Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Hi, On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:15:13PM -0400, Pete S. wrote: The biggest running issue I have with SXH, My biggest issues are: - no BFD on SVIs (worked fine in SXF) - the BGP ghost bug is back :-( (SXH3 regularily forgets to send withdraws to iBGP peers if a prefix completely disappears. During the course of 4 weeks, I have observed it twice, once for IPv4 and once for IPv6, without actually *looking* for it - so it's likely happening much more often) The thing I like most about SXH is the reworked mls netflow architecture where you only fill up netflow TCAM for those interfaces that you really want to see, and not for all interfaces and the collector has to filter. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax: +49-89-35655025[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpI3EQyIL3cA.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:15:13PM -0400, Pete S. wrote: The biggest running issue I have with SXH, My biggest issues are: - no BFD on SVIs (worked fine in SXF) - the BGP ghost bug is back :-( (SXH3 regularily forgets to send withdraws to iBGP peers if a prefix completely disappears. During the course of 4 weeks, I have observed it twice, once for IPv4 and once for IPv6, without actually *looking* for it - so it's likely happening much more often) Yes, the nasty BGP bug is present. The only solution seems to be a periodically clear ip bgp all. Cisco IOS Software, s6523_rp Software (s6523_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SXH3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) -- Best regards, Adrian Minta ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Hi, On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:02:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote: - the BGP ghost bug is back :-( Yes, the nasty BGP bug is present. The only solution seems to be a periodically clear ip bgp all. Cisco IOS Software, s6523_rp Software (s6523_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SXH3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Gah. For me, clear ip bgp soft * seems also to have helped, but still, this is no way to run an ISP... Do you have a bug ID or a TAC case # for this? (I currently can't open cases for the boxes in question, as our gold partner is unable to get the contracts sorted out, but soon!). gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax: +49-89-35655025[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpiKJAvLV9ZX.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:02:08PM +0300, Adrian Minta wrote: - the BGP ghost bug is back :-( Yes, the nasty BGP bug is present. The only solution seems to be a periodically clear ip bgp all. Cisco IOS Software, s6523_rp Software (s6523_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SXH3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Gah. For me, clear ip bgp soft * seems also to have helped, but still, this is no way to run an ISP... Do you have a bug ID or a TAC case # for this? (I currently can't open cases for the boxes in question, as our gold partner is unable to get the contracts sorted out, but soon!). gert Not yet. Until today I considered this an isolated incident. Next time when the bug will strike I will for sure. -- Best regards, Adrian Minta ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Lastest one running SXH1. No problems so far with FWSM, ACE and 6748s. we've got a 12.2(33)SXH3 box up and alive now - so far so much better than SXH2 (and 2b) but we've yet to drive packets through in anger. certainly looks like we might be SXH'd by the new year (but dont quote me on that! ;-) ) Just don't try and scp anything from it... ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Hi, we've got a 12.2(33)SXH3 box up and alive now - so far so much better than SXH2 (and 2b) but we've yet to drive packets through in anger. certainly looks like we might be SXH'd by the new year (but dont quote me on that! ;-) ) Just don't try and scp anything from it... 8-) dont worry - i saw _that_ posting. anything with SXH in the subject line right now gets my immediate attention (remember that spammers ;-) ) alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
We've been running a mix od SXF, and SXH (un)fortunately. SXF is pretty solid. If you don't have any features(like VPN, adjust-mss specifically), or modules which require an SXH train(i.e. 6716) I'd suggest you stick with safe harbor SXF. The biggest running issue I have with SXH, is not containing the ISSU capability in the non-modular flavor. Modular still makes me nervous for production. --Pete On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, we've got a 12.2(33)SXH3 box up and alive now - so far so much better than SXH2 (and 2b) but we've yet to drive packets through in anger. certainly looks like we might be SXH'd by the new year (but dont quote me on that! ;-) ) Just don't try and scp anything from it... 8-) dont worry - i saw _that_ posting. anything with SXH in the subject line right now gets my immediate attention (remember that spammers ;-) ) alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Hi, Lastest one running SXH1. No problems so far with FWSM, ACE and 6748s. we've got a 12.2(33)SXH3 box up and alive now - so far so much better than SXH2 (and 2b) but we've yet to drive packets through in anger. certainly looks like we might be SXH'd by the new year (but dont quote me on that! ;-) ) alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Lastest one running SXH1. No problems so far with FWSM, ACE and 6748s. tv - Original Message - From: Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Antonio Acuesta (DHL AU) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:09 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version Antonio Acuesta (DHL AU) wrote: Hi, Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513? The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3. The switch has not been upgraded for a while and it will be good to know the version with less bug. We're running 12.2(18)SXF10 without problems. I believe 12.2(18)SXF11 and SXF12a are sort of Safe Harbor qualified. I cannot recommend 12.2(33)SXH - we've had a lot of problems. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Hi, Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513? The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3. The switch has not been upgraded for a while and it will be good to know the version with less bug. Thanks. Tony ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Antonio Acuesta (DHL AU) wrote: Hi, Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513? The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3. The switch has not been upgraded for a while and it will be good to know the version with less bug. We're running 12.2(18)SXF10 without problems. I believe 12.2(18)SXF11 and SXF12a are sort of Safe Harbor qualified. I cannot recommend 12.2(33)SXH - we've had a lot of problems. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Antonio, Specifically for Catalyst 6500 and its different service modules, I suggest you take a look at http://www.cisco.com/go/safeharbor I strongly recommend reading through the documents, and not just the highlights... Arie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Antonio Acuesta (DHL AU) Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 16:21 PM To: cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version Hi, Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513? The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3. The switch has not been upgraded for a while and it will be good to know the version with less bug. Thanks. Tony ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version
Hi, On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:20:41PM +0800, Antonio Acuesta (DHL AU) wrote: Can you please recommend a stable IOS version for Cisco Catalyst 6513? The current version that I have is Version 12.2(18)SXD3. The switch has not been upgraded for a while and it will be good to know the version with less bug. We've been fairly happy with 12.2(18)SXF in various versions. Latest release is SXF14. Check the release notes on CCO whether your specific combination of hardware is still supported - some modules might have been dropped SXE-SXF. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax: +49-89-35655025[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp47DuVtDHyj.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
