On Thursday 07 January 2010 10:09:20 pm David Freedman
wrote:
When you add MPLS into the mix (for internet routing, not
just VPN) your border router becomes an LER and as such
you can't take advantage of the core routers and have
them MPLS only LSRs at the same time. One solution may
be
I know I'm replying to an email from the beginning of the thread, but...
I am trying to figure out if there is a
different/newer/better(?) way to announce our public IP
ranges to our Internet providers, currently we are declaring
our subnets in 'network statements' in the BGP
configuration,
Prior to MPLS We null routed *all* our supernets (public aggregated
announcements) on *all* core routers such that unknown traffic only made
it as far as the nearest core (of which there are at least two in each
PoP), of course if your ASN becomes partitioned then you have to be
prepared to deal
-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP - Announcing routes to Internet providers.
Drew, network statements are for the weak.:)
(I'm kidding of course) but there is a better way.
You should use community tagging in combination with prefix lists and
route
maps. The idea is that you announce routes according
: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP - Announcing routes to Internet providers.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:30:27AM +0100, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
And, BTW, I wish those of you that propose redistributing connected and
static routes into BGP a huge budget you'll need to upgrade RAM and TCAM of
your routers/switches when everyone decides (after reading this mailing list
Howdy,
I am trying to figure out if there is a different/newer/better(?) way to
announce our public IP ranges to our Internet providers, currently we are
declaring our subnets in 'network statements' in the BGP configuration, we have
static routes setup like ip route x.x.x.x 255.255.224.0
On Jan 4, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Howdy,
I am trying to figure out if there is a different/newer/better(?) way to
announce our public IP ranges to our Internet providers, currently we are
declaring our subnets in 'network statements' in the BGP configuration, we
have
, 2010 12:35 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] BGP - Announcing routes to Internet providers.
Howdy,
I am trying to figure out if there is a different/newer/better(?) way to
announce our public IP ranges to our Internet providers, currently we are
declaring our subnets in 'network statements' in the BGP
: Re: [c-nsp] BGP - Announcing routes to Internet providers.
Drew, network statements are for the weak.:)
(I'm kidding of course) but there is a better way.
You should use community tagging in combination with prefix lists and
route
maps. The idea is that you announce routes according to a tag
10 matches
Mail list logo
