Re: [c-nsp] IOS XR filter route from OSPF?

Are you running BFD on the link as well? On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 8:33 AM Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp < cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Can you point me towards a hint on how you implement import/export filters > in OSPF on IOS XR? > > Are you referring to 'distribute lists'? > > Another thing

Re: [c-nsp] Internet border router recommendations and experiences

https://apps.juniper.net/home/port-checker/index.html nice website to check port mix capabilities. -Aaron On 2/22/2023 5:06 PM, Thomas Scott via cisco-nsp wrote: Yes - 400 Gbps throughput total If I recall correctly. The MX204 has four rate-selectable ports that can be configured as 100

Re: [c-nsp] How can one escalate within Cisco TAC?

i think the problem is they let the good ones go. On Wednesday, February 8, 2023, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp < cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > > On 2/8/23 10:23, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote: > > Working would be much more pleasurable if half the >> world's white collar workers wouldn't be

Re: [c-nsp] Large prefix lists/sets on IOS-XR

netconf? On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 6:03 PM Sander Steffann via cisco-nsp < cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Hi, > > What is the best/most efficient/most convenient way to push large prefix > lists or sets to an XR router for BGP prefix filtering? Pushing thousands > of lines through the CLI

Re: [c-nsp] NTP network design considerations

. There are a few sources on the internet that I trust for time. It depends on your level of comfort. Aaron On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:43 PM harbor235 via cisco-nsp < cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > I hear what your saying but NTP is an active attack vector, I don't trust > outside resource

Re: [c-nsp] Link down affecting BGP peer

Are the sessions that bounced hashed to use the failed/turned off link? On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 12:07 PM Hank Nussbacher wrote: > I have 4 individual links defined as part of a Bundle-ether (IOS-XR > 5.3.3 on ASR9010): > > interface TenGigE0/2/0/1 > bundle id 2 mode active > flow-control

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR Vs. NTP in a duel to the death.

I typically use 3 external as servers and then have the core peer with themselves. I don't think that will help in this case but it does seem like something is borked. On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:42 AM Lukas Tribus wrote: > I don't think you will get anywhere without actually capturing the >

Re: [c-nsp] vs isis delay propagation of loopback interfec

+1 overload bit. On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:58 PM Saku Ytti wrote: > Hey, > > > Can someone help me out here? I'm trying to find a way to delay the > > propagation of a loopback interface in isis. > > > > The problem is the border node in sd-access, which uses the loopback > > interface for

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Break Into ROMMON

> > > >> Ya I tried that too, it still tries to find the wrong ios file and > start's > >> its loop again. This one might be a brick. > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:15 PM Aaron wrote: > >> > >> > Try this > >> >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Break Into ROMMON

Try this https://packetlife.net/blog/2010/oct/11/recovering-no-service-password-recovery-service/ On Thursday, December 3, 2020, Aaron wrote: > Looks like you need to talk to TAC. The password recovery being disabled > is not your friend. > > https://community.cisco.com/t5/rou

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Break Into ROMMON

Looks like you need to talk to TAC. The password recovery being disabled is not your friend. https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/asr-920-boot-fail/td-p/3834996 On Thursday, December 3, 2020, Scott Miller wrote: > The output didn't seem to format well, let's try it again: > > System

Re: [c-nsp] AAA on IOS-XR (NCS540)

This isn't at typo is it? aaa authentication login default group TACACS line! should it be aaa authentication login default group TACACS line <<< no ! On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 2:13 PM Eric Van Tol wrote: > No, all I have is: > > control-plane > management-plane > inband >interface

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k RSP440

6.6.x should work too. After that I think everything else is the 64bit. What is everyones opinion of the 64bit XR? On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:37 PM wrote: > Never ends :) > > -Aaron > > > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisc

Re: [c-nsp] Sanity check OSPF/BGP

You didn't specify the platform or code version it is running. Would help with platform specifics On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 11:47 AM wrote: > I wonder if bgp neighboring isn't timing out quickly enough for your > satisfaction and holding routes for a few minutes > > > -Original Message- >

Re: [c-nsp] EOBC0/0 ifInErrors

you could deduce if it is a line card or by adding 1 line card at a time. On Wednesday, September 30, 2020, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Aaron wrote on 30/09/2020 20:11: > >> He is suggesting reseating all cards. Starting with the Supervisor. >> > > correct. power down the b

Re: [c-nsp] EOBC0/0 ifInErrors

You may need to ask TAC. Unfortunately I do not know. He is suggesting reseating all cards. Starting with the Supervisor. On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:14 AM Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 30.09.2020 19:03, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > > Eugene Grosbein wrote on 30/09/2020 05:14: > >> Yesterday I've

Re: [c-nsp] EOBC0/0 ifInErrors

sharp increase recently (weekly, daily, hourly). I'd be more concerned with daily and hourly (or less). How frequently do you see them and what is the amount? On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:41 AM Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 29.09.2020 18:56, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > > Eugene Grosbein wrote on

Re: [c-nsp] Mass-renaming interfaces

Unfortunately no. On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:50 AM Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 28.09.2020 17:12, James Bensley wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:35, Eugene Grosbein > wrote: > >> One of my 7201 routers has four GigabitEthernet interfaces but uses > only two, > >> one for IP uplink and another

Re: [c-nsp] Help Cisco IOS XR 9001

CPP is the other issue. ex control-plane management-plane inband interface hundred-gige0/1/1 allow SSH allow blah On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:51 PM Ted Pelas Johansson wrote: > Regarding isis, it looks like you have MTU mismatch since you configured > 1600 byte on both platforms. >

Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

g > > set interfaces xe-0/1/4 gigether-options speed 1g > > agould@dallas-204-1> show interfaces xe-0/1/4 | grep speed > Link-level type: Flexible-Ethernet, MTU: 9216, MRU: 9224, LAN-PHY mode, > Speed: 10Gbps, BPDU Error: None, > Speed Configuration: 1G > > -aaron >

Re: [c-nsp] Question about 9410R interface naming

Good Morning Drew, They are TenGigabitethernet Interfaces: PortNameStatus VlanDuplex Speed Type Te10/0/44 connected xxx a-full a-1000 100/1000/2.5G/5G/10GBaseTX Have a good day, Aaron Aaron Childs   Director Infrastructure Services

Re: [c-nsp] Core - distrubution

use ipv6 On Wednesday, September 9, 2020, harbor235 wrote: > How are you IP'ng your connector networks between core and distribution? > Public space or private? I do not like the potential overlap with > management networks and I cannot DNS mike connector networks making my > traceroutes look

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading NXOS

aver > Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 1:58 PM > To: 'Aaron' > Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading NXOS > > Howdy and thanks for replying. > > So the switch is running 7.0(3)I1(3) > According to docs: > > Upgrading from Cisco NX-OS

Re: [c-nsp] Upgrading NXOS

Check to see if you have to upgrade to an intermediate version first. There was an issue that would brick the switch if you tried to go straight to the latest version. On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:54 AM Drew Weaver wrote: > Hello, > > Current version: 7.0(3)I1(3) > > Upgrading a 9508: > > Checked

[c-nsp] GLC-T on 9500-32C - 17.x IOS-XE

. Thanks in advance, Aaron 1. https://tmgmatrix.cisco.com/?npid=193 ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Maximum Prefix limit on Edge routers

Absolutely. Make sure to add enough overhead, 25%, so you do not keep getting warning messages in the logs. These are the defaults for XR To prevent a peer from flooding BGP with advertisements, a limit is placed on the number of prefixes that are accepted from a peer for each supported address

Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license

I'm gonna hate when Flash is EOL. We have servers that use that GUI thing. I agree, I hate it too. I don't want to throw out a decent server just because flash no longer works. I hope Adobe don't have a programmed kill switch. On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:21 PM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 21/Jul/20

Re: [c-nsp] Rehosting a perpetual CSR1000V license

ethernet console should be on the list. On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:01 PM joe mcguckin wrote: > We don’t buy anything that can’t be managed with a serial connection. That > means no fancy web based guis. Licensing is in the same category… A piece > of equipment has to do something extraordinary

Re: [c-nsp] TE FRR vs PATH OPTION PROTECTION

Ive done FRR with success. On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 8:20 AM emmanuel manoni wrote: > Hi experts, > > I'm trying to deploy MPLS TE tunnel protection method with as minimal > switchover time as possible, which one between TE FRR and Path Option > should I choose and why?If I deploy both of

Re: [c-nsp] IOS-XR IS-IS authentication

I believe the OP was about interop between cisco and juniper using key-chains. On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:56 AM Phil Bedard wrote: > There shouldn't be an issue using keychains for these functions, I have XR > and XE devices running IS-IS between each other with keychains on both > without an

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9001 BGP scaling and memory shortage

eXR is Linux based 64 bit vs classic XR which is the 32 bit qnx kernel. Some releases have both On Wednesday, May 20, 2020, Drew Weaver wrote: > Slightly unrelated to this thread but also sort of related. > > Did anyone else notice that this file appears in the ASR9001 IOS XR file > list now? >

Re: [c-nsp] RSVP-TE (MPLS-TE) and LDP question

Thanks James for the confirmation as that's precisely what I'm seeing. Would be nice to see a link to a cisco document or someone out there online that speaks to this -Aaron -Original Message- From: James Jun [mailto:ja...@towardex.com] Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 3:26 PM To: Aaron

[c-nsp] RSVP-TE (MPLS-TE) and LDP question

thermore, I think since I have that ldp config in my PE's, I have LFIB "Unlabelled" entries in my PE, I guess since I have no LDP config in the transit P nodes. But in XE since I can remove that ldp config I no longer have Unlabelled lfib entries and a nice clean lfib with only

[c-nsp] virtual routers - L2-type vpn's

: (PID=4352) : -Traceback= 5f9054 5fb5d8 605062 6fe214 538d69 565efc 567d65 688000 68a 9fc 68adf8 43c59a 7f6122(TRUNCATED) -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ONS15454 MSPP controller upgrades

have you looked at the ncs software/docs On Saturday, April 18, 2020, Curtis Piehler wrote: > Is there any good documentation online of upgrading the software on the > ONS15454 platform? (MSPP, not MSTP). I know this platform is way end of > life but unfortunately optical MUX's will just run

Re: [c-nsp] [External] SDx open standard?

of approval -Professional - like MEF-CECP, etc, people can get career certifications I recall they started with MEF, then MEF 2.0, now MEF 3.0 https://www.mef.net/certification/mef-certification-programs -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] [External] SDx open standard?

Perhaps that, and also, I think they may be substituting that term "mef" for "ce" more recently. perhaps to imply that its capabilities are now beyond the "metro" and extend into "carrier" space and beyond. Trying to make some educated guesses/recol

Re: [c-nsp] [External Email] Re: big uptime - what you got ?

I'm sure there is a 2511 somewhere that beats all of these. On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 2:35 PM wrote: > >> cisco LS1010 (R4600) processor with 65536K bytes of memory. > > > > It was just matter of time until someone shows up with LS1010 :) > > > > (Un)fortunately our LS1010s are long gone but the

Re: [c-nsp] [External Email] Re: big uptime - what you got ?

Oh my gosh a friggin lightstream 1010 up almost 17 years! That's about as long as atm has been dead. Lol You gotta tell me for reals if you still have cells going through that box ? -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alex

Re: [c-nsp] big uptime - what you got ?

Ha, wow, Sascha holds first place ! ...uptime is 14 years, 48 weeks, 4 days, 22 hours, 18 minutes My gosh, up since 2005 ! -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] big uptime - what you got ?

Non-believers I say, non-believers, lol Jk, thanks, hey could be a bug, doubt it though -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] big uptime - what you got ?

What, and have to reset that uptime counter, never! Lol Dude it's bridging eth frames just fine, why would i -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

[c-nsp] big uptime - what you got ?

Holy cow! Beat that dsw2-4503#sh ver | in uptime dsw2-4503 uptime is 11 years, 2 weeks, 1 day, 23 hours, 3 minutes dsw2-4503#sh ver | in IOS Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(31)SGA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3) -Aaron

[c-nsp] question with adj-rib-out and policy engine order and show commands

0 123 ? Total number of prefixes 1 r2# r2#sh ip ro bgp 10.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets B 10.0.2.1 [20/17] via 1.2.3.1, 09:40:38 -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/

Re: [c-nsp] show isis neighbors - system id shown

Thanks y'all -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] show isis neighbors - system id shown

1.2.3.1 UP21 r2.01 r1 L2 Fa0/0 1.2.3.1 UP22 r2.01 r2# -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.

Re: [c-nsp] Central Services Topology - Design question

Ah, and don't forget "additive" as it was crucial in not removing an rt, but rather, adding another rt to the already present rt. A nice way of having multiple extend community attributes (rt's) to be able to match on. -Aaron ___ cisco-n

Re: [c-nsp] Central Services Topology - Design question

had to use an auto-export command in juniper to allow that local route sharing. -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] new ASR9901 ios update problem

Btw, good job, and thanks Jürgen for the informative and detailed instruction on XR upgrade. -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 10:23 AM To: c...@marenda.net; cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] new ASR9901 ios update problem

You just gave me another reason to like Juniper :| -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] new ASR9901 ios update problem

It got jumbled ... I'll try again... admin install add disk1:asr9k-mgbl-px.pie-4.3.4 disk1:asr9k-mpls-px.pie-4.3.4 disk1:asr9k-mini-px.pie-4.3.4 disk1:asr9k-fpd-px.pie-4.3.4 synchronous admin install activate disk0:asr9k-mgbl-px-4.3.4 disk0:asr9k-mpls-px-4.3.4 disk0:asr9k-mini-px-4.3.4

Re: [c-nsp] new ASR9901 ios update problem

the files into disk1 and executed install from that location I had issues with a clock and also fpd, simply set the clock to something like 2009 and add that fpd pie. That's what I did, worked. - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X + SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 (10gb)

clean the fiber. On Thursday, September 5, 2019, Sheremet Roman wrote: > Hi, > > Yep we change card to brand new and update our IOS, now looks best > now: > > ASR1002#sh platform | in 10G > 0/3 SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 ok1w0d > > But we have one more problem, media

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 and EEM:Mandatory.dualrate_eem.tcl

..@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > > Jared Mauch > > Sent: lunedì 26 agosto 2019 15:10 > > To: Aaron > > Cc: Gert Doering; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 and EEM:Mandatory.dualrate_eem.tcl > > > > I’ll say this in public (n

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 and EEM:Mandatory.dualrate_eem.tcl

Any unexpected config change should be an automatic tac case. Totally unexpected. Reminds me of the days when swapping a flash card on a gsr could crash it. This is a new one . On Monday, August 26, 2019, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > does anyone know what "EEM:Mandatory.dualrate_eem.tcl" is? >

Re: [c-nsp] Inter-VRF with NAT

We have lots of zyxel's and manage all them with their public address. Why don't you just do that? -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2019 3:14 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c

Re: [c-nsp] netconf-yang feature candidate-datastore

The XML requirement doesn't sound odd since this is netconf/yang we are talking about. On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:42 AM Saku Ytti wrote: > Hey Adam, > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 17:08, wrote: > > > Was just wondering why I can't configure "netconf-yang feature > > candidate-datastore" on csr1k? >

Re: [c-nsp] ASR1002-X + SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 (10gb)

has this card worked in a different chassis? i suspect a bad card On Thursday, July 25, 2019, Andrew K. wrote: > I have this same issue with this same behavior. A reboot was also required > to get it to detect. The kicker is we have one of these cards in the > chassis working already. TAC

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 Replacement

27 14:20:55.287 CDT Cisco IOS XR Software, Version 4.1.2[Default] c-9k uptime is 5 years, 21 weeks, 4 days, 44 minutes -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at ht

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (eve-ng)

XRv9k -aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (eve-ng)

Is that XRv or XRv9K? XRv was great as it didn't require as many resources. On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:28 AM Aaron Gould wrote: > Have you all been able to use EVE-NG ? My gosh, what an awesome emulator. > > > > I have eve-ng running… > > > > XRv > > vMX &g

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (eve-ng)

began working with Junos a few years ago, and wow, it seemed to take routing os to a whole other level than XR did… again, this could be in my head, but curious what others think, IF, you have actually done enough work on both platforms to know enough to speak to it. -Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] A9K-VSM-500

d 5.2.0: MTU is 1514 (not configurable) in 5.2.2: ServiceApp interface will be set by default to Jumbo frame size (not configurable) CSCuo63064 https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo63064 -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net htt

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS ping utility reports lower RTT than possible

The initial is most likely due to arp. Depending how long it is between runs, the arp cache may clear. On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:57 AM Octavio Alvarez wrote: > On 5/3/19 5:14 AM, Martin T wrote: > > Hi Octavio, > > > > instead of a two-card laptop I used the available ports in server > > named

[c-nsp] ME3600 - ping drop seen

) !! !! !! Is there somewhere I could've seen these drops in a counter somewhere? Or a way to enable/disable that behavior? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol

The only place I run bgp on pe-ce is for internet uplinks… (junos) I use a few options to make it work… - peer-as 123 - local-as 456 - local-as private - local-as no-prepend-global-as That works for me. -Aaron From: Nathan Lannine [mailto:nathan.lann...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March

Re: [c-nsp] IS-IS as PE-CE protocol

Which reminds me... I recall if pe-ce is bgp, then redis into l3vpn is natural and automatic true ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] UDP/0 ACL IOSXR issue?

and 53 and 123 - Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bryan Holloway Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 1:38 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] UDP/0 ACL IOSXR issue? Anyone aware of any issues

Re: [c-nsp] segment routing/evpn on ASR920

Ummm, that too. LOL -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Bensley Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:05 AM To: Tom Ammon; Cisco-nsp List Subject: Re: [c-nsp] segment routing/evpn on ASR920 On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 02:36

Re: [c-nsp] segment routing/evpn on ASR920

docs/support for EVPN-MPLS in your desire to see if EVPN will work over SR? I could be way off. -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 99xx IOS-XR images are all EoL/EoS?

we are running 6.4.2 in classic xr. no confidence with 64 bit at the moment. need to see testing results from cisco first On Thursday, December 20, 2018, Charles Spurgeon < c.spurg...@austin.utexas.edu> wrote: > * Tom Hill [2018-12-19 20:19:09 +]: > > > On 19/12/2018 19:59, Charles Spurgeon

Re: [c-nsp] Ipv6 address plan

Check out the white paper on terastream On Thursday, October 11, 2018, harbor235 wrote: > Gents, > > I have a green field IPv6 infrastructure that I am standing up, I plan on > allocating unique IPv6 net block ranges for infrastructure nets > (loopbacks/routerid, pt-to-pts), service delivery

Re: [c-nsp] Telemetry real life use cases

What are you all using for a telemetry collector ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] CMs security

My cable modem mgmt and mta (voice) ip's are on different subnet than CPE. And we have an ACL on the CMTS to not allow customer ip's to communicate with those cm ip's Aaron > On Jul 29, 2018, at 5:38 PM, ring...@mail.com wrote: > > Hi all, > > Wondering what do you guys

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (eve-ng)

username: xrv Enter secret: Use the 'configure' command to modify this configuration. User Access Verification Username: xrv Password: RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ios# I'm in now !! -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] XRv (eve-ng)

comes back and says "Failed authentication attempt by user '' from 'console'..." so i see this with xrv versions... 5.1.1 5.3.0 6.3.2 - Aaron Thu Jul 26 13:35:26 UTC 2018 (/proc/self/fd/9): XR control plane: 5120MB RAM Thu Jul 26 13:35:26 UTC 2018 (/proc/self/fd/9): XR packet memory:

[c-nsp] XRv (eve-ng)

-Aaron .. Section:idt offset:0x006c base:fed185bc Section:pgdir offset:0x0070 Page Directory d000: PAE System page at phys:00017000 user:fed15000 kern:fed17000 Starting next program at vfe0419f8 Unable to access "/dev/ser1" (2) Restricted Rights Legend cisco Systems

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's

and a very small MPLS network with core IGP area 1, ...well, area 1 continued to grow, and area 0 was eventually decommissioned, and know area 1 remains :) I guess I could work through maintenance windows and convert everything to area 0, but I don't feel motivated to do so Works fine Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's

OSPF (area 0.0.0.1) MPLS/LDP network for several years, I believe simplicity and only as much complexity as is required for the job Aaron > On Jul 19, 2018, at 2:32 PM, ring...@mail.com wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have some practical design questions. > > 1. Is there a bette

Re: [c-nsp] EVPN Book/paper recommendation

Maybe something here https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Tech-Cafe-Ask-the-Author-MPLS-in/EVPN-advantag e-over-L2VPN-VPLS/td-p/291810 http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033905.do https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/mpls-in-the/9781491905449/ch0 8.html -Aaron -Original Message

Re: [c-nsp] NAT logging ASR1k

You wanna see the juniper configs for your ASR1006? Not sure why we didn't use netflow. I guess because syslog worked and that's where the docs led me Aaron > On Jul 9, 2018, at 2:52 AM, Ring Bit wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > Could you post the nat configs? > >

Re: [c-nsp] NAT logging ASR1k

the syslogging to slow down significantly Aaron > On Jul 8, 2018, at 10:12 AM, ring...@mail.com wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > Have an ASR 1006 doing NAT translations, it is having around 300k+ and > wanted to ask for a recommendation about logging those NAT translations. > > T

Re: [c-nsp] XR on GNS3

I ever got to properly flow. I also would have to bounce interfaces using a batch file anytime I restarted gns3 or even if I added a new instance of XRv... so because of that, I would never reboot my windows vm that it was all contained inside and tried not to close gns3 app -Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] line con 0 as terminal server on Cat6500?

I've actually taken out a little 2600 just to act as a 1-port terminal server for this exact purpose (maybe you can even use an old 2500) Aaron > On May 18, 2018, at 6:00 AM, Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure if you can use a console port for connec

Re: [c-nsp] line con 0 as terminal server on Cat6500?

I'm not sure if you can use a console port for connecting to another router's console port , but you can use the auxiliary (aux) port to do that. I've done it many times Aaron > On May 18, 2018, at 1:55 AM, Patrick M. Hausen <hau...@punkt.de> wrote: > > Hi all, > > la

Re: [c-nsp] Multicast in VRF

I wonder if it gets pruned right after the first packet maybe you have to do some igmp config for the underlying vlan804 receiver segment's L2 interfaces I'm guessing as it's been a while since I did much with mcast -Aaron -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 3048 airflow configuration

bow and afr On Thursday, March 15, 2018, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On Mar 15, 2018, at 20:48, Garrett Skjelstad > wrote: > > > > port-side > > What do you call the other side? Starboard? > > (SCNR.) > > Grüße, Carsten > >

Re: [c-nsp] Multihomed OTV on CSR Lab - Mac Address Issue

completely taken up in the latest 20 million dollar US Navy atm-to-the-desktop project…. And also , we had no idea what he was talking about with mpls…. Then he erased those 4 letters and went back to talking about LECS, LES, BUS, LEC operations in LANE ELAN’s…. K LOL…. -Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] Multihomed OTV on CSR Lab - Mac Address Issue

As my teenage son would say. "bet" ! -Aaron -- Heck yeah, pair of cheapest asr920 at each end and PWs between the DCs and you're done. adam ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Multihomed OTV on CSR Lab - Mac Address Issue

networking madness is because of that point stated above, I would think that someone (vendors/standards bodies/companies) would/should be working really hard to make that server stuff work in different bcast domains (different subnets)...so we wouldn't have to do all that L2 stuff -Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] Multihomed OTV on CSR Lab - Mac Address Issue

Ha, thanks Justin, I just read the answer to my question I just posted... OTV is cisco proprietary. Is OTV gaining steam in the industry as a potential ietf standard ? Interesting things you mention about assigning asics, and linecard dependancies... -Aaron

Re: [c-nsp] Multihomed OTV on CSR Lab - Mac Address Issue

Thanks, so is OTV cisco proprietary ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Multihomed OTV on CSR Lab - Mac Address Issue

er traffic with same knobs used in bgp-ip-routes. ? I thought with evpn, you could have active-active multi-homed forwarding across 2 ports, 2 CE's. ? -Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] Multihomed OTV on CSR Lab - Mac Address Issue

-mpls clouds ?...maybe these are things that would push me/others in one direction or the other when choosing a l2-emulation mechanism for DC or whatever we need it for. - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] ip vrf autoclassify source - loss of connectivity to hosts

What is this syntax ? Is this an IOS command ? "Cisco-AVpair = "ip:vrf-id=VRF1" - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 ospf %100 cpu blowup

ospf neighbors won't come up either with different mtu's -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Monday, January 15, 2018 8:00 AM To: Aaron Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600 ospf %100 cpu blowup

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 ospf %100 cpu blowup

I had something similar happen to me a couple months ago, and posted it here... [c-nsp] ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have https://www.mail-archive.com/cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net/msg65794.html - Aaron ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 ospf %100 cpu blowup

Size of the ospf table On Sunday, January 14, 2018, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 13/Jan/18 18:33, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > > > Hmm could it be that you hit the mtu limit of your links (which is not > 9216 > > but just 9000)? > > That would make sense - but if

Re: [c-nsp] ip vrf autoclassify source - loss of connectivity to hosts

This "ip vrf autoclassify source" feature looks to be a very nice auto-pbr solution for allowing multiple vrf's on one interface! I'd like to know if anyone has used it, particularly in the cable modem world...on Cisco uBR7246VXR, uBR10k, cbr

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 ospf %100 cpu blowup

-Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >