Re: [c-nsp] 4500X help

I agree, in my 4500X deploys I haven't noticed a difference. Only thing would be VSS setup if you are planning on doing stacking. From my understanding Cisco has made it easier in later IOS releases. Steve -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]

Re: [c-nsp] Inline Fan Controllers?

I have used those before, it should decrease the voltage, forcing the fan spin slower. It should work in theory on any device using a 3pin connector. Possibly a defective or junky fan controller. You could put a volt meter on the end of it to see if turning the knob has any affect. Stephen

Re: [c-nsp] Inline Fan Controllers?

: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 10:54 AM To: Steve Mikulasik Cc: cisco-nsp@pu ck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Inline Fan Controllers? I had 2 of the same exact fan controllers both do the same thing so I'm counting out that both are defective but guessing that most likely theres something they arent

Re: [c-nsp] Slightly off-topic - Network Monitoring software

Anyone ever try Nedi? http://www.nedi.ch/ Stephen Mikulasik ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Question for TAC

I have noticed this as well. Maybe Cisco should develop a system where people going on vacation in 1-2 weeks don't get certain types of tickets. Stephen Mikulasik -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol Sent: Thursday,

[c-nsp] NATPort block alloc fail

refcount 43926 nat-limit statistics: max entry: max allowed 50, used 43979, missed 0 In-to-out drops: 498115 Out-to-in drops: 584950318 Pool stats drop: 0 Mapping stats drop: 0 Port block alloc fail: 41366 IP alias add fail: 0 Limit entry add fail: 0 Steve Mikulasik

[c-nsp] DAI Scale

I have some 2960+ running WAPs. Each 2960 will probably have 100-200 clients at peak (low bandwidth use) and I am thinking of turning on DAI on each 2960. I don't know how DAI functions on the hardware, so how well does it scale up on this platform? Will I run into issues doing this on 2960

Re: [c-nsp] Mixing 2960S and X in stack

And here I was thinking about adding a 2960X to 2960S stack. Thanks for helping me dodge a bullet! It is the simple stuff that is the hardest. Stephen Mikulasik -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alan Buxey Sent: Sunday, May 31,

[c-nsp] Cisco 3850 Stable Release

What is the most stable release for the 3850 platform? The TAC recommended 3.3.5SE is total trash. Has a wonderful bug when you write mem the switch stack reloads. https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCur26193/?referring_site=bugquickviewredir Stephen Mikulasik

[c-nsp] 3850 DHCP Database Locked

Anyone ever received the error % The DHCP database could not be locked. Please retry the command later. It pops up when doing any sort of show dhcp command. I can find reference to it as a bug for 7206, but can't seem to find anything for 3850. I am running 3.03.05SE. Figured I would try this

Re: [c-nsp] CRC errors on multiple ports of WS-C2950T-48-SI switch

When it boots up check to see if the switch passes the startup tests. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Martin T Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 9:15 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] CRC errors on multiple ports

Re: [c-nsp] 4500X Roadmap

: Monday, October 19, 2015 2:55 PM To: Steve Mikulasik <steve.mikula...@civeo.com>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: 4500X Roadmap We run some 4500X's, but were told by our Cisco AM last year that it(4500X platform) is not seen as a "long term" propositionpot

Re: [c-nsp] 4500X Roadmap

, Steve Mikulasik wrote: > L3 is needed as well. L2TP support is a big plus too. Would the 6840-X not make a better fit? I can't see reference to the 4500-X doing L2TP at all. (L2PT, yes, but that's *totally* different.) -- Tom ___ cisco-nsp mailing l

Re: [c-nsp] 4500X Roadmap

L3 is needed as well. L2TP support is a big plus too. -Original Message- From: CiscoNSP List [mailto:cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 3:03 PM To: Steve Mikulasik <steve.mikula...@civeo.com>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: 4500X Roadmap Do yo

[c-nsp] 4500X Roadmap

The 3850 recently got updated to have models that support 40Ggbe uplinks. Is there any word on the street about the 4500X getting 40Gbe modules? Seems weird this switch does not have the capability, but the lower end unit does. ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco WS2960-X - Are these switches lemons or is there a stable release?

I think that was a bug in 15.0.2EX5. 15.0.2aEX5 has been working fine for me since it came out in Feb. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hagen AMEN Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:29 AM To: Nick Cutting

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco WS2960-X - Are these switches lemons or is there a stable release?

To: Steve Mikulasik <steve.mikula...@civeo.com> Cc: Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.co.uk>; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco WS2960-X - Are these switches lemons or is there a stable release? Certainly, we saw the issue happen running 15.0(2)EX5, but we've also seen it happ

Re: [c-nsp] CSRv & VXLAN

, at 12:56 PM, Steve Mikulasik <steve.mikula...@civeo.com> > wrote: > > Anyone have any experience with VXLAN on the CSRv? I need to span L2 traffic > across hosted datacetners (can't use a physical device unless it installs on > x86 hardware) and was wondering if this

[c-nsp] CSRv & VXLAN

Anyone have any experience with VXLAN on the CSRv? I need to span L2 traffic across hosted datacetners (can't use a physical device unless it installs on x86 hardware) and was wondering if this is the way to go on this platform. ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] CSRv & VXLAN

15 at 2:22 PM, Mohammad Khalil > <eng_m...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi > > I have simulated this on gns3 > > http://eng-mssk.blogspot.com/2015/09/otv-example.html?m=1 > > > > It might give you a hint > > > > BR, > > Mohammad > &

Re: [c-nsp] switch for SAN

The 3850 will perform better as it has larger buffers than the 3750X. 3850 is an upgrade in everyway. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 7:44 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] NCS-5001 - sweet...got one in the lab

In the future when kids are complaining that the multi Tbps wifi is slow we will tell them that back in our day we had 100Gbe and we liked it! -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 3:24 PM To:

Re: [c-nsp] Strange X2 Temperature Flaps

Are they 3rd party optics? Maybe you got a bad batch that had a fault temp diode. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert Williams Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:37 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Strange X2

[c-nsp] VRF IP Helper

I am trying to setup ip helper on a 3750G 12.2(55)SE10. The SVIs are on the "GUEST" vrf and the DHCP server is in global. With "ip helper-address global 1.1.1.14" set on the SVI the switch seems to be forwarding using the SVI's IP rather than an IP in global. This behavior is different on my

Re: [c-nsp] ISR4431-AX/K9

I believe NBAR 2 is in the AVX bundle, but there is normal NBAR support in the other bundles. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Greene Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:50 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] DHCP Snooping on Cat3850

I have had a lot of issues with DHCP snooping on the 3.7 train. Never got it to work, but since it wasn't necessary for the deploy I never got around to figuring it out. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Ode to the old days

Make sure you tell all the young techs "They don't make 'em like they used to!" -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mattias Gyllenvarg Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 4:46 AM To: cisco-nsp Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] Ode to the old days

That reminds me of this comic http://i.imgur.com/FEiAgxh.gif -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 2:36 PM To: Nick Cutting Cc: cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 3750 Stack Auto Upgrade

I have had issues using auto-upgrade on 3750 switches. The 16M of flash is pretty low and auto-upgrade can fail if there is a bunch of stuff on flash that isn't image related. The latest IOS is a lot larger than the image shipped on most 3750 switches, so storage is a lot tighter than what some

Re: [c-nsp] Has there been a Cisco network device with GE management port while other ports are FE or lower?

In my experience G0 is always a management interface. From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Martin T Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 10:27 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Has there been a Cisco network device with GE management port while other ports are FE or lower? Hi, I need

Re: [c-nsp] Experience with 9500-16X ?

--- Begin Message --- We run the 16x and 40X. I honestly wouldn't buy them again since the other 9500 models use the UADP 3.0 ASIC and have better buffers. The UADP 2.0 9500 switches split the 32MB buffer into two 16MB buffers per core, well the UADP 3.0 9500 switches have 36M shared between

Re: [c-nsp] NCS IOS-XR rant (was:Re: Internet border router recommendations and experiences)

Cisco's method for rolling out updates (basically stuck in the 90s) is becoming more and more of a liability. When evaluating vendors I have started to place high importance in how they handle updates as there is less and less tolerance for leaving anything in a unpatched state for very long.