuration for ipv4 and ipv6. I have none without said license pre-loaded, so cannot confirm if it's required or not. It doesn't seem to complain or spam the license EULA if I

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

Hi, On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:30:11PM +0200, Juergen Marenda wrote: > Because of > https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco- > sa-20160525-ipv6 > asr9k: https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuz66542 > > it should be 5.3.4.1 or for the brave

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

Because of https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco- sa-20160525-ipv6 asr9k: https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuz66542 it should be 5.3.4.1 or for the brave 6.1.1.16 but I cannt see it for download (but 5.3.3 two times ! ) ... waiting for a fix

Re: [c-nsp] 40G options for 6807

There is the newish high-density 10-G modules that will support 40G as well http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-6800-seri es-switches/datasheet-c78-733662.html For instance, the C6800-32P10G is labelled as an 8 Port 40GE/32 Port 10GE module, but there is no software

Re: [c-nsp] ISR4431-AX/K9

I believe NBAR 2 is in the AVX bundle, but there is normal NBAR support in the other bundles. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:50 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] ISR4431-AX/K9

Isn't WAAS their WAN acceleration product? I don't think NBAR has any reliance on that. You just use NBAR to identify the traffic, then normal QOS policy to do something with it. I haven't done it on an ASR or ISR 4K, but that's how it's worked on all previous devices. Chuck -Original

[c-nsp] Nexus 56xx switch-profile problem after upgrade

Hello, We have upgraded a pair of Nexus 5672 from 7.2(1)N1(1) to 7.3(0)N1(1). We now have a switch-profile commit error related to spanning-tree. In the running configuration (sh run) we have: spanning-tree pseudo-information vlan 1-3967, 4048-4093 root priority 0 In the switch-profile

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS XR for NCS 6000 Packet Timer Leak Denial of Service Vulnerability

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS XR for NCS 6000 Packet Timer Leak Denial of Service Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20160713-ncs6k Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2016 July 13 16:00 UTC (GMT

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

On 13/Jul/16 16:13, Jared Mauch wrote: > We see around 1 hour of traffic loss due to upgrade times before adding in > FPD and others, which can extend to more like 3 hours. Yep, I'd say budget a 3hr window per router for the upgrade. Mark. ___

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

We see around 1 hour of traffic loss due to upgrade times before adding in FPD and others, which can extend to more like 3 hours. There were improvements that went in 533+ which should improve your experience. I haven't checked if 602 hit CCO but you may want to look at that, or wait for 534.

[c-nsp] ASR 9000 Upgrade Expectations

Hello, looking for some details in regards to an ASR9000 code upgrade. Currently running software version 5.1.1 with the following packages: Committed Packages: disk0:asr9k-mini-px-5.1.1 disk0:asr9k-k9sec-px-5.1.1 disk0:asr9k-mpls-px-5.1.1 disk0:asr9k-mgbl-px-5.1.1 disk0:asr9k-optic-px-5.1.1

Re: [c-nsp] 40G options for 6807

Supposedly there will be new 40G, 10G and 100G modules in the coming months. See Sales Connect. -pavel On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Nick Cutting wrote: > Any new 40g modules coming out/been released for the 6807? > > Or still just > > WS-X6904-40G-2T > > Where is the

[c-nsp] 40G options for 6807

Any new 40g modules coming out/been released for the 6807? Or still just WS-X6904-40G-2T Where is the love for this golden chassis monster ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] err-disable state on a cisco 3750 catalyst

On 12 July 2016 at 19:41, Olivier CALVANO wrote: > Hi > > i have a big problems with one cisco 3750 : > > > Jul 12 17:30:36.218: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: channel-misconfig error detected on > Gi1/0/1, putting Gi1/0/1 in err-disable state > Jul 12 17:30:36.856: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: