The only reliable method we've found to mitigate OutDiscards on the ME36/3800
platform when coming from the 10G to the 1G interfaces has been to set a
queue-limit per class.
class-map match-all COS_ZERO
match cos 0
!
policy-map QUEUEFIX
class COS_ZERO
bandwidth 100
queue-limit 2000 us
Yes, ES+ cards are supported as long as you're running SXJ1
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/release/notes/features.html#wp4805501
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Did the management port get renumbered?
-Steve
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andrew K.
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 1:36 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600x - g0/25 ?!
I
On 4/28/15, 11:00 AM, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Cisco Catalyst 3750, it's possible to limit a max of MAC address per
vlan ?
i receive on a trunk 802.1k a lot of vlan.
On each vlan received, i want limit to 10 MAC address ;=)
a suggestion ?
Use port-security to
This seems like a good use case for VASI interfaces.
Thanks,
Steve
On 6/14/16, 3:22 PM, "cisco-nsp on behalf of Curtis Piehler"
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Quite the curious case here. An ASR9000 router has two VRFs.
>
>For simplicity
You will also want to pay close attention to which split horizon group the
pseudowire between the ASR and 6500 is assigned to. The ASR<->6500 PW
should be in a separate group from the full mesh PWs in the VFI as well as
the physical ACs to allow for traffic to flood appropriately.
Thanks,
Steve
REP frames are sent untagged to 0100.0ccc.ccce. Try adding encapsulation
untagged to your service instances.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:40 AM, Fernando Cardoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm trying to pass REP through a MPLS network. the two PE are me3600.
> The configuration:
>
> Me 3600
IIRC the EXP values for non-IP traffic are mapped directly from the .1p COS
values. Depending on your flavor of STP this field may not even exist, in
which case I suspect it is being treated as COS0. Is it possible to have
the downstream device push a .1q tag?
Cheers,
Steve
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018
--- Begin Message ---
For completeness sake, if there are a low number of S-VLANs for your use
case then an external loopback cable might suffice.
-Steve
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:02 AM James Bensley wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 18:14, wrote:
> >
> > > Cat6K and 6880 support QinQ.
> > > We