So as far as I understand, the performance is not degraded, isn't it?
El mié, 20-02-2008 a las 09:30 -0500, Rodney Dunn escribió:
Philippe,
I need to check back with the BU on it. I thought they were putting
a document out on this G2 processing reporting issue.
Basically due to the way
That is what i did. :-)
El jue, 21-02-2008 a las 10:52 -0500, Christian Koch escribió:
make your own with that stencil - ungroup the object and piece a 12
port model together
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Ultramajestic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right, it should
You are right, it should be there but it isn't.
El mié, 20-02-2008 a las 08:39 -0500, Christian Koch escribió:
should be here
http://cisco.com/en/US/prod/assets/visio/product_visio_icon0900aecd80094d04.zip
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Ultramajestic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
For some reason, I can't do that, it is strange :-/
El mié, 06-02-2008 a las 08:25 -0500, Jason Lixfeld escribió:
You can just log in to it (the passive/standby node) directly and do a
show ver.
On 6-Feb-08, at 8:15 AM, ultramajestic wrote:
Hi, is there anyway to see the serial number
Hi,
I have here a 1841 with IOS:
My schema here is:
VPN3000 DSL Router (doing NAT) Windows Server PC as PPTP client
(NAT) LAN
Yeah, I know 2 boxes doing NAT, some ports and gre protocol forwarded to
the windows server... no commments :-P
Well, the plan is to replace the DSL router and the
Take a look to http://iptrack.sourceforge.net/ it is opensource.
El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 13:02 -0500, Paul Stewart escribió:
Hi folks...
I'm looking for a good IP Subnet tracking system - open source would be
wonderful but commercial is fine too...
Requirements:
IPV4 and IPV6 Address
FYI, I am using IPPlan.
We found some issues to deploy it but most of them were related to our
environment here, so at this momment it is being used with some
customization -related with some information we wanted to add to an IP-
and we don't find critical issues yet.
I suposse it would be a