Re: [c-nsp] CSCuy29638 - MPLS (for IPv4) Brokenness Fixed - ASR920

--- Begin Message --- > On Aug 6, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > On 5 Aug 2016, at 11:02, Saku Ytti wrote: >> I disappointed Cisco does not mention CoPP at all. > > Or running ntp in a vrf, although that didn't stop problems with the last bad > ntp

Re: [c-nsp] Tabo Topic? Third party Maintenance

--- Begin Message --- > On Jan 23, 2017, at 3:05 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 02:28:37PM -0500, Shawn L wrote: >> I guess it all depends on what you utilize support for. We tend to have >> in-house spares, etc. that we can swap in in the event of a

[c-nsp] OT: CCO - clusterf*** or dumpster fire?

--- Begin Message --- I have no words for the idiocy I’m encountering with just trying to download software. I suspect that I could probably accomplish this with less effort by calling in and using the “security flaw” exception. I’m a small customer, I don’t ask much, I pay what seems like a

Re: [c-nsp] Ode to the old days

--- Begin Message --- > On Dec 8, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > Gert Doering wrote: >> And vendors that actually cared what their users asked for (at least >> if you offered some money as bait). And understood protocol specs. > > URTROLL > > I still, ironically,

[c-nsp] OT: support services

--- Begin Message --- Hi all, This is 100% cisco-specific, but not technical. I’m finding lots of vendors offering their own version of support programs, many of which are competitively-priced and backed with really well-stocked part bins. Of course they cannot offer software. We’ve had one

Re: [c-nsp] OT: support services

les Sprickman via cisco-nsp > <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is 100% cisco-specific, but not technical. > > I’m finding lots of vendors offering their own version of support programs, > many of which are competitively-priced and backed with

Re: [c-nsp] Outdoor switch

--- Begin Message --- > On Oct 19, 2017, at 1:49 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > > Take a look at the UBNT Edgepoint gear as well. Fairly cool, comes in 10G/1G > speed varieties with both routed and switched options. Just be very careful with fencing UBNT gear off from

Re: [c-nsp] 3850 / 3650 storm control

--- Begin Message --- Just chiming in with a quick question... > On Nov 22, 2017, at 1:25 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > Hey Scott, > > In edge links, you can limit multicast and broadcast very severely. > There is very little point to limit unicast even in edge links, unless > you

Re: [c-nsp] Outdoor switch

--- Begin Message --- These guys dominate in the WISP market and make great hardware. Support is excellent. We have around 4 of them up on roofs in NYC, they take the weather quite well as long as you get the recommended enclosure. They take PoE in and can provide PoE out - all “passive” PoE

Re: [c-nsp] Mobile plant roaming speeds

--- Begin Message --- This is dated (I don’t think Apple is the only one supporting this in clients anymore), but 802.11k exists to give the client information about the other APs in a network - I’d suspect any client supporting this would be less “sticky”:

Re: [c-nsp] Internet speed

--- Begin Message --- > On Aug 14, 2018, at 3:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 13/Aug/18 19:43, Jon Wolberg wrote: > >> There was a very similar discussion on NANOG last month about the same >> topic. You can read the thread here: >> >>

Re: [c-nsp] Console connections

--- Begin Message --- > On Jan 31, 2019, at 5:27 PM, Hunter Fuller wrote: > > We are trying a somewhat-radical new strategy. For our newest rack, we > bought a Raspberry Pi Model 3B. It has four USB ports, and into each port > we plugged a dual-headed USB to RS232 adapter, for a total of 8

Re: [c-nsp] How secure ASR management interface is?

--- Begin Message --- > On Apr 20, 2019, at 9:49 AM, Alex K. wrote: > > Hello Dave, > > Thank you. > > Sure, it isn't *really* separated. After all, RPs' CPU connected to both > (management interface and router forwarding matrix). It's really software > imposed separation. I’m always a bit

Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE and HTTP Redirect

--- Begin Message --- > On Oct 3, 2020, at 2:59 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > 03.10.2020 12:52, Scott Miller wrote: > >> Hello all, I’m looking for some recommendations. I have a customer, an >> ISP, who is doing PPPoE for residential and “some” smaller business >> accounts. PPPoE

Re: [c-nsp] Delay in delivery of new routers

--- Begin Message --- The NSA is behind in designing the new backdoor. /s > On Dec 15, 2020, at 3:34 AM, h...@interall.co.il wrote: > > We ordered 8 new ASR1009x at the end of July. > > Original delivery date was mid-September. Then pushed to October, then > pushed to November, then to Dec

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 1000 series replacement

> On Dec 16, 2023, at 4:16 AM, Dragan Jovicic via cisco-nsp > wrote: > > Greeting, > We have a somewhat unusual scenario with thousands of CPE devices each > using cellular interface and gre tunnel to connect to hub router, currently > ASR 1001x. > The hub router deploys NHRP map multicast