Hi everybody,
Have an ASR 1006 doing NAT translations, it is having around 300k+ and wanted
to ask for a recommendation about logging those NAT translations.
Tried it with a collector via Netflow v9 with the export command "ip nat log
translationsflow-export v9 udp destination" command the C
Hi all,
Is there a way of showing or knowing the NAT session per second current rate on
ASR1k?
According to its Datasheet it says it supports 200,000 sessions per second with
20G ESP.
On CLI the cmd "show ip nat trans tot" shows the active sessions only for both
TCP and UDP based.
Thanks,
To
Hi all,
I have some practical design questions.
1. Is there a better way of doing the HA than having adjacencies to the router
(can be 3 hops away) over two different VLANs and different OSPF cost over
trunk links with BFD enabled?
2. Do you find less practical a MPLS network on a multi-area d
Anyone else can give an opinion to those three questions?
Thanks.
T.
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 at 12:43 AM
> From: "Aaron Gould"
> To: "Nick Cutting"
> Cc: "ring...@mail.com" , "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net"
>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's
>
> I was waiting for that, lol
>
>
Hi all,
Wondering what do you guys prefer as best practice to block connectivity like
ping, http and everything else between CMs (docsis plant)?
How do you do and manage it?
ton
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether
Hi everyone,
I wanted to ask how do you guys handle the customer complains about slow
Internet speed? Today almost everyone takes the measurement from speedtest.net
and reports that as the speed their getting.
As far as how speedtest works is that is uses multiple TCP connections which is
not
Hi Mark,
Would like to get back to this with some more questions.
1. Imagine a ring topology with core switches each sw connected with dual 10G
links thus Port channel for increased capacity. The redundancy is achieved from
OSPF adjacency over two different VLANs with BFD enabled (first vlan go
Bump. Anyone?
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 at 10:47 PM
> From: ring...@mail.com
> To: "Mark Tinka"
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF+BGP and MPLS Q's
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Would like to get back to this with some more questions.
>
> 1. Imagine a ring topology with core s