Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought cube-ha was missing from
the code on these? same as the ASR's since they are all running
ios-xe.
I have not tested it myself, just doing a lot of reading in
preparation of deploying these.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Ryan Huff
to suggest that L2 box to box is possible on the 4451.
Are you saying it is not?
Thanks,
Ryan
From: wo...@justfamily.org
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:59:34 -0600
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question
To: ryanh...@outlook.com
CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Please correct me if I'm wrong
expectation for failover seem just as reasonable.
Thanks,
Ryan
From: wo...@justfamily.org
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:17:45 -0600
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question
To: ryanh...@outlook.com
CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Per this:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice
/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-overview.html
Thanks,
Ryan
From: avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:49:26 +
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question
To: ryanh...@outlook.com; wo...@justfamily.org
CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
I'm
I have a pair of cubes on 4000 series ISRs. I want to do cube-ha on the ccm
facing side and the itsp facing side.
1.) Am I better off just doing HSRP on both sides (which is 70% of cube-ha
anyway) or is it practical to do the connected call failover portion?
2.) If I include the connected call
