On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 13:29 +, Nick Cutting wrote:
> In the output of show spanning tree - is the port with the untagged
> service instance forwarding on vlan 4093?
> Unless something changed from 16.6 -> 16.7 I imagine that it is only
> forwarding and processing BPDU's on vlans 2 and 10.
Corr
because BPDU's were not processed on
this VLan it may be bad.
NIck
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter
Rathlev
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 7:06 AM
To: Nick Cutting
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] span
For what it's worth I have working Rapid PVST+ on ARS 920 IOS 16.7.1
with the following configuration:
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
spanning-tree vlan 2,10,2302 priority 24576
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet0/0/25
description => Towards HP 5700FF
mtu 9216
no ip address
load-interval 30
servic
Doering ;
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree for local switching on ASR920
This message originates from outside of your organisation.
I actually just got this kind of working, but had to use MST.
Cisco IOS XE Software, Version 03.18.00.SP.156-2.SP-ext
I'm going to introduce a L2
8.22 P2p
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark
Tinka
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 5:04 PM
To: Nick Cutting ; Gert Doering ;
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree for local switching on ASR920
This message origi
On 12/Mar/18 22:21, Nick Cutting wrote:
> Sorry to drag this one up - Gert did you ever get a working config for this?
>
> I plan on using a pair of 920's with a layer 2 broadcast domain on the 12
> gigabit Ethernet ports, and using the 10g ports to connect to separate
> carriers, bust also us
Behalf Of Gert
Doering
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 2:46 AM
To: Peter Rathlev
Cc: Gert Doering ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] spanning-tree for local switching on ASR920
This Message originated outside your organization.
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 06:05:47AM +0200, Pet
I believe you should use "l2protocol forward/tunnel stp" instead of
"l2protocol peer stp" under si 10, assuming FWs run STP (?) and it's
untagged.
But another questions comes to my mind: are the two FWs L2 connected by
some other media too, besides through the ASR920?
--
Tassos
Gert Doering wro
Hi,
> From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 10:15 AM
>
> Hi,
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, adamv0...@netconsultings.com
> wrote:
> > Hmm and if you enable debug can you actually see the stp packets being
> > issued (or even received) on e
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:45:08AM +0100, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
> Hmm and if you enable debug can you actually see the stp packets being
> issued (or even received) on either of the ports?
> The config looks good for catching and processing such PDUs.
It's not sending PDUs, so
On 19/Oct/17 10:48, James Bensley wrote:
> We wouldn't offer dual connections to the same layer 3 edge device as
> a "resilient" service nor have it participate in layer 2 service if it
> is layer 3 edge. I'd stick a switch in place, the FW could have two
> links to the switch and the switch can
On 19 October 2017 at 09:38, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 19/Oct/17 10:24, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> So, how do you bridge together two ports on an ASR1k, with STP? ;-)
>
> I do understand the bits about no global VLAN significance, etc.,
> and tieing bridge-groups to pseudowires, etc. - I just want t
Hmm and if you enable debug can you actually see the stp packets being
issued (or even received) on either of the ports?
The config looks good for catching and processing such PDUs.
Btw I'm still not getting the setup, so you have FW1 in port 1 and FW2 in
port 2 and p1 and p2 are in BD1.
Now how
On 19/Oct/17 10:24, Gert Doering wrote:
> So, how do you bridge together two ports on an ASR1k, with STP? ;-)
>
> I do understand the bits about no global VLAN significance, etc.,
> and tieing bridge-groups to pseudowires, etc. - I just want the more
> basic stuff to be more explosion-robust wh
Hello Gert,
2017-10-18 15:39 GMT+02:00 Gert Doering :
> IOS is asr920-universalk9_npe.03.18.03.S.156-2.S3-std.bin
Well PVST+/RPVST+ is a fancy feature on this platform, and for fancy
features you need fancy releases :)
16.6.1 in this case:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr920/re
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:19:22AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Treat more like an ASR1000 router, and you'll be just fine.
So, how do you bridge together two ports on an ASR1k, with STP? ;-)
I do understand the bits about no global VLAN significance, etc.,
and tieing bridge-groups to pseudow
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:08:31AM +0100, James Bensley wrote:
> Open a TAC case, they'll probably tell you STP isn't supported and the
> documentation is infact wrong, that is what has happened for me
> recently with some ASR920s and ME3600s with a different feature than
> STP :D
That is pro
On 19/Oct/17 10:08, James Bensley wrote:
> Open a TAC case, they'll probably tell you STP isn't supported and the
> documentation is infact wrong, that is what has happened for me
> recently with some ASR920s and ME3600s with a different feature than
> STP :D
I think the presence of any such com
On 19/Oct/17 09:46, Gert Doering wrote:
> I wasn't particularily asking for suggestions, but for "I have this
> working, and this is how it looks like".
>
> This box is unlike any other Cisco "switch-like thing" I've had in my
> hands before, so it might very well be just not supported at al
On 19 October 2017 at 08:46, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:21:27AM +0100, James Bensley wrote:
>> >> Then configure STP for VLAN "10". It doesn't seem like there is any way
>> >> to map to an arbitrary PVST instance, VLAN ID and bridge domain ID has
>> >> to match.
>>
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:21:27AM +0100, James Bensley wrote:
> >> Then configure STP for VLAN "10". It doesn't seem like there is any way
> >> to map to an arbitrary PVST instance, VLAN ID and bridge domain ID has
> >> to match.
>
> I don't know the answer to you question but Peter's sugges
On 19 October 2017 at 07:46, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 06:05:47AM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 15:39 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>> > I have an ASR920 that is supposed to have gi0/0/10 and gi0/0/11 in
>> > the same bridge group, with a routed IP:
>> >
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 06:05:47AM +0200, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 15:39 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > I have an ASR920 that is supposed to have gi0/0/10 and gi0/0/11 in
> > the same bridge group, with a routed IP:
> >
> > interface GigabitEthernet0/0/10
> > no ip addres
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 15:39 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> I have an ASR920 that is supposed to have gi0/0/10 and gi0/0/11 in
> the same bridge group, with a routed IP:
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/0/10
> no ip address
> media-type auto-select
> negotiation auto
> cdp enable
> service instanc
24 matches
Mail list logo
